Literature DB >> 26183193

In-hospital mortality and stroke after surgical aortic valve replacement: A nationwide perspective.

Shikhar Agarwal1, Aatish Garg2, Akhil Parashar2, Lars G Svensson3, E Murat Tuzcu1, Jose L Navia3, Stephanie Mick3, Samir R Kapadia4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a widely recognized complication after aortic valve replacement (AVR), especially among elderly patients. The literature contains substantial variability in reports of the actual incidence of stroke after AVR among high-risk patients. Our objective was to define risk of stroke in patients undergoing surgical AVR, using a large national database.
METHODS: We used the 2002 to 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for this analysis. All patients undergoing isolated AVR, or AVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR + CABG), were identified using standard International Classification of Diseases codes. In-hospital mortality and any adverse neurologic event were the primary outcomes of the study.
RESULTS: The incidence of in-hospital mortality was 3.0% and 5.1%, respectively, among patients undergoing isolated AVR and AVR + CABG; it was significantly lower in high-volume centers. The incidence of any adverse neurologic event was 2.0% and 2.9%, respectively, among patients undergoing isolated AVR, and AVR + CABG. We demonstrated a progressive increase in the risk of in-hospital mortality and adverse neurologic events with increasing age. Neurologic events increased with age, from 1.3% for patients aged <70 years, to 3.2% for those aged >85 years, for isolated AVR; and from 2.3% to 3.6% for AVR + CABG. The incidence of in-hospital mortality was as high as 5.7% and 7.4%, respectively, among patients aged >85 years undergoing isolated AVR, and AVR + CABG. Similarly, the incidence of any adverse neurologic event was 3.2% and 3.6%, respectively, among patients aged >85 years undergoing isolated AVR, and AVR + CABG. In addition, the risk of adverse neurologic events was significantly higher in the high-risk surgical cohort, compared with the low-risk surgical cohort (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]; isolated AVR: 2.38 [1.99-2.86]; AVR + CABG: 1.88 [1.57-2.24]).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of in-hospital mortality and adverse neurologic events was significantly higher among patients with advanced age and elevated surgical risk.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve replacement; mortality; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26183193     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  Functional independence measure for elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Masaaki Ryomoto; Masataka Mitsuno; Mitsuhiro Yamamura; Hiroe Tanaka; Shinya Fukui; Tetsuya Kajiyama; Ayaka Satou; Yuji Miyamoto; Domen Kazuhisa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-02

2.  Impact of Aortic Atherosclerosis Burden on Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Stephanie Pan; Jock N McCullough; Joseph P Mathew; Judy Hung; Xin Zeng; Pierre Voisine; Patrick T O'Gara; Nancy M Sledz; Annetine C Gelijns; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Steven R Messé; Alan J Moskowitz; Vinod H Thourani; Michael Argenziano; Mark A Groh; Gennaro Giustino; Jessica R Overbey; J Michael DiMaio; Peter K Smith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Meta-Analysis Comparing the Frequency of Stroke After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Kuldeep Shah; Zakeih Chaker; Tatiana Busu; Vinay Badhwar; Fahad Alqahtani; Muhammad Alvi; Amelia Adcock; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  National Trends in Utilization and In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacements in Spain, 2001-2015.

Authors:  Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Napoleón Perez-Farinos; Javier de Miguel-Díez; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Manuel Méndez-Bailón; Isabel Jimenez-Trujillo; José M de Miguel-Yanes; Ana López-de-Andrés
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

5.  Predictors of Mortality Following Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients.

Authors:  Vladimir Shvartz; Maria Sokolskaya; Andrey Petrosyan; Artak Ispiryan; Sergey Donakanyan; Leo Bockeria; Olga Bockeria
Journal:  Pathophysiology       Date:  2022-03-09

6.  The early and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting added to aortic valve replacement compared to isolated aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefano D'Alessandro; Domenico Tuttolomondo; Gurmeet Singh; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Claudia Pattuzzi; Alan Gallingani; Francesco Maestri; Francesco Nicolini; Francesco Formica
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Trend in morbidity and mortality in surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dimagli; Shubhra Sinha; Massimo Caputo; Gianni D Angelini; Umberto Benedetto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Sex-stratified analysis of national trends and outcomes in isolated tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  Pranav Chandrashekar; Erin Amanda Fender; Chad J Zack; Yogesh N V Reddy; Courtney E Bennett; Megha Prasad; Mohammed A Al-Hijji; John M Stulak; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-01-09

9.  The Relation between Volume and Outcome of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jialing He; Zhen Zhang; Han Wang; Lin Cai
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.023

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.