Literature DB >> 26180572

Cloning SU8 silicon masters using epoxy resins to increase feature replicability and production for cell culture devices.

J W Kamande1, Y Wang2, A M Taylor.   

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the use of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) devices for cell-based studies. Commonly, the negative tone photoresist, SU8, is used to pattern features onto silicon wafers to create masters (SU8-Si) for PDMS replica molding. However, the complexity in the fabrication process, low feature reproducibility (master-to-master variability), silane toxicity, and short life span of these masters have been deterrents for using SU8-Si masters for the production of cell culture based PDMS microfluidic devices. While other techniques have demonstrated the ability to generate multiple devices from a single master, they often do not match the high feature resolution (∼0.1 μm) and low surface roughness that soft lithography masters offer. In this work, we developed a method to fabricate epoxy-based masters that allows for the replication of features with high fidelity directly from SU8-Si masters via their PDMS replicas. By this method, we show that we could obtain many epoxy based masters with equivalent features to a single SU8-Si master with a low feature variance of 1.54%. Favorable feature transfer resolutions were also obtained by using an appropriate Tg epoxy based system to ensure minimal shrinkage of features ranging in size from ∼100 μm to <10 μm in height. We further show that surface coating epoxy masters with Cr/Au lead to effective demolding and yield PDMS chambers that are suitable for long-term culturing of sensitive primary hippocampal neurons. Finally, we incorporated pillars within the Au-epoxy masters to eliminate the process of punching media reservoirs and thereby reducing substantial artefacts and wastage.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26180572      PMCID: PMC4482805          DOI: 10.1063/1.4922962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  15 in total

1.  Microfluidic Multicompartment Device for Neuroscience Research.

Authors:  Anne M Taylor; Seog Woo Rhee; Christina H Tu; David H Cribbs; Carl W Cotman; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 2.  Cell culture models in microfluidic systems.

Authors:  Ivar Meyvantsson; David J Beebe
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 10.745

3.  A microfluidic culture platform for CNS axonal injury, regeneration and transport.

Authors:  Anne M Taylor; Mathew Blurton-Jones; Seog Woo Rhee; David H Cribbs; Carl W Cotman; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Microfluidic culture platform for neuroscience research.

Authors:  Jeong Won Park; Behrad Vahidi; Anne M Taylor; Seog Woo Rhee; Noo Li Jeon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Plastic masters-rigid templates for soft lithography.

Authors:  Salil P Desai; Dennis M Freeman; Joel Voldman
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Rapid replication of master structures by double casting with PDMS.

Authors:  Leonid Gitlin; Philipp Schulze; Detlev Belder
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Characterization of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) properties for biomedical micro/nanosystems.

Authors:  Alvaro Mata; Aaron J Fleischman; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Influence of master fabrication techniques on the characteristics of embossed microfluidic channels.

Authors:  Mandy B Esch; Sahil Kapur; Gizaida Irizarry; Vincent Genova
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 10.  Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices.

Authors:  J Cooper McDonald; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  4 in total

1.  Microfabricated Devices for Confocal Microscopy on Biological Samples.

Authors:  Nicole Y Morgan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

Review 3.  Frontiers in Microfluidics, a Teaching Resource Review.

Authors:  Jack Merrin
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03

Review 4.  Silicon Photonic Biosensors Using Label-Free Detection.

Authors:  Enxiao Luan; Hossam Shoman; Daniel M Ratner; Karen C Cheung; Lukas Chrostowski
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.