| Literature DB >> 26182916 |
Gary Gabriels1, Mike Lambert2, Pete Smith3, Lubbe Wiesner4, Donavon Hiss5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutritional supplements are used or experimented with by consumers, notably these are; competitive and recreational athletes of all ages, and 'weekend warriors'. As a consequence the supplement industry has grown to meet the increasing demand. A Global Industry Analysts Inc. report indicates that the herbal supplement market has not declined during the worldwide recession, but in fact exhibited steady growth over the period 2008 to 2009. It is anticipated that the market will reach US$93.15 billion by the year 2015. These supplements may contain adulterated substances that may potentially have harmful short - and long-term health consequences to the consumer. "Scrap Melamine" is such an example, which has been implicated in the kidney failure and death of several cats, dogs and pigs. In China in 2008, reports described very severe health effects in infants and young children. At the time over 294,000 infants were screened and diagnosed with urinary tract stones and sand-like calculi associated with melamine in milk products, of which 50,000 infants were hospitalised, and at least six associated deaths, recorded. The extent that melamine contamination occurs in nutritional supplements is not known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether commercially available nutritional and traditional supplement products contain melamine, even though they are not declared by the manufacturer on the product label.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26182916 PMCID: PMC4504043 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-015-0055-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Summary of Nutritional Supplement products investigated for Melamine
| Overall samples acquired in South Africa | Produced and purchased in South Africa | Imported and purchased in South Africa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 138) | (n = 27) | (n = 50) | ||
| Qualitative Assessment Screen | Total No. | 64 | 22 | 29 |
| Positives (%) | 47 | 82 | 58 | |
| Estimate Concentration (*) | ≥ LLOQ (ng/g) Low | 218 | 513 | 218 |
| ≥ LLOQ (ng/g) High | 127030 | 127030 | 76419 | |
| Median (ng/g) | 6031 | 8860 | 6940 | |
* 1ppm = 1mg/kg = 1000ng/g = 1 μg/g
Nutritional Supplement formulation types investigated that tested ‘positive’ for Melamine contamination
| Formulation Types | Number of ‘positives’ for Melamine (Samples acquired in South Africa) | Overall ‘positives’ for Melamine (%) | Produced and purchased in South Africa (n = 27) | Produced and purchased in South Africa (%) | Imported product purchased in South Africa n = 50 | Imported product purchased in South Africa (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 24 | 38 | 5 | 23 | 14 | 48 |
| P/T | 17 | 26 | 9 | 41 | 6 | 21 |
| P/C | 16 | 25 | 6 | 28 | 9 | 31 |
| L/C | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| L | 4 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 100 | 17 | 100 | 29 | 100 |
Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Melamine
| Organization | TDI Maximum Dose | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| WHO | 0.2 mg/kg (2008) | Co-occurrence of melamine with cyanuric acid seems to be more toxic. Cyanuric acid 1,5 mg/kg (TDI). |
| 50 kg person (10 mg) | ||
| Infant Formula - 1ppm | ||
| Foods - 2.5 ppm | ||
| EFSA | 0.2 mg/kg (2010) | In line with WHO (2008) |
| 0.25 mg/kg (before 2010) | ||
| FDA | 2.5 ppm (2008) | “Acceptable” level – despite very few studies on melamine and human consumption |
| CAC | Infant Formula – 1mg/kg | United Nations Food Standards body |
| Food and animal feed – 2.5 mg/kg | ||
| SA | 2.5 ppm | In line with WHO (2008) |
World Health Organization (WHO), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Food and Drug Administration, South Africa, Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolerable_daily_intake. (Accessed on the 10th December 2014)
Global examples of Melamine contaminated levels
| Product | mg/kg | Product | mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Feed | 3.3 – 21,000 | Liquid milk | 8.6 |
| Beverage (coffee/orange juice | 2 | Contaminated Foods | 0.38 – 945 |
| Powdered milk products | 1 – 6.196 | Processed Food and Ingredients | 0.6 – 6.694 |
| Powdered infant formula | 0.1 – 2.563 | Whole eggs | 2.9 – 4.7 |
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/chemical-risks/melamine/en/ (Accessed on the 10th December 2014)
Illustrative examples of melamine contamination levels and consumption relative to accepted TDI
| Description | High | Medium | Low |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration of Melamine (ng/g) | 127030 | 6003 | 218 |
| Formulation Type | P/C | P | P |
| Indication of Protein/amino acids content on Label (Y/N) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Product consumption quantity per day based on consumed and dose information (grams) | 0.593 | 32 | 43 |
| Indication of Melamine content on label (Y/N) | No | No | No |
| Local/ International Product purchase South Africa | Local | International | International |
| Dose information per tablet/capsule (grams) | 0.593 | - | - |
| Total Melamine consumption per day (mg) | 0.075 | 0.192 | 0.009 |
Pre-determine product label information for the Melamine ‘positives’ investigated
| Information category | Total number of Melamine ‘positive’ products (n = 64) | Percentage of total ‘positives’ (%) | Highest number per information category for a given product investigated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dangers and warnings | 20 | 31 | 10 |
| Scientific indication | 20 | 31 | 21 |
| Disclaimers | 19 | 30 | 4 |
| Claims | 21 | 33 | 12 |