Literature DB >> 24079724

Optimizing endobronchial ultrasound for molecular analysis. How many passes are needed?

Lonny Yarmus1, Jason Akulian, Christopher Gilbert, David Feller-Kopman, Hans J Lee, Paul Zarogoulidis, Noah Lechtzin, Syed Z Ali, Vidya Sathiyamoorthy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current oncologic management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires pathologic differentiation between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, novel therapies for adenocarcinoma are clinically available for specific mutation profiles. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been shown to adequately obtain specimens for molecular profiling. However, it remains unclear what quantity of specimens is needed to provide suitable mutational genotyping for adenocarcinoma. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal number of aspirations per EBUS-TBNA procedure required in the presence of rapid on-site cytopathology evaluation (ROSE) for maximal diagnostic yield for molecular mutational analysis.
METHODS: From March 2010 to February 2012, cytopathologic data were collected from consecutive cases of adenocarcinoma or NSCLC not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS), diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA and ROSE. Samples of material obtained were air-dried and wet-fixed. Samples were tested for the KRAS, EGFR, and/or ALK mutations.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-five patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA and were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma or NSCLC-NOS were identified. Of the 85 cases identified, 77 (90.6%) were classified as adenocarcinoma with the remaining 8 (9.4%) classified as NSCLC-NOS. Eighty-one of 85 (95.3%) were found to be adequate for molecular profiling. The median number of sites sampled was one. A median of four passes was needed to obtain adequate molecular profiling of 95.3%, using EBUS in conjunction with ROSE.
CONCLUSIONS: With the use of EBUS-TBNA and ROSE, a minimum of four needle passes may provide an adequate amount of specimen for advanced molecular marker analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24079724     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201305-130OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  33 in total

Review 1.  Transbronchial lung biopsy and pneumothorax.

Authors:  Yong Huang; Haidong Huang; Qiang Li; Robert F Browning; Scott Parrish; J Francis Turner; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Ioanna Kougioumtzi; Georgios Dryllis; Ioannis Kioumis; Georgia Pitsiou; Antonis Papaiwannou; Sofia Lampaki; Nikolaos Machairiotis; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Athanasios Madesis; Theodoros Karaiskos; Zhigang Li; Paul Zarogoulidis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Stylet Use Does Not Improve Diagnostic Outcomes in Endobronchial Ultrasonographic Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Eric L Scholten; Roy Semaan; Peter Illei; Christopher Mallow; Sixto Arias; David Feller-Kopman; Karen Oakjones-Burgess; Bernice Frimpong; Ricardo Ortiz; Hans Lee; Lonny Yarmus
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration vs. transthoracic needle aspiration in lung cancer diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Mark L Munoz; Noah Lechtzin; Qing Kay Li; KoPen Wang; Lonny B Yarmus; Hans J Lee; David J Feller-Kopman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy (EBUS-IFB)-technical review.

Authors:  George Cheng; Amit Mahajan; Scott Oh; Sadia Benzaquen; Alexander Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Facilitates Implementation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Lung Cancer Biomarker Testing and Identifies Patients Who May Benefit From Enrollment in Mechanism-Driven Clinical Trials.

Authors:  James H Suh; Adrienne Johnson; Lee Albacker; Kai Wang; Juliann Chmielecki; Garrett Frampton; Laurie Gay; Julia A Elvin; Jo-Anne Vergilio; Siraj Ali; Vincent A Miller; Philip J Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-05-05

6.  Identification of major factors associated with failed clinical molecular oncology testing performed by next generation sequencing (NGS).

Authors:  Hussam Al-Kateb; TuDung T Nguyen; Karen Steger-May; John D Pfeifer
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Understanding local performance data for EBUS-TBNA: insights from an unselected case series at a high volume UK center.

Authors:  Vandana Jeebun; Richard Neil Harrison
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: variability of results and perspectives.

Authors:  Elisa Nardecchia; Maria Cattoni; Lorenzo Dominioni
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Protocol to Improve Genotyping of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosed Using EBUS-TBNA.

Authors:  Christina R Bellinger; Deepankar Sharma; Travis Dotson; Jimmy Ruiz; Graham Parks; Edward F Haponik
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  High concordance of ALK rearrangement between primary tumor and paired metastatic lymph node in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Likun Hou; Shengxiang Ren; Bo Su; Liping Zhang; Wei Wu; Wei Zhang; Zhengwei Dong; Yan Huang; Chunyan Wu; Gang Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.