Literature DB >> 19878793

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial completes randomization: lessons learned and anticipated results.

Brajesh K Lal1, Thomas G Brott.   

Abstract

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs. Stenting Trial (CREST) completed randomization on July 18, 2008. Sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), the trial has enrolled 2,522 participants across North America and is the largest randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing the efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It is also the largest RCT to assess carotid revascularization in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis. Conventional-risk patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (> or =50% by angiography, > or =70% by ultrasound) or asymptomatic carotid stenosis (> or =60% by angiography, > or =70% by ultrasound) were randomized to both treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio. Eligibility criteria for CREST were similar to those of the previous NINDS-sponsored CEA RCTs. The investigational devices used in the CAS arm of the study are the RX Acculink stent and the RX Accunet embolic protection system, (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, Calif). The primary aim is to contrast the efficacy of CAS versus CEA in preventing stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality during a 30-day peri-procedural period, and ipsilateral stroke over the follow-up period (extending up to four years). The secondary aims are to contrast the efficacy of CAS and CEA in men and women, the restenosis rates of the two procedures, health-related quality of life, and cost effectiveness of CAS and CEA. The conclusion of enrollment in CREST marks the end of a long recruitment period from 117 community and academic hospital centers across the United States and Canada. Each surgeon and interventionalist underwent a rigorous credentialing process that included performance-assessment of prior CEA and CAS procedures. Credentialing of interventionalists also included a review of additional CAS procedures enrolled into a CREST lead-in phase prior to entering patients into the randomized trial; 1564 patients were enrolled in the lead-in, the final pathway for the largest credentialing effort to date for any clinical trial. CREST will provide long-term follow-up after carotid revascularization based on systematic ultrasonographic and neurologic surveillance, and on quality of life and cost-effectiveness comparisons between CAS and CEA in the setting of a RCT. We present a brief description of the CREST protocol, impediments that were overcome during the trial, salient results from the lead-in phase of the trial, a summary of enrollment activities and characteristics of the final cohort, and a timeline for anticipated results from the randomized phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19878793      PMCID: PMC2914304          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  19 in total

1.  CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status.

Authors:  R W Hobson
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase.

Authors:  Robert W Hobson; Virginia J Howard; Gary S Roubin; Thomas G Brott; Robert D Ferguson; Jeffrey J Popma; Darlene L Graham; George Howard
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 4.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W S Moore; H J Barnett; H G Beebe; E F Bernstein; B J Brener; T Brott; L R Caplan; A Day; J Goldstone; R W Hobson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?

Authors:  Brajesh K Lal; Robert W Hobson; Jonathan Goldstein; Elie Y Chakhtoura; Walter N Durán
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Leo H Bonati; Jörg Ederle; Dominick J H McCabe; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Peter A Gaines; Jonathan D Beard; Graham S Venables; Hugh S Markus; Andrew Clifton; Peter Sandercock; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 44.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Temporal Changes in Periprocedural Events in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial.

Authors:  George Howard; L Nelson Hopkins; Wesley S Moore; Barry T Katzen; Elie Chakhtoura; William F Morrish; Robert D Ferguson; Robert J Hye; Fayaz A Shawl; Mark R Harrigan; Jenifer H Voeks; Virginia J Howard; Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Agreement between site-reported and ultrasound core laboratory results for duplex ultrasound velocity measurements in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial.

Authors:  R Eugene Zierler; Kirk W Beach; Robert O Bergelin; Brajesh K Lal; Wesley S Moore; Gary S Roubin; Jenifer H Voeks; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Contemporary Management of Patients with Concomitant Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease.

Authors:  Mun J Poi; Angela Echeverria; Peter H Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Safety of the transradial approach to carotid stenting.

Authors:  Young Erben; James F Meschia; Donald V Heck; Fayaz A Shawl; Minerva Mayorga-Carlin; George Howard; Kenneth Rosenfield; John D Sorkin; Thomas G Brott; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.585

5.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Ederle; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Leo H Bonati; H Bart van der Worp; Gert J de Borst; T Hauw Lo; Peter Gaines; Paul J Dorman; Sumaira Macdonald; Philippe A Lyrer; Johanna M Hendriks; Charles McCollum; Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Carotid artery stenting in difficult aortic arch anatomy with or without a new dedicated guiding catheter: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Giulio Barbiero; Diego Cognolato; Andrea Casarin; Rudi Stramanà; Elisa Galzignan; Alessandro Guarise
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of CREST, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brajesh K Lal; Kirk W Beach; Gary S Roubin; Helmi L Lutsep; Wesley S Moore; Mahmoud B Malas; David Chiu; Nicole R Gonzales; J Lee Burke; Michael Rinaldi; James R Elmore; Fred A Weaver; Craig R Narins; Malcolm Foster; Kim J Hodgson; Alexander D Shepard; James F Meschia; Robert O Bergelin; Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Correlation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) and Retinoid X Receptor-alpha (RXR-alpha) expression with clinical risk factors in patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Constantinos Giaginis; Christos Klonaris; Athanassios Katsargyris; Gregorios Kouraklis; Chara Spiliopoulou; Stamatios Theocharis
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-07

9.  Creating accountable care for carotid angioplasty and stenting: A multidisciplinary carotid revascularization board.

Authors:  Maximilian K Kole; Muhib Khan; Horia Marin; William Sanders; Alexander Shepard; Angelos M Katramados; Andrew N Russman; Steven Gellman; Timothy Nypaver; Ghaus Malik; Panayiotis D Mitsias
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.