Literature DB >> 26174705

Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements.

Shivani Ahlawat1, Paras Khandheria1, Filippo Del Grande1,2, John Morelli3, Ty K Subhawong4, Shadpour Demehri1, Laura M Fayad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the interobserver reliability of three selective region-of-interest (ROI) measurement protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantifications in soft tissue masses (STMs) compared with whole tumor volume (WTV) ADC measurements.
METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Three observers independently measured minimum and mean ADCs of 73 benign and malignant musculoskeletal STMs using three selective methods (single-slice [SS], predefined three slices [PD], observer-based [OB]) and WTV measurements at 3.0 Tesla. Minimum and mean ADC values derived from each method were compared with WTV measurements, and inter-reader variation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The time required for each method of ADC measurement was recorded.
RESULTS: For the SS, PD, OB, and WTV methods, minimum ADC values ((×10(-3) mm2 /s)) were 0.97, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.67, respectively, and mean ADC values ((×10(-3) mm2 /s)) were 1.49, 1.49, 1.51, and 1.49, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for the minimum and mean ADC values for the three readers using the SS, PD, OB, and WTV (ICC range 0.78-0.90). The SS, PD and OB methods required the least amount of measurement time (14 ± 5, 40 ± 17, and 38 ± 15 s, respectively) while the reference WTV method required the longest measurement time (111 ± 54 s) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: While all selective and WTV measurements offer good to excellent interobserver agreement, the selective OB method of ADC measurement results in the closest values to WTV measurements and requires significantly less measurement time than that required for the WTV method.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC measurement; DWI; interobserver reliability; soft tissue masses

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26174705     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  19 in total

1.  Conventional MR and diffusion-weighted imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue malignancy: correlation with histologic grading.

Authors:  Avneesh Chhabra; Oganes Ashikyan; Chenelle Slepicka; Nathan Dettori; Helena Hwang; Alexandra Callan; Rohit R Sharma; Yin Xi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Chemical shift imaging with in-phase and opposed-phase sequences at 3 T: what is the optimal threshold, measurement method, and diagnostic accuracy for characterizing marrow signal abnormalities?

Authors:  Neil M Kumar; Shivani Ahlawat; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Nonsuppressing normal thymus on chemical-shift MR imaging and anterior mediastinal lymphoma: differentiation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging by using the apparent diffusion coefficient.

Authors:  Adriano Massimiliano Priola; Sandro Massimo Priola; Dario Gned; Maria Teresa Giraudo; Andrea Veltri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Diffusion weighted imaging demystified: the technique and potential clinical applications for soft tissue imaging.

Authors:  Shivani Ahlawat; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Diffusion MRI of cancer: From low to high b-values.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Xiaohong Joe Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Current status and recommendations for imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis.

Authors:  Shivani Ahlawat; Jaishri O Blakeley; Shannon Langmead; Allan J Belzberg; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Imaging of non-neurogenic peripheral nerve malignancy-a case series and systematic review.

Authors:  Rodrigo Luna; Laura M Fayad; Fausto J Rodriguez; Shivani Ahlawat
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  DWI in the Assessment of Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Nita Amornsiripanitch
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-10

9.  Assessment of MR Imaging and CT in Differentiating Hereditary and Nonhereditary Paragangliomas.

Authors:  Y Ota; S Naganawa; R Kurokawa; J R Bapuraj; A Capizzano; J Kim; T Moritani; A Srinivasan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.966

10.  Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method.

Authors:  Xiao-Quan Xu; Hao Hu; Guo-Yi Su; Hu Liu; Hai-Bin Shi; Fei-Yun Wu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.