Literature DB >> 26182615

Prosthesis-Specific Predictors of Paravalvular Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Impact of Calcification and Sizing on Balloon-Expandable versus Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves.

Barbara E Stähli, Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim, Cathérine Gebhard, Ladina Erhart, Thomas Frauenfelder, Felix C Tanner, Volkmar Falk, Ulf Landmesser, Fabian Nietlispach, Thomas F Lüscher, Willibald Maier, Ronald K Binder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to investigate prosthesis-specific predictors for paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) in self-expandable versus balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs). PAR is frequently observed after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). As self-expandable and balloon-expandable THVs engage differently with the native aortic valve structures, factors that impact PAR may differ between the prosthesis types.
METHODS: A total of 137 TAVR patients who underwent pre-procedural multidetector computed tomography and post-procedural transthoracic echocardiography were studied. Predictors for PAR, including annulus area oversizing and aortic valve calcification mass and volume, were analyzed in a multivariate model.
RESULTS: The Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) prosthesis was utilized in 68 patients (50%), and the Edwards SAPIEN (ES) prosthesis in 69 (50%). More than mild PAR was observed in 43 patients (32%). Among MCV patients, aortic valve calcification volume and mass were higher in those with more than mild PAR than in those with none or mild PAR (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, respectively). Among ES patients, the annulus area and perimeter oversizing were lower in those with more than mild PAR compared to those with no or mild PAR (p = 0.001). By univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, aortic valve calcification mass was the only independent predictor for PAR in MCV patients (p = 0.02), whereas in ES patients it was THV undersizing (p = 0.002), irrespective of the calcific burden.
CONCLUSION: For self-expandable THVs, aortic valve calcification mass was the strongest predictor of PAR, whereas for balloon-expandable THVs it was prosthesis undersizing. Hence, in patients evaluated for TAVR these parameters should guide the selection of prosthesis type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26182615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes using balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter prostheses according to the extent of aortic valve calcification.

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Johannes Blumenstein; Christoph Liebetrau; Andreas Rolf; Luise Gaede; Arnaud Van Linden; Mani Arsalan; Mirko Doss; Jan G P Tijssen; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Role of Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Corinna Storz; Tobias Geisler; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-10

3.  Impact of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Size on Leaflet Stresses: Implications for Durability and Optimal Grey Zone Sizing.

Authors:  Yue Xuan; Danny Dvir; Andrew D Wisneski; Zhongjie Wang; Jian Ye; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2020-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.