Literature DB >> 26177482

Interlaboratory comparison of in vitro bioassays for screening of endocrine active chemicals in recycled water.

Alvine C Mehinto1, Ai Jia2, Shane A Snyder2, B Sumith Jayasinghe3, Nancy D Denslow3, Jordan Crago4, Daniel Schlenk4, Christopher Menzie5, Sandy D Westerheide5, Frederic D L Leusch6, Keith A Maruya7.   

Abstract

In vitro bioassays have shown promise as water quality monitoring tools. In this study, four commercially available in vitro bioassays (GeneBLAzer(®) androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and progesterone receptor (PR) assays) were adapted to screen for endocrine active chemicals in samples from two recycled water plants. The standardized protocols were used in an interlaboratory comparison exercise to evaluate the reproducibility of in vitro bioassay results. Key performance criteria were successfully achieved, including low background response, standardized calibration parameters and high intra-laboratory precision. Only two datasets were excluded due to poor calibration performance. Good interlaboratory reproducibility was observed for GR bioassay, with 16-26% variability among the laboratories. ER and PR bioactivity was measured near the bioassay limit of detection and showed more variability (21-54%), although interlaboratory agreement remained comparable to that of conventional analytical methods. AR bioassay showed no activity for any of the samples analyzed. Our results indicate that ER, GR and PR, were capable of screening for different water quality, i.e., the highest bioactivity was observed in the plant influent, which also contained the highest concentrations of endocrine active chemicals measured by LC-MS/MS. After advanced treatment (e.g., reverse osmosis), bioactivity and target chemical concentrations were both below limits of detection. Comparison of bioassay and chemical equivalent concentrations revealed that targeted chemicals accounted for ≤5% of bioassay activity, suggesting that detection limits by LC-MS/MS for some chemicals were insufficient and/or other bioactive compounds were present in these samples. Our study demonstrated that in vitro bioassays responses were reproducible, and can provide information to complement conventional analytical methods for a more comprehensive water quality assessment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalytical screening; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Recycled water; Standardization; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26177482     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  9 in total

1.  Screening for Endocrine Activity in Water Using Commercially-available In Vitro Transactivation Bioassays.

Authors:  Alvine C Mehinto; B Sumith Jayasinghe; Darcy R Vandervort; Nancy D Denslow; Keith A Maruya
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Reproducibility of adipogenic responses to metabolism disrupting chemicals in the 3T3-L1 pre-adipocyte model system: An interlaboratory study.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Kate Hoffman; Johannes Völker; Yong Pu; Almudena Veiga-Lopez; Stephanie M Kim; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Patrizia Bovolin; Erika Cottone; Astrid Saraceni; Rosaria Scandiffio; Ella Atlas; Karen Leingartner; Stacey Krager; Shelley A Tischkau; Sibylle Ermler; Juliette Legler; Vesna A Chappell; Suzanne E Fenton; Fahmi Mesmar; Maria Bondesson; Mariana F Fernández; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.571

4.  Bioanalytical and chemical-specific screening of contaminants of concern in three California (USA) watersheds.

Authors:  Keith A Maruya; Wenjian Lao; Darcy R Vandervort; Richard Fadness; Michael Lyons; Alvine C Mehinto
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-05-25

5.  Trophic transfer and effects of DDT in male hornyhead turbot (Pleuronichthys verticalis) from Palos Verdes Superfund site, CA (USA) and comparisons to field monitoring.

Authors:  Jordan Crago; Elvis Genbo Xu; Allison Kupsco; Fang Jia; Alvine C Mehinto; Wenjian Lao; Keith A Maruya; Jay Gan; Daniel Schlenk
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-04-03       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Combining in vitro reporter gene bioassays with chemical analysis to assess changes in the water quality along the Ammer River, Southwestern Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian E Müller; Beate I Escher; Marc Schwientek; Martina Werneburg; Christiane Zarfl; Christian Zwiener
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.893

7.  Mapping multiple endocrine disrupting activities in Virginia rivers using effect-based assays.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; Michael Collins; Andrew McGowan; Lyuba Varticovski; Razi Raziuddin; David Owen Brody; Jerry Zhao; Johnna Lee; Riley Kuehn; Elisabeth Dehareng; Nicholas Mazza; Gianluca Pegoraro; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 8.  Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for North America.

Authors:  Anne Fairbrother; Derek Muir; Keith R Solomon; Gerald T Ankley; Murray A Rudd; Alistair B A Boxall; Jennifer N Apell; Kevin L Armbrust; Bonnie J Blalock; Sarah R Bowman; Linda M Campbell; George P Cobb; Kristin A Connors; David A Dreier; Marlene S Evans; Carol J Henry; Robert A Hoke; Magali Houde; Stephen J Klaine; Rebecca D Klaper; Sigrun A Kullik; Roman P Lanno; Charles Meyer; Mary Ann Ottinger; Elias Oziolor; Elijah J Petersen; Helen C Poynton; Pamela J Rice; Gabriela Rodriguez-Fuentes; Alan Samel; Joseph R Shaw; Jeffery A Steevens; Tim A Verslycke; Doris E Vidal-Dorsch; Scott M Weir; Peter Wilson; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Glucocorticoids in Freshwaters: Degradation by Solar Light and Environmental Toxicity of the Photoproducts.

Authors:  Alice Cantalupi; Federica Maraschi; Luca Pretali; Angelo Albini; Stefania Nicolis; Elida Nora Ferri; Antonella Profumo; Andrea Speltini; Michela Sturini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.