Literature DB >> 26173775

Correcting Error in Academic Publishing: An Ethical Responsibility.

Phillida Bunkle1.   

Abstract

The 1988 publication of the report of the Cartwright Inquiry and acceptance of its recommendations by the New Zealand Government initiated comprehensive and internationally important reform of bioethics and patients' rights. However, recent writing about the legacy of the inquiry has challenged the legitimacy of the inquiry and contributed to a climate questioning the value of the ethical reforms initiated by it. This article describes unsuccessful attempts to correct factual errors in one publication criticizing the inquiry. These attempts at correction raise ethical issues about the dissemination of the products of medical research-in particular, about the place of research subjects in post-publication ethical deliberations and the responsibility of universities and publishers in decision-making, especially in relation to the correction of error in academic publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic freedom; Cartwright inquiry; Correcting misinformation; Legal protection of research subjects; Linda Bryder; National Women’s Hospital; Patients’ rights; Publication ethics; Research integrity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26173775     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-015-9644-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  13 in total

1.  The Cartwright legacy: shifting the focus of attention from the doctor to the patient.

Authors:  Ron Paterson
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2010-07-30

2.  The 1987 National Women's Hospital (NWH) 'Unfortunate Experiment'. Accusations of unethical experiments and undertreatment, resulting in excess deaths from cervical cancer. Facts and fables.

Authors:  Graeme H Overton
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2010-07-30

3.  Seeking an international dialogue on research integrity.

Authors:  Christie Aschwanden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The natural history of cervical carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  G H Green; J W Donovan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1970-01

5.  Cervical carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  G H Green
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 2.100

6.  The significance of cervical carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  G H Green
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  The pathogenesis of fraud in medical science.

Authors:  R G Petersdorf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Carcinoma in situ of the vulva: a review of 31 treated and five untreated cases.

Authors:  R W Jones; M R McLean
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The invasive potential of carcinoma in situ of the cervix.

Authors:  W A McIndoe; M R McLean; R W Jones; P R Mullins
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Margaret R E McCredie; Katrina J Sharples; Charlotte Paul; Judith Baranyai; Gabriele Medley; Ronald W Jones; David C G Skegg
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.