Literature DB >> 26173731

Temporal Changes in Periprocedural Events in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial.

George Howard1, L Nelson Hopkins1, Wesley S Moore1, Barry T Katzen1, Elie Chakhtoura1, William F Morrish1, Robert D Ferguson1, Robert J Hye1, Fayaz A Shawl1, Mark R Harrigan1, Jenifer H Voeks1, Virginia J Howard1, Brajesh K Lal1, James F Meschia1, Thomas G Brott2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Post-hoc, we hypothesized that over the recruitment period of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST), increasing experience and improved patient selection with carotid stenting, and to a lesser extent, carotid endarterectomy would contribute to lower periprocedural event rates.
METHODS: Three study periods with approximately the same number of patients were defined to span recruitment. Composite and individual rates of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, and death rate were calculated separately by treatment assignment (carotid stenting/carotid endarterectomy). Temporal changes in unadjusted event rates, and rates after adjustment for temporal changes in patient characteristics, were assessed.
RESULTS: For patients randomized to carotid stenting, there was no significant temporal change in the unadjusted composite rates that declined from 6.2% in the first period, to 4.9% in the second, and 4.6% in the third (P=0.28). Adjustment for patient characteristics attenuated the rates to 6.0%, 5.9%, and 5.6% (P=0.85). For carotid endarterectomy-randomized patients, both the composite and the combined stroke and death outcome decreased between periods 1 and 2 and then increased in period 3.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesized temporal reduction of stroke+death events for carotid stenting-treated patients was not observed. Further adjustment for changes in patient characteristics between periods, including the addition of asymptomatic patients and a >50% decrease in proportion of octogenarians enrolled, resulted in practically identical rates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00004732.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenting; myocardial infarction; random allocation; stroke; temporal trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26173731      PMCID: PMC4586027          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  16 in total

1.  Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Robert W Hobson; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Wayne M Clark; William Brooks; Ariane Mackey; Michael D Hill; Pierre P Leimgruber; Alice J Sheffet; Virginia J Howard; Wesley S Moore; Jenifer H Voeks; L Nelson Hopkins; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert D Ferguson; Stanley N Cohen; Joseph L Blackshear; Frank L Silver; J P Mohr; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.

Authors:  Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Mahmoud B Malas; David J Cohen; W Charles Sternbergh; Herbert D Aronow; Mark K Eskandari; Alice J Sheffet; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial: credentialing of interventionalists and final results of lead-in phase.

Authors:  L Nelson Hopkins; Gary S Roubin; Elie Y Chakhtoura; William A Gray; Robert D Ferguson; Barry T Katzen; Kenneth Rosenfield; Jonathan Goldstein; Donald E Cutlip; William Morrish; Brajesh K Lal; Alice J Sheffet; MeeLee Tom; Susan Hughes; Jenifer Voeks; Krishna Kathir; James F Meschia; Robert W Hobson; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Design of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST).

Authors:  A J Sheffet; G Roubin; G Howard; V Howard; W Moore; J F Meschia; R W Hobson; T G Brott
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.266

6.  Does sex matter? Thirty-day stroke and death rates after carotid artery stenting in women versus men: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) lead-in phase.

Authors:  Virginia J Howard; Jenifer H Voeks; Helmi L Lutsep; Ariane Mackey; Genevieve Milot; Albert D Sam; Meelee Tom; Susan E Hughes; Alice J Sheffet; Mary Longbottom; Jason B Avery; Robert W Hobson; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Ederle; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Leo H Bonati; H Bart van der Worp; Gert J de Borst; T Hauw Lo; Peter Gaines; Paul J Dorman; Sumaira Macdonald; Philippe A Lyrer; Johanna M Hendriks; Charles McCollum; Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results.

Authors:  Brajesh K Lal; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Picking the good apples: statistics versus good judgment in choosing stent operators for a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  George Howard; Jenifer H Voeks; James F Meschia; Virginia J Howard; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: importance of case selection.

Authors:  Paul T L Chiam; Gary S Roubin; Sriram S Iyer; Richard M Green; Daniel E Soffer; Christina Brennan; Jiri J Vitek
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Secular Trends in Procedural Stroke or Death Risks of Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Stefanie von Felten; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Richard Bulbulia; David Calvet; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gustav Fraedrich; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; George Howard; John Gregson; Olav Jansen; Martin M Brown; Jean-Louis Mas; Thomas G Brott; Peter A Ringleb; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 6.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.