Neha Korde1, Mark Roschewski2, Adriana Zingone2, Mary Kwok2, Elisabet E Manasanch3, Manisha Bhutani4, Nishant Tageja5, Dickran Kazandjian2, Sham Mailankody5, Peter Wu2, Candis Morrison2, Rene Costello2, Yong Zhang2, Debra Burton2, Marcia Mulquin2, Diamond Zuchlinski2, Liz Lamping2, Ashley Carpenter2, Yvonne Wall2, George Carter2, Schuyler C Cunningham2, Verena Gounden6, Tristan M Sissung7, Cody Peer7, Irina Maric6, Katherine R Calvo6, Raul Braylan6, Constance Yuan8, Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson8, Diane C Arthur8, Katherine A Kong9, Li Weng9, Malek Faham9, Liza Lindenberg10, Karen Kurdziel10, Peter Choyke10, Seth M Steinberg11, William Figg7, Ola Landgren1. 1. Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, New York, New York2Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, New York, New York. 3. Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, New York, New York3Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 4. Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, New York, New York4Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland5Department of Hemato. 5. Multiple Myeloma Section, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, New York, New York4Medical Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 6. Hematology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Department of Pharmacokinetics, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 8. Lab of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 9. Sequenta Inc, San Francisco, California. 10. Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 11. Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy yields deep responses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is important to gain an understanding of this combination's tolerability and impact on minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity because this end point has been associated with improved survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy in NDMM and high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Clinical and correlative pilot study at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Patients with NDMM or high-risk SMM were enrolled between July 11, 2011, and October 9, 2013. Median follow-up was 17.3 (NDMM) and 15.9 months (SMM). INTERVENTIONS: Eight 28-day cycles were composed of carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21; and dexamethasone 20/10 mg (cycles 1-4/5-8) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23. Patients who achieved at least stable disease subsequently received 24 cycles of lenalidomide extended dosing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points were neuropathy of grade 3 or greater (NDMM) and at least very good partial response rates (SMM). Minimal residual disease was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 45 patients with NDMM, none had neuropathy of grade 3 or greater. Of 12 patients with high-risk SMM, the most common of any-grade adverse events were lymphopenia (12 [100%]) and gastrointestinal disorders (11 [92%]). All patients with SMM achieved at least a very good partial response during the study period. Among the 28 patients with NDMM and the 12 with SMM achieving at least a near-complete response, MRD negativity was found in 28 of 28 (100% [95% CI, 88%-100%]), 11 of 12 (92% [95% CI, 62%-100%]) (multiparametric flow cytometry), 14 of 21 (67% [95% CI, 43%-85%]), and 9 of 12 (75% [95% CI, 43%-94%]) (next-generation sequencing), respectively. In patients with NDMM, 12-month progression-free survival for MRD-negative vs MRD-positive status by flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing was 100% vs 79% (95% CI, 47%-94%; P < .001) and 100% vs 95% (95% CI, 75%-99%; P = .02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy is tolerable and demonstrates high rates of MRD negativity in NDMM, translating into longer progression-free survival in patients achieving MRD negativity. Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy also demonstrates efficacy in high-risk SMM.
IMPORTANCE: Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy yields deep responses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is important to gain an understanding of this combination's tolerability and impact on minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity because this end point has been associated with improved survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy in NDMM and high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Clinical and correlative pilot study at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Patients with NDMM or high-risk SMM were enrolled between July 11, 2011, and October 9, 2013. Median follow-up was 17.3 (NDMM) and 15.9 months (SMM). INTERVENTIONS: Eight 28-day cycles were composed of carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1 through 21; and dexamethasone 20/10 mg (cycles 1-4/5-8) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23. Patients who achieved at least stable disease subsequently received 24 cycles of lenalidomide extended dosing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points were neuropathy of grade 3 or greater (NDMM) and at least very good partial response rates (SMM). Minimal residual disease was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 45 patients with NDMM, none had neuropathy of grade 3 or greater. Of 12 patients with high-risk SMM, the most common of any-grade adverse events were lymphopenia (12 [100%]) and gastrointestinal disorders (11 [92%]). All patients with SMM achieved at least a very good partial response during the study period. Among the 28 patients with NDMM and the 12 with SMM achieving at least a near-complete response, MRD negativity was found in 28 of 28 (100% [95% CI, 88%-100%]), 11 of 12 (92% [95% CI, 62%-100%]) (multiparametric flow cytometry), 14 of 21 (67% [95% CI, 43%-85%]), and 9 of 12 (75% [95% CI, 43%-94%]) (next-generation sequencing), respectively. In patients with NDMM, 12-month progression-free survival for MRD-negative vs MRD-positive status by flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing was 100% vs 79% (95% CI, 47%-94%; P < .001) and 100% vs 95% (95% CI, 75%-99%; P = .02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy is tolerable and demonstrates high rates of MRD negativity in NDMM, translating into longer progression-free survival in patients achieving MRD negativity. Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone therapy also demonstrates efficacy in high-risk SMM.
