Literature DB >> 26178205

Risk reducing salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy in high risk women: views of cancer geneticists, genetic counsellors and gynaecological oncologists in the UK.

Dhivya Chandrasekaran1, Usha Menon2, Gareth Evans3, Robin Crawford4, Ertan Saridogan5, Chris Jacobs6, Marc Tischkowitz7, Elly Brockbank8, Jatinder Kalsi9, Davor Jurkovic5, Ranjit Manchanda10,11,12.   

Abstract

Risk-reducing-salpingectomy and Delayed-Oophorectomy (RRSDO) is being proposed as a two-staged approach in place of RRSO to reduce the risks associated with premature menopause in high-risk women. We report on the acceptability/attitude of UK health professionals towards RRSDO. An anonymised web-based survey was sent to UK Cancer Genetics Group (CGG) and British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) members to assess attitudes towards RRSDO. Baseline characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. A Chi square test was used to compare categorical, Kendal-tau-b test for ordinal and Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables between two groups. 173/708 (24.4%) of invitees responded. 71% respondents (CGG = 57%/BGCS = 83%, p = 0.005) agreed with the tubal hypothesis for OC, 55% (CGG = 42%/BGCS = 66%, p = 0.003) had heard of RRSDO and 48% (CGG = 46%/BGCS = 50%) felt evidence was not currently strong enough for introduction into clinical practice. However, 60% respondents' (CGG = 48%/BGCS = 71%, p = 0.009) favoured offering RRSDO to high-risk women declining RRSO, 77% only supported RRSDO within a clinical trial (CGG = 78%/BGCS = 76%) and 81% (CGG = 76%/BGCS = 86%) advocated a UK-wide registry. Vasomotor symptoms (72%), impact on sexual function (63%), osteoporosis (59%), hormonal-therapy (55%) and subfertility (48%) related to premature menopause influenced their choice of RRSDO. Potential barriers to offering the two-stage procedure included lack of data on precise level of benefit (83%), increased surgical morbidity (79%), loss of breast cancer risk reduction associated with oophorectomy (68%), need for long-term follow-up (61%) and a proportion not undergoing DO (66%). There were variations in perception between BGCS/CGG members which are probably attributable to differences in clinical focus/expertise between these two groups. Despite concerns, there is reasonable support amongst UK clinicians to offering RRSDO to premenopausal high-risk women wishing to avoid RRSO, within a prospective clinical trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; Delayed oophorectomy; High-risk; Ovarian cancer; RRSDO; Risk reducing salpingectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26178205     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9823-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  52 in total

1.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Radical fimbriectomy: a reasonable temporary risk-reducing surgery for selected women with a germ line mutation of BRCA 1 or 2 genes? Rationale and preliminary development.

Authors:  Eric Leblanc; Fabrice Narducci; Isabelle Farre; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Sophie Taieb; Claude Adenis; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Kathryn Alsop; Sian Fereday; Cliff Meldrum; Anna deFazio; Catherine Emmanuel; Joshy George; Alexander Dobrovic; Michael J Birrer; Penelope M Webb; Colin Stewart; Michael Friedlander; Stephen Fox; David Bowtell; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study.

Authors:  Andrea Eisen; Jan Lubinski; Jan Klijn; Pal Moller; Henry T Lynch; Kenneth Offit; Barbara Weber; Tim Rebbeck; Susan L Neuhausen; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Eitan Friedman; Gadi Rennert; Teresa Wagner; Claudine Isaacs; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Increased cardiovascular mortality after early bilateral oophorectomy.

Authors:  Cathleen M Rivera; Brandon R Grossardt; Deborah J Rhodes; Robert D Brown; Véronique L Roger; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D Ford; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 based on genetic testing in a Clinical Cancer Genetics service setting: risks of breast/ovarian cancer quoted should reflect the cancer burden in the family.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Andrew Shenton; Emma Woodward; Fiona Lalloo; Anthony Howell; Eamonn R Maher
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  No efficacy of annual gynaecological screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers; an observational follow-up study.

Authors:  B B J Hermsen; R I Olivier; R H M Verheijen; M van Beurden; J A de Hullu; L F Massuger; C W Burger; C T Brekelmans; M J Mourits; G H de Bock; K N Gaarenstroom; H H van Boven; T M Mooij; M A Rookus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Risk-Reducing Strategies for Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Balancing Act.

Authors:  Roi Tschernichovsky; Annekathryn Goodman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-03-17

Review 2.  Options in Prophylactic Surgery to Prevent Ovarian Cancer in High-Risk Women: How New Hypotheses of Fallopian Tube Origin Influence Recommendations.

Authors:  Casey L Swanson; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-05

Review 3.  Risk-reducing salpingectomy: Let us be opportunistic.

Authors:  Kara C Long Roche; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mlica Nourmoussavi; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A patient decision aid for risk-reducing surgery in premenopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Development process and pilot testing.

Authors:  Marline G Harmsen; Miranda P Steenbeek; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Helena C van Doorn; Katja N Gaarenstroom; M Caroline Vos; Leon F A G Massuger; Joanne A de Hullu; Rosella P M G Hermens
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.377

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.