Literature DB >> 26176815

The state of TRUS biopsy sepsis: readmissions to Victorian hospitals with TRUS biopsy-related infection over 5 years.

Hedley Roth1, Jeremy L Millar1,2,3, Allen C Cheng1,3, Amanda Byrne4,5, Sue Evans2,3, Jeremy Grummet1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence, morbidity and mortality of men who developed infectious complications requiring hospital admission following TRUS prostate biopsy in Victoria, Australia. Further it aimed to report the financial cost of these admissions. SUBJECTS &
METHODS: The Department of Health's Victorian Admitted Episodes Data Set was used to identify those patients who underwent TRUS biopsy in Victoria who were subsequently readmitted within 7 days to any Victorian hospital with infective complications from July 2007 to June 2012. All Victorian public and private hospitals were included. Patients were excluded if their biopsy was performed during a multi-day admission. Financial costing data was obtained where available from the Department Of Health and Human Services for readmissions with post-TRUS infection where available and adjusted to 2012 prices. Institutional ethics committee approval was granted for this study.
RESULTS: Thirty-four thousand eight hundred and sixty-five TRUS biopsies were performed in the 5-year period. 1276 (3.66%) were readmitted to a Victorian hospital within 7 days. 604 (1.73%) of these were readmitted with a biopsy-related infection. No significant trend in sepsis rates was seen in 5 years. The median readmission LOS was 4 days. The total burden of readmissions was 3 686 days over 5 years. One patient readmitted with a biopsy related infection died during that episode of care. 20 051 (57.51%) of biopsies resulted in a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Financial costing data was available for 218 (36%) of infectious readmissions with a mean cost per readmission were $7 362 AUD (£4137 or $6844 USD, 95% CI $6219-8505 AUD) or $1 256 AUD per day.
CONCLUSION: Infection following TRUS biopsy was associated with a readmission rate for infection of 1 in 57 biopsies, an excess of 3 686 bed days required over 5 years with a cost of $1 256 AUD per day. The rate of infection remained stable for the period examined.
© 2015 The Authors BJU International © 2015 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; infection; postoperative complications; prostatic neoplasms; sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26176815     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

1.  2018 CUA Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.

Authors:  S Kaufmann; J Mischinger; B Amend; S Rausch; M Adam; M Scharpf; F Fend; U Kramer; M Notohamiprodjo; K Nikolaou; A Stenzl; J Bedke; S Kruck
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Dutasteride is associated with reduced risk of transrectal prostate biopsy-associated urinary tract infection and related hospitalizations.

Authors:  Daniel M Moreira; Gerald L Andriole; J Curtis Nickel; Claus G Roehrborn; Ramiro Castro-Santamaria; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stockholm 3 Testing Compared to PSA as the Primary Blood Test in the Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway: A Decision Tree Approach.

Authors:  Bettina Wulff Risør; Nasrin Tayyari Dehbarez; Jacob Fredsøe; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen; Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Comparing infective complications from transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy following transition to single dose oral ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.

Authors:  Matthew Farag; Sophie Riddell; John Daffy; Lih-Ming Wong
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 8.  Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy in MRI targeting.

Authors:  Jeremy Grummet; Lana Pepdjonovic; Sean Huang; Elliot Anderson; Boris Hadaschik
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06

Review 9.  Cost consideration in utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ryan Hutchinson; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06

10.  Ciprofloxacin: single versus multiple doses in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Muhammad Rafiq; Fawzy Farag; Kate Manley; Edwin Ho
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.