Literature DB >> 26179820

Linking Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) to the PROMIS(®) Global Health Scale.

Benjamin D Schalet1, Nan E Rothrock2, Ron D Hays3, Lewis E Kazis4, Karon F Cook2, Joshua P Rutsohn2, David Cella2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global health measures represent an attractive option for researchers and clinicians seeking a brief snapshot of a patient's overall perspective on his or her health. Because scores on different global health measures are not comparable, comparative effectiveness research (CER) is challenging.
OBJECTIVE: To establish a common reporting metric so that the physical and mental health scores on the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12 (©) ) can be converted into scores on the corresponding Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) Global Health scores.
DESIGN: Following a single-sample linking design, participants from an Internet panel completed items from the PROMIS Global Health and VR-12 Health Survey. A common metric was created using analyses based on item response theory (IRT), producing score cross-walk tables for the mental and physical health components of each measure. The linking relationships were evaluated by calculating the standard deviation of differences between the observed and linked PROMIS scores and estimating confidence intervals by sample size. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N = 2025) were 49 % male and 73 % white; mean age was 46 years. MAIN MEASURES: Mental and physical health subscales of the PROMIS Global Health and the VR-12. The mean VR-12 physical component and mental component scores were 45.2 and 46.6, respectively; the mean PROMIS physical and mental health scores were 48.3 and 48.5, respectively. KEY
RESULTS: We found evidence that the combined set of VR-12 and PROMIS items were relatively unidimensional and that we could proceed with linking. Linking worked better between the physical health than mental health scores using VR-12 item responses (vs. linking based on algorithmic scores). For each of the cross-walks, users can minimize the impact of linking error with modest increases in sample sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: VR-12 scores can be expressed on the PROMIS Global Health metric to facilitate the evaluation of treatment, including CER. Extending these results to other common measures of global health is encouraged.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PRO; PROMIS Global Health; Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, VR-12; patient-reported outcome; score linking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26179820      PMCID: PMC4579239          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3453-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  22 in total

1.  Linking scores from multiple health outcome instruments.

Authors:  Neil J Dorans
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Updated U.S. population standard for the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12).

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; William Rogers; John A Fleishman; Shirley X Qian; Benjamin G Fincke; James A Rothendler; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?

Authors:  Thom Baguley
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2008-11-17

4.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski; M S Bayliss; C A McHorney; W H Rogers; A Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans.

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; Dan Berlowitz; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Steven M Wright; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.

Authors:  Darren A DeWalt; Nan Rothrock; Susan Yount; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Dennis A Revicki; Karen L Spritzer; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 Health Survey, V.I.

Authors:  Sepideh S Farivar; William E Cunningham; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  30 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Outcomes as a Measure of Healthcare Quality.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Expanding the Patient's Voice in Nephrology with Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  John D Peipert; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Associations of Preoperative Patient Mental Health and Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics With Baseline Pain, Function, and Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs.

Authors:  Sambit Sahoo; Eric T Ricchetti; Alexander Zajichek; Peter J Evans; Lutul D Farrow; Brett W McCoy; Morgan H Jones; Anthony A Miniaci; Vani J Sabesan; Mark S Schickendantz; William H Seitz; Kurt P Spindler; Kim L Stearns; Greg Strnad; Alparslan Turan; Vahid Entezari; Peter B Imrey; Joseph P Iannotti; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Sport and Physical Activity Level Impacts Health-Related Quality of Life Among Collegiate Students.

Authors:  Traci R Snedden; John Scerpella; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Rocío S Norman; Liga Blyholder; Jen Sanfilippo; Timothy A McGuine; Bryan Heiderscheit
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2018-12-26

5.  Physical function metric over measure: An illustration with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT).

Authors:  Aaron J Kaat; Benjamin D Schalet; Joshua Rutsohn; Roxanne E Jensen; David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population.

Authors:  Sherri L LaVela; Bella Etingen; Scott Miskevics; David Cella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Short term patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: Does the implant matter?

Authors:  Ilda B Molloy; Benjamin J Keeney; Michael B Sparks; Nicholas G Paddock; Karl M Koenig; Wayne E Moschetti; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The sensitivity of the MOS SF-12 and PROMIS® global summary scores to adverse health events in an older cohort.

Authors:  Joanne Allen; Fiona M Alpass; Christine V Stephens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Resident Participation is Not Associated With Worse Outcomes After TKA.

Authors:  Mike H Bao; Benjamin J Keeney; Wayne E Moschetti; Nicholas G Paddock; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Associations of preoperative patient mental health status and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with baseline pain, function, and satisfaction in patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sambit Sahoo; Kathleen A Derwin; Alexander Zajichek; Vahid Entezari; Peter B Imrey; Joseph P Iannotti; Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.