E L Abner1, R J Kryscio2, A M Caban-Holt3, F A Schmitt4. 1. Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky ; Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky. 2. Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky ; Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky ; Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky. 3. Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky ; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky. 4. Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky ; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky ; Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subjective memory complaints reflect patient-identified deficits in memory and have been linked to increased risk of future dementia in nondemented (including cognitively intact) older adults. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of incident dementia during follow-up for participants in the Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease with Vitamin E and Selenium (PREADVISE) study who reported memory complaints at baseline. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo controlled 2×2 randomized controlled trial that transformed into an observational cohort following discontinuation of supplementation in the SELECT parent trial. SETTING: PREADVISE participants were assessed at 130 local clinical study sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico during the controlled trial phase and were later followed by telephone from a centralized location during the observational phase. PARTICIPANTS: PREADVISE enrolled a total of 7,547 nondemented men over the age of 60; 4,271 consented to participation in the observational study. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were interviewed at baseline for memory complaints. The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) was administered to each participant at the annual memory screening. Participants who failed the MIS also received a more detailed neurocognitive assessment: an expanded Consortium to Establish a Registry in Alzheimer's Disease (CERADe) neuropsychological battery was used during the RCT, and the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) was used during the observational study. Participants who failed the second screen were asked to have a memory work-up with a local physician and to share their medical records with PREADVISE. Subgroups of men who did not fail the MIS were also asked to complete the CERADe battery and TICS-m for validation purposes. Additional measures collected include self-reported medical history, medication use, and the AD8 Dementia Screening Test. RESULTS: After controlling for important risk factors for dementia, Cox proportional hazards regression revealed that men who reported memory changes at baseline had an 80% increase in the hazard of incident dementia compared to men who reported no SMC. Men who reported memory problems at baseline had almost a 6-fold increase in the hazard of incident dementia compared to men who reported no memory complaint. CONCLUSIONS:Memory complaints in nondemented older men predicted future dementia. Men who reported that the changes in their memory were a problem were especially at risk, and the presence of common comorbidities like diabetes, sleep apnea, and history of head injury further exacerbated this risk.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Subjective memory complaints reflect patient-identified deficits in memory and have been linked to increased risk of future dementia in nondemented (including cognitively intact) older adults. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of incident dementia during follow-up for participants in the Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease with Vitamin E and Selenium (PREADVISE) study who reported memory complaints at baseline. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo controlled 2×2 randomized controlled trial that transformed into an observational cohort following discontinuation of supplementation in the SELECT parent trial. SETTING: PREADVISE participants were assessed at 130 local clinical study sites in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico during the controlled trial phase and were later followed by telephone from a centralized location during the observational phase. PARTICIPANTS: PREADVISE enrolled a total of 7,547 nondemented men over the age of 60; 4,271 consented to participation in the observational study. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were interviewed at baseline for memory complaints. The Memory Impairment Screen (MIS) was administered to each participant at the annual memory screening. Participants who failed the MIS also received a more detailed neurocognitive assessment: an expanded Consortium to Establish a Registry in Alzheimer's Disease (CERADe) neuropsychological battery was used during the RCT, and the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) was used during the observational study. Participants who failed the second screen were asked to have a memory work-up with a local physician and to share their medical records with PREADVISE. Subgroups of men who did not fail the MIS were also asked to complete the CERADe battery and TICS-m for validation purposes. Additional measures collected include self-reported medical history, medication use, and the AD8Dementia Screening Test. RESULTS: After controlling for important risk factors for dementia, Cox proportional hazards regression revealed that men who reported memory changes at baseline had an 80% increase in the hazard of incident dementia compared to men who reported no SMC. Men who reported memory problems at baseline had almost a 6-fold increase in the hazard of incident dementia compared to men who reported no memory complaint. CONCLUSIONS: Memory complaints in nondemented older men predicted future dementia. Men who reported that the changes in their memory were a problem were especially at risk, and the presence of common comorbidities like diabetes, sleep apnea, and history of head injury further exacerbated this risk.
Authors: Li Wang; Gerald van Belle; Paul K Crane; Walter A Kukull; James D Bowen; Wayne C McCormick; Eric B Larson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Katherine A Gifford; Dandan Liu; Zengqi Lu; Yorghos Tripodis; Nicole G Cantwell; Joseph Palmisano; Neil Kowall; Angela L Jefferson Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: J C Morris; A Heyman; R C Mohs; J P Hughes; G van Belle; G Fillenbaum; E D Mellits; C Clark Journal: Neurology Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sevil Yasar; Jin Xia; Wenliang Yao; Curt D Furberg; Qian-Li Xue; Carla I Mercado; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Linda P Fried; Claudia H Kawas; Kaycee M Sink; Jeff D Williamson; Steven T DeKosky; Michelle C Carlson Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Scott A Sperling; Siny Tsang; Ishan C Williams; Moon Ho Park; Ira M Helenius; Carol A Manning Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Nikki L Hill; Jacqueline Mogle; Sakshi Bhargava; Emily Whitaker; Iris Bhang; Ana W Capuano; Zoe Arvanitakis; David A Bennett; Lisa L Barnes Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 4.077