Literature DB >> 26178239

Surgery on motor area metastasis.

Marta Rossetto1, Pietro Ciccarino1, Giuseppe Lombardi2, Giuseppe Rolma3, Diego Cecchin4, Alessandro Della Puppa5.   

Abstract

The role of surgery on central area metastasis remains unclear, and outcome data are still controversial. The aim of our study is to analyze the predictive value of clinical and surgical data on motor and functional outcome of patients, taking into account new emerging data on boundary irregularity of brain metastasis. We retrospectively analyzed 47 consecutive patients who underwent surgery assisted by neurophysiologic monitoring for a solitary metastasis in central area between 2010 and 2013. Inclusion criteria were as follows: good functional status (Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70), controlled systemic disease, and absence of extra-cranial dissemination. At 1-month follow up, motor and functional outcomes were compared with preoperative clinical status, response to corticosteroids, extent of tumor resection, boundary irregularity, and size of tumor. Gross total resection was achieved in 93.6% of cases. In preoperative symptomatic patients, motor outcome (according to Medical Research Council grading scale) improved in 55.5% and worsened in 16.7%, while functional outcome (according to KPS score) improved in 50% and worsened in 14.2% of cases. No worsening occurred in preoperative asymptomatic patients. Motor outcome resulted to be not correlated with preoperative deficits, tumor volume, or preoperative response to corticosteroid treatment. Remarkably, motor outcome and extent of surgical resection appeared strongly correlated with tumor boundary irregularity (p < 0.05). Surgery with neurophysiologic monitoring on motor area metastasis can improve functional and motor condition in selected patients. Tumor volume does not represent a limit in surgery. The high correlation between clinical outcome, resection rate, and tumor boundary irregularity strengthens a new belief on the infiltrative growing pattern of brain metastasis. Motor function was evaluated according to Medical Research Council grading scale (Ott et al. 2014) while functional status was assessed according to KPS score.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain metastasis; Central area; Functional outcome; Karnofsky Performance Status; Motor outcome; Neurophysiologic monitoring assisted surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26178239     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0648-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  20 in total

1.  Postoperative treatment and prognosis of patients with resected single brain metastasis: how useful are established prognostic scores?

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Sabrina T Astner; Nikolaus H Andratschke; Kirsten Marienhagen
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 1.876

2.  Somatosensory evoked potential identification of sensorimotor cortex in removal of intracranial neoplasms.

Authors:  D W Rowed; D A Houlden; D G Basavakumar
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Motor tract monitoring during insular glioma surgery.

Authors:  Georg Neuloh; Ulrich Pechstein; Johannes Schramm
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 4.  Intraoperative stimulation techniques for functional pathway preservation and glioma resection.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Awake surgery with continuous motor testing for resection of brain tumors in the primary motor area.

Authors:  Nobusada Shinoura; Mizuho Yoshida; Ryoji Yamada; Yusuke Tabei; Kuniaki Saito; Yuichi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Takayama; Kazuo Yagi
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Reliability of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using motor evoked potentials during resection of metastases in motor-eloquent brain regions: clinical article.

Authors:  Sandro M Krieg; Michael Schäffner; Ehab Shiban; Doris Droese; Thomas Obermüller; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer; Florian Ringel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence guided surgery of high-grade gliomas in eloquent areas assisted by functional mapping. Our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Puppa; Serena De Pellegrin; Elena d'Avella; Giorgio Gioffrè; Marta Rossetto; Alessandra Gerardi; Giuseppe Lombardi; Renzo Manara; Marina Munari; Marina Saladini; Renato Scienza
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  The impact of sedation on brain mapping: a prospective, interdisciplinary, clinical trial.

Authors:  Christian Ott; Christoph Kerscher; Ralf Luerding; Christian Doenitz; Julius Hoehne; Nina Zech; Milena Seemann; Juergen Schlaier; Alexander Brawanski
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  The warning-sign hierarchy between quantitative subcortical motor mapping and continuous motor evoked potential monitoring during resection of supratentorial brain tumors.

Authors:  Kathleen Seidel; Jürgen Beck; Lennart Stieglitz; Philippe Schucht; Andreas Raabe
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Risks of postoperative paresis in motor eloquently and non-eloquently located brain metastases.

Authors:  Thomas Obermueller; Michael Schaeffner; Julia Gerhardt; Bernhard Meyer; Florian Ringel; Sandro M Krieg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  7 in total

1.  Acute changes in diffusion tensor-derived metrics and its correlation with the motor outcome in gliomas adjacent to the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Santiago Cepeda; Sergio García-García; Ignacio Arrese; María Velasco-Casares; Rosario Sarabia
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-02-10

2.  Brain Metastases in Elderly Patients-The Role of Surgery in the Context of Systemic Treatment.

Authors:  Martin Proescholdt; Stephanie T Jünger; Petra Schödel; Karl-Michael Schebesch; Christian Doenitz; Tobias Pukrop; Julius Höhne; Nils-Ole Schmidt; Martin Kocher; Holger Schulz; Maximilian Ruge; Kevin König; Roland Goldbrunner; Stefan Grau
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-18

3.  Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with a micro-multileaf collimator for brain metastasis in the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Ryosuke Matsuda; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Tetsuro Tamamoto; Tomoko Ochi; Toshiteru Miyasaka; Nobuyoshi Inooka; Shigeto Hontsu; Sachiko Miura; Yasuhiro Takeshima; Kentaro Tamura; Shuichi Yamada; Fumihiko Nishimura; Ichiro Nakagawa; Yasushi Motoyama; Young-Soo Park; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Breakouts-A Radiological Sign of Poor Prognosis in Patients With Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Raquel Blazquez; Martin Andreas Proescholdt; Marlene Klauser; Karl-Michael Schebesch; Christian Doenitz; Daniel Heudobler; Lena Stange; Markus J Riemenschneider; Elisabeth Bumes; Katharina Rosengarth; Andreas Schicho; Nils-Ole Schmidt; Alexander Brawanski; Tobias Pukrop; Christina Wendl
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Recurrence benefit from supramarginal resection in brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Weizhao Gong; Taipeng Jiang; Dahui Zuo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 6.  Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in the Perirolandic Region.

Authors:  Fuxing Zuo; Ke Hu; Jianxin Kong; Ye Zhang; Jinghai Wan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects.

Authors:  Martin A Proescholdt; Petra Schödel; Christian Doenitz; Tobias Pukrop; Julius Höhne; Nils Ole Schmidt; Karl-Michael Schebesch
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.