Rachel A Freedman1, Elena M Kouri2, Dee W West3, Nancy L Keating4. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Cancer Registry of Greater California, Public Health Institute, Sacramento. 4. Harvard Medical School, Department of Health Care Policy, Boston, Massachusetts4Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Racial differences in breast cancer treatment may result in part from differences in the surgeons and hospitals from whom patients receive their care. However, little is known about differences in patients' selection of surgeons and hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To examine racial/ethnic differences in how women selected their surgeons and hospitals for breast cancer surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed 500 women (222 non-Hispanic white, 142 non-Hispanic black, 89 English-speaking Hispanic, and 47 Spanish-speaking Hispanic) from northern California cancer registries with stage 0 to III breast cancer diagnosed during 2010 through 2011. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the reasons for surgeon and hospital selection by race/ethnicity, adjusting for other patient characteristics. We also assessed the association between reasons for physician selection and patients' ratings of their surgeon and hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reasons for surgeon and hospital selection and ratings of surgeon and hospital. RESULTS: The 500 participants represented a response rate of 47.8% and a participation rate of 69%. The most frequently reported reason for surgeon selection was referral by another physician (78%); the most frequently reported reason for hospital selection was because it was a part of a patient's health plan (58%). After adjustment, 79% to 87% of black and Spanish-speaking Hispanic women reported selecting their surgeon based on a physician's referral vs 76% of white women (P = .007). Black and Hispanic patients were less likely than white patients to report selecting their surgeon based on reputation (adjusted rates, 18% and 22% of black and Hispanic women, respectively, vs 32% of white women; P = .02). Black and Hispanic women were also less likely than white women to select their hospital based on reputation (adjusted rates, 7% and 15% vs 23%, respectively; P = .003). Women who selected their surgeon based on reputation more often rated the care from their surgeon as excellent (adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.24-3.93); those reporting their surgeon was one of the only surgeons available through the health plan less often reported excellent quality of surgical care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with white patients with breast cancer, minority patients were less actively involved in physician and hospital selection, relying more on physician referral and health plans rather than on reputation. Interventions to promote involvement in surgeon and hospital selection may have potential for addressing disparities related to lower-quality care from surgeons and hospitals.
IMPORTANCE: Racial differences in breast cancer treatment may result in part from differences in the surgeons and hospitals from whom patients receive their care. However, little is known about differences in patients' selection of surgeons and hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To examine racial/ethnic differences in how women selected their surgeons and hospitals for breast cancer surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed 500 women (222 non-Hispanic white, 142 non-Hispanic black, 89 English-speaking Hispanic, and 47 Spanish-speaking Hispanic) from northern California cancer registries with stage 0 to III breast cancer diagnosed during 2010 through 2011. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the reasons for surgeon and hospital selection by race/ethnicity, adjusting for other patient characteristics. We also assessed the association between reasons for physician selection and patients' ratings of their surgeon and hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reasons for surgeon and hospital selection and ratings of surgeon and hospital. RESULTS: The 500 participants represented a response rate of 47.8% and a participation rate of 69%. The most frequently reported reason for surgeon selection was referral by another physician (78%); the most frequently reported reason for hospital selection was because it was a part of a patient's health plan (58%). After adjustment, 79% to 87% of black and Spanish-speaking Hispanic women reported selecting their surgeon based on a physician's referral vs 76% of white women (P = .007). Black and Hispanic patients were less likely than white patients to report selecting their surgeon based on reputation (adjusted rates, 18% and 22% of black and Hispanic women, respectively, vs 32% of white women; P = .02). Black and Hispanic women were also less likely than white women to select their hospital based on reputation (adjusted rates, 7% and 15% vs 23%, respectively; P = .003). Women who selected their surgeon based on reputation more often rated the care from their surgeon as excellent (adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.24-3.93); those reporting their surgeon was one of the only surgeons available through the health plan less often reported excellent quality of surgical care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with white patients with breast cancer, minority patients were less actively involved in physician and hospital selection, relying more on physician referral and health plans rather than on reputation. Interventions to promote involvement in surgeon and hospital selection may have potential for addressing disparities related to lower-quality care from surgeons and hospitals.
Authors: Michael L Barnett; Nancy L Keating; Nicholas A Christakis; A James O'Malley; Bruce E Landon Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Steven J Katz; Timothy P Hofer; Sarah Hawley; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Monica Morrow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marilyn M Schapira; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Cindy M Walker; Alicia J Smallwood; Denisse Gil; Arshia Faghri; Amanda L Kong; Tina W Yen; Susan McDunn; Elizabeth Marcus; Joan M Neuner Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Tammy Jiang; Christian H Stillson; Craig Evan Pollack; Linda Crossette; Michelle Ross; Archana Radhakrishnan; David Grande Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2017 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Sidra N Bonner; Cheryl Clark; Nancy L Keating; Elena M Kouri; Rachel A Freedman Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2018-12-08 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Natalie J Del Vecchio; Natoshia M Askelson; Knute D Carter; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Charles F Lynch; Mary E Charlton Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Rachel A Freedman; Elena M Kouri; Dee W West; Shoshana Rosenberg; Ann H Partridge; Joyce Lii; Nancy L Keating Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Anne R Bass; Huong T Do; Bella Mehta; Stephen Lyman; Serene Z Mirza; Michael Parks; Mark Figgie; Lisa A Mandl; Susan M Goodman Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-07-01