| Literature DB >> 26177653 |
Wei Li1, Ting Zhang1, Yuqing Chen1, Chao Liu1, Wenjia Peng2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been widely used in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathies. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the diagnostic value of EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenopathy (TBLA).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26177653 PMCID: PMC4510950 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.894526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Characteristics of included studies.
| Author (year) | Country | Study design | Age (in years) | Participants (n) | TB diagnosis (n) | HIV+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caglayan (2011) | Turkey | Prospective | 19–81 (range) | 19 | 16 | NA |
| Hu (2011) | China | Retrospective | 24–84 (range) | 10 | 5 | NA |
| Cetinkaya (2011) | Turkey | Prospective | 50.2 (mean) | 48 | 38 | NA |
| Zhao (2012) | China | Retrospective | 60.4 (mean) | 11 | 10 | NA |
| Navani (2012) | UK | Retrospective | 18–86 (range) | 156 | 146 | 17 |
| Navani (2012) | UK | Prospective | 42 (median) | 28 | 26 | NA |
| Gu (2012) | China | Prospective | 16–82 (range) | 124 | 105 | NA |
| Luo (2013) | China | Retrospective | 51.7 (mean) | 13 | 9 | NA |
| Sun (2013) | China | Prospective | 49 (median) | 36 | 35 | NA |
| Kuo (2013) | China | Prospective | 25–91 (range) | 10 | 7 | NA |
| Xie (2013) | China | Retrospective | 47.7 (mean) | 38 | 34 | NA |
| Ren (2013) | China | Retrospective | >18 | 65 | 48 | NO |
| Kaur (2013) | India | Retrospective | NA | 27 | 13 | NO |
| Dhasmana (2014) | UK | Prospective | 65.5 (median) | 99 | 85 | 8 |
QualSyst quality assessment of the included studies.
| Item | Caglayan (2011) | Hu (2011) | Cetinkaya (2011) | Zhao (2012) | Navani (2012) | Navani (2012) | Gu (2012) | Luo (2013) | Sun (2013) | Kuo (2013) | Xie (2013) | Ren (2013) | Kaur (2013) | Dhasmana (2014) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question/objective sufficiently described? | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Study design evident and appropriate? | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Context for the study clear? | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Connection to a wider body of knowledge? | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sampling strategy described, relevant, and justified? | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Data collection methods clearly described? | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Data analysis clearly described? | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Use of verification procedure(s) to establish credibility? | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Conclusions supported by the results? | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Reflexivity of the account? | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Figure 1Flowchart of study selection.
EBUS-TBNA details for included studies.
| Author (year) | Nodal size by CT (mm) | Anesthesia | Stations examined | Nodal short axis on EBUS (mm) | Aspirations | Roes | Microbiology (smear or culture) | PCR | BAL | Needle gauge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caglayan (2011) | >10 | Conscious sedation | 2,4,7,10,11 | 19.6 (mean) | 1.71 (mean) | No | No | No | No | 22G |
| Hu (2011) | NA | General anesthesia | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | No | No | 22G |
| Cetinkaya (2011) | >10 | Conscious sedation | 4,7,10 | NA | 2.6 (mean) | No | 5 (unknown Species) | No | No | 22G |
| Zhao (2012) | >10 | General anesthesia | NA | NA | ≥3 | Yes | No | No | No | 22G |
| Navani (2012) | NA | General anesthesia | 2,4,7,10,11 | 22 (mean) | 1.28 (mean) | Yes (only portion) | 74/156 | No | No | 22G or 21G |
| Navani (2012) | NA | General anesthesia | 2,4,7 | 23 (mean) | 4 | No | unknown, 11/26 | No | No | 22G or 21G |
| Gu (2012) | >10 | General anesthesia | 2,3,4,7,10,11,12 | NA | 1.95 | Yes | No | No | No | 22G |
| Luo (2013) | NA | Conscious sedation | 2,3,4,7,10,11,12 | 22.1 (mean) | 3.5 | No | No | No | No | 22G |
| Sun (2013) | >10 | Conscious sedation | 2,4,7,10,11,12 | 20.1 (mean) | 2.91 | No | 8/35, 17/32 | No | No | 22G |
| Kuo (2013) | >10 | Conscious sedation | 2,4,7,10,11 | Symptomatic (23.8±6.4); asymptomatic (18.9±8.3) | ≥3 | No | 4 (unknown species) | No | Yes | 22G |
| Xie (2013) | ≥10 | General anesthesia | 2,4,7,10,11 | 18.7 (mean) | 3.5 | Yes | 21/34 | Yes (only 9) | No | 22G |
| Ren (2013) | >10 | General anesthesia | 7,4R | 15 (median) | NA | Yes | 11/20,17/20 | No | Yes | 22G |
| Kaur (2013) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | 8/13,5/36 | No | Yes | NA |
| Dhasmana (2014) | NA | General anesthesia | 2,4,7,10,11 | NA | 4–14 (range) | Yes | 14/85,84/85 | Yes | Yes (only 2) | 22G |
Figure 2Meta-analysis on the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal TBLA. Forest plot depicting the effect sizes (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the included studies. Due to the presence of significant heterogeneity, studies were pooled by a random-effects mode.
Subgroup analysis of included studies.
| Item | Studies (n) | Participants (n) | Diagnostic yield | Lower 95% CI limit | Upper 95% CI limit | P-value | I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geography | |||||||
| Asian | 11 | 401 | 75 | 68 | 83 | <0.05 | 68.3 |
| European (UK) | 3 | 283 | 91 | 86 | 96 | 46.8 | |
| Research design | |||||||
| Prospective | 7 | 364 | 82 | 75 | 89 | <0.05 | 60.0 |
| Retrospective | 7 | 320 | 77 | 65 | 89 | 84.9 | |
| Employing ROSE | |||||||
| Yes | 7 | 374 | 79 | 70 | 87 | <0.05 | 74.7 |
| No | 6 | 154 | 77 | 69 | 89 | 67.1 | |
| Anesthesia | |||||||
| Conscious sedation | 5 | 126 | 73 | 64 | 83 | <0.05 | 34.6 |
| Intravenous anesthesia | 8 | 531 | 86 | 81 | 92 | 69.0 | |
| Employing microbiology | |||||||
| Yes | 8 | 459 | 79 | 70 | 88 | >0.05 | 85.4 |
| No | 5 | 177 | 81 | 72 | 91 | 39.4 | |
| Microbiology | |||||||
| Smear | 6 | 377 | 30 | 18 | 42 | <0.05 | 86.1 |
| Culture | 6 | 361 | 54 | 20 | 89 | 98.9 | |
| No. of lymph nodal passes | |||||||
| <3 | 5 | 383 | 82 | 72 | 91 | >0.05 | 83.6 |
| ≥3 | 6 | 199 | 88 | 83 | 92 | 4.5 | |