Literature DB >> 26175311

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear: risk factors for poor functional improvement.

Robert U Hartzler1, Brandon M Steen2, Michael M Hussey2, Michael C Cusick2, Benjamin J Cottrell3, Rachel E Clark3, Mark A Frankle4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some patients unexpectedly have poor functional improvement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. Our aim was to identify risk factors for this outcome. We also assessed the value of RSA for cases with poor functional improvement vs.
METHODS: The study was a retrospective case-control analysis for primary RSA performed for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis with minimum 2-year follow-up. Cases were defined as Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score improvement of ≤1, whereas controls improved SST score ≥2. Risk factors were chosen on the basis of previous association with poor outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer results were analyzed as a subgroup. Value was defined as improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score per $10,000 hospital cost.
RESULTS: In a multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis, neurologic dysfunction (P = .006), age <60 years (P = .02), and high preoperative SST score (P = .03) were independently associated with poor functional improvement. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer patients significantly improved in active external rotation (-0.3° to 38.7°; P < .01). The value of RSA (ΔASES/$10,000 cost) for cases was 0.8 compared with 17.5 for controls (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Young age, high preoperative function, and neurologic dysfunction were associated with poor functional improvement. Surgeons should consider these associations in counseling and selection of patients. Concurrent latissimus dorsi transfer was successful in restoring active external rotation in a subgroup of patients. The critical economic importance of improved patient selection is emphasized by the very low value of the procedure in the case group.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Massive rotator cuff tear; economics; irreparable rotator cuff tear; latissimus dorsi transfer; patient selection; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; value

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26175311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  31 in total

1.  What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Brenda Chang; Joseph T Nguyen; David M Dines; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Shoulder endoprosthesis in the elderly : Hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty? Anatomic or reverse?]

Authors:  J Kircher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Patrick J Denard; Christopher R Adams; Paul C Brady; Robert U Hartzler
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-12-12

4.  Low level of evidence for all treatment modalities for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Bauke Kooistra; Navin Gurnani; Alexander Weening; Michel van den Bekerom; Derek van Deurzen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

6.  Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response.

Authors:  David Kovacevic; Robert J Suriani; Brian M Grawe; Edward H Yian; Mohit N Gilotra; S Ashfaq Hasan; Umasuthan Srikumaran; Samer S Hasan; Frances Cuomo; Robert T Burks; Andrew G Green; Wesley M Nottage; Sai Theja; Hafiz F Kassam; Maarouf A Saad; Miguel A Ramirez; Rodney J Stanley; Matthew D Williams; Vidushan Nadarajah; Alexis C Konja; Jason L Koh; Andrew S Rokito; Charles M Jobin; William N Levine; Christopher C Schmidt
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Massive Rotator Cuff Tear: When to Consider Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas R Sellers; Adham Abdelfattah; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

8.  Pre-operative factors influence the recovery of range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Tetsuya Matsukawa; Patrick J Denard; Solenn Gain; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff tears without arthritis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aparna Viswanath; Steve Bale; Ian Trail
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-15

10.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.