Authors: Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Daniel Lebovic; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Tara Anderson; Brian Nordgren; Kristen Detweiler-Short; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Asra Ahmed; Terri Jobkar; Diane E Durecki; Kathryn McDonnell; Melissa Mietzel; Daniel Couriel; Mark Kaminski; Ravi Vij Journal: Blood Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jorge Cerveró; Gema Mateo; Jose J Pérez; Maria A Montalbán; Anna Sureda; Laura Montejano; Norma C Gutiérrez; Alfonso García de Coca; Natalia de Las Heras; Maria V Mateos; Maria C López-Berges; Raimundo García-Boyero; Josefina Galende; Jose Hernández; Luis Palomera; Dolores Carrera; Rafael Martínez; Javier de la Rubia; Alejandro Martín; Joan Bladé; Juan J Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel Journal: Blood Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Edie Weller; Sagar Lonial; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Sundar Jagannath; Noopur S Raje; David E Avigan; Wanling Xie; Irene M Ghobrial; Robert L Schlossman; Amitabha Mazumder; Nikhil C Munshi; David H Vesole; Robin Joyce; Jonathan L Kaufman; Deborah Doss; Diane L Warren; Laura E Lunde; Sarah Kaster; Carol Delaney; Teru Hideshima; Constantine S Mitsiades; Robert Knight; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2010-04-12 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S Vincent Rajkumar; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Brian Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Joan Blade; Paul Richardson; Robert Orlowski; David Siegel; Sundar Jagannath; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Antonio Palumbo; Jeffrey Zonder; Heinz Ludwig; David Vesole; Orhan Sezer; Nikhil C Munshi; Jesus San Miguel Journal: Blood Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jan B Egan; Chang-Xin Shi; Waibhav Tembe; Alexis Christoforides; Ahmet Kurdoglu; Shripad Sinari; Sumit Middha; Yan Asmann; Jessica Schmidt; Esteban Braggio; Jonathan J Keats; Rafael Fonseca; P Leif Bergsagel; David W Craig; John D Carpten; A Keith Stewart Journal: Blood Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Ernesto Pérez-Persona; María-Belén Vidriales; Gema Mateo; Ramón García-Sanz; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Alfonso García de Coca; Josefina Galende; Guillermo Martín-Nuñez; José M Alonso; Natalia de Las Heras; José M Hernández; Alejandro Martín; Consuelo López-Berges; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel Journal: Blood Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Angela Dispenzieri; Robert A Kyle; Jerry A Katzmann; Terry M Therneau; Dirk Larson; Joanne Benson; Raynell J Clark; L Joseph Melton; Morie A Gertz; Shaji K Kumar; Rafael Fonseca; Diane F Jelinek; S Vincent Rajkumar Journal: Blood Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; Sundar Jagannath; David Irwin; S Vincent Rajkumar; Gordan Srkalovic; Melissa Alsina; Raymond Alexanian; David Siegel; Robert Z Orlowski; David Kuter; Steven A Limentani; Stephanie Lee; Teru Hideshima; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Michael Kauffman; Julian Adams; David P Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Rafael Fonseca; David Siegel; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Ivan Špička; Tamás Masszi; Roman Hájek; Laura Rosiñol; Vesselina Goranova-Marinova; Georgi Mihaylov; Vladimír Maisnar; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Michael Wang; Ruben Niesvizky; Albert Oriol; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Jiri Minarik; Antonio Palumbo; William Bensinger; Vishal Kukreti; Dina Ben-Yehuda; A Keith Stewart; Mihaela Obreja; Philippe Moreau Journal: Blood Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jagoda K Jasielec; Tadeusz Kubicki; Noopur Raje; Ravi Vij; Donna Reece; Jesus Berdeja; Benjamin A Derman; Cara A Rosenbaum; Paul Richardson; Sandeep Gurbuxani; Sarah Major; Brittany Wolfe; Andrew T Stefka; Leonor Stephens; Kathryn M Tinari; Tyler Hycner; Alexandra E Rojek; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Todd M Zimmerman; Andrzej J Jakubowiak Journal: Blood Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 22.113