Literature DB >> 17432707

Motor tract monitoring during insular glioma surgery.

Georg Neuloh1, Ulrich Pechstein, Johannes Schramm.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Surgery for insular gliomas incurs a considerable risk of motor morbidity. In this study the authors explore the validity and utility of continuous motor tract monitoring to detect and reverse impending motor impairment during insular glioma resection.
METHODS: Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were successfully monitored during 73 operations to remove insular gliomas. Seventy-two cases were assessable, and one patient died during the early postoperative course. In this prospective observational approach, MEP monitoring results were correlated with intraoperative events and perioperative clinical data. Intraoperative recordings of MEPs remained stable in 40 cases (56%), indicating unimpaired motor outcome and allowing safe completion of the hazardous steps of the procedure. Deterioration of MEPs occurred in 32 cases (44%). This deterioration was reversible after intervention in 21 cases (29%), and there was no new motor deficit except for transient paresis in nine of these cases (13%). Surgical measures could not prevent irreversible MEP deterioration in 11 cases (15%). Transient mild or moderate paresis occurred if complete MEP loss was avoided. Irreversible MEP loss in seven cases (10%) occurred after completion of resection in four of these seven cases, and was consistently an indicator of both a stroke within the deep motor pathways and permanent paresis, which remained severely disabling in three patients (4%). In contrast, permanently severe paresis occurred in two (18%) of 11 cases without useful MEP monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous MEP monitoring is a valid indicator of motor pathway function during insular glioma surgery. This method indicates that remote ischemia, in this study the leading cause of impending motor deterioration, helps to avert definitive stroke of the motor pathways and permanent new paresis in the majority of cases. The rate of permanently severe new deficit appears to be greater in unmonitored cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17432707     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  31 in total

Review 1.  Surgery of insular and paralimbic diffuse low-grade gliomas: technical considerations.

Authors:  Karine Michaud; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Intraoperative assistive technologies and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a systematic review of prospective controlled studies.

Authors:  Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa; Eric Domingos Mariano; Chary Marquez Batista; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Carlos Umberto Pereira; Marcos Soares Tatagiba; Guilherme Alves Lepski
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Surgery on motor area metastasis.

Authors:  Marta Rossetto; Pietro Ciccarino; Giuseppe Lombardi; Giuseppe Rolma; Diego Cecchin; Alessandro Della Puppa
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Morphological characteristics of brain tumors causing seizures.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Patrick Y Wen; Shelley Hurwitz; Peter Black; Santosh Kesari; Jan Drappatz; Alexandra J Golby; William M Wells; Simon K Warfield; Ron Kikinis; Edward B Bromfield
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-03

5.  Insular lobe surgery and cognitive impairment in gliomas operated with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Barbara Zarino; Martina Andrea Sirtori; Tommaso Meschini; Giulio Andrea Bertani; Manuela Caroli; Cristina Bana; Linda Borellini; Marco Locatelli; Giorgio Carrabba
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. The impact of different supportive technologies: a 171-patient series.

Authors:  Andrea Talacchi; Sergio Turazzi; Francesca Locatelli; Francesco Sala; Alberto Beltramello; Franco Alessandrini; Paolo Manganotti; Paola Lanteri; Roberta Gambin; Mario Ganau; Vincenzo Tramontano; Barbara Santini; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials for supratentorial tumor surgery.

Authors:  Jung Jae Lee; Young Il Kim; Jae Taek Hong; Jae Hoon Sung; Sang Won Lee; Seung Ho Yang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-08-31

8.  Effects of surgery on neurocognitive function in patients with glioma: a meta-analysis of immediate post-operative and long-term follow-up neurocognitive outcomes.

Authors:  Justin Choon Hwee Ng; Angela An Qi See; Ting Yao Ang; Lysia Yan Rong Tan; Beng Ti Ang; Nicolas Kon Kam King
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Lack of complete 1p19q deletion in a consecutive series of 12 WHO grade II gliomas involving the insula: a marker of worse prognosis?

Authors:  C Gozé; V Rigau; L Gibert; T Maudelonde; H Duffau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Optimized Tractography Mapping and Quantitative Evaluation of Pyramidal Tracts for Surgical Resection of Insular Gliomas: a Correlative Study with Diffusion Tensor Imaging-Derived Metrics and Patient Motor Strength.

Authors:  Ye Li; Yuanzheng Hou; Qiongge Li; Jie Tang; Jie Lu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.