| Literature DB >> 27439911 |
Hervé Avet-Loiseau1, Rafael Fonseca2, David Siegel3, Meletios A Dimopoulos4, Ivan Špička5, Tamás Masszi6, Roman Hájek7, Laura Rosiñol8, Vesselina Goranova-Marinova9, Georgi Mihaylov10, Vladimír Maisnar11, Maria-Victoria Mateos12, Michael Wang13, Ruben Niesvizky14, Albert Oriol15, Andrzej Jakubowiak16, Jiri Minarik17, Antonio Palumbo18, William Bensinger19, Vishal Kukreti20, Dina Ben-Yehuda21, A Keith Stewart2, Mihaela Obreja22, Philippe Moreau23.
Abstract
The presence of certain high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, such as translocations (4;14) and (14;16) and deletion (17p), are known to have a negative impact on survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 3 study ASPIRE (N = 792) demonstrated that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed MM. This preplanned subgroup analysis of ASPIRE was conducted to evaluate KRd vs Rd by baseline cytogenetics according to fluorescence in situ hybridization. Of 417 patients with known cytogenetic risk status, 100 patients (24%) were categorized with high-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 48; Rd, n = 52) and 317 (76%) were categorized with standard-risk cytogenetics (KRd, n = 147; Rd, n = 170). For patients with high-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd resulted in a median PFS of 23.1 months, a 9-month improvement relative to treatment with Rd. For patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, treatment with KRd led to a 10-month improvement in median PFS vs Rd. The overall response rates for KRd vs Rd were 79.2% vs 59.6% (high-risk cytogenetics) and 91.2% vs 73.5% (standard-risk cytogenetics); approximately fivefold as many patients with high- or standard-risk cytogenetics achieved a complete response or better with KRd vs Rd (29.2% vs 5.8% and 38.1% vs 6.5%, respectively). KRd improved but did not abrogate the poor prognosis associated with high-risk cytogenetics. This regimen had a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with relapsed MM, irrespective of cytogenetic risk status, and should be considered a standard of care in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01080391.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27439911 PMCID: PMC5009511 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-707596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113