Literature DB >> 2617861

The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range.

J S Pointer1, R F Hess.   

Abstract

The regional variation of contrast sensitivity along the greater extent of each of the four principal hemi-meridia of the normal human eye was determined under photopic conditions using horizontally-orientated sinusoidal grating stimuli. The stimuli were well localized in space and frequency, and special attention was paid to the low spatial frequency range. The results confirm that contrast sensitivity is maximal for central vision for all test spatial stimuli. Extra-foveal fall-off in sensitivity can be represented as a linear function of eccentricity if the latter is expressed in relative units (i.e. periods of the stimulus). The regional variation parameter depends upon whether the horizontal or vertical field is tested and upon the spatial frequency of stimulation. The visible spatial frequency range (0.05-24 c/deg) can be approximately described by just three different rules. The fact that more than one rule is found bears upon current models of the functional organization of the visual system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2617861     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90061-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  Psychophysical characterisation of early functional loss in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  E A Ansari; J E Morgan; R J Snowden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.

Authors:  John M Foley; Srinivasa Varadharajan; Chin C Koh; Mylene C Q Farias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; J Rhys Davies; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Action and perception are temporally coupled by a common mechanism that leads to a timing misperception.

Authors:  Elena Pretegiani; Corina Astefanoaei; Pierre M Daye; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Dorina-Emilia Creanga; Alessandra Rufa; Lance M Optican
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Aaron Nizam; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual search under scotopic lighting conditions.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Alexander C Schütz; Melchi M Michel; Wilson S Geisler; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Contour enhancement benefits older adults with simulated central field loss.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Chaithanya Ramachandra; Premnandhini Satgunam; Bartlett W Mel; Eli Peli; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul; Douglas G Horner; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Robert J Summers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Aliya Hot; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.