Mike Grotewiel1,2, Jill C Bettinger3,2. 1. Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. 2. Virginia Commonwealth University Alcohol Research Center, Richmond, Virginia. 3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology , Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the profound clinical significance and strong heritability of alcohol use disorder (AUD), we do not yet have a comprehensive understanding of the naturally occurring genetic variance within the human genome that drives its development. This lack of understanding is likely to be due in part to the large phenotypic and genetic heterogeneities that underlie human AUD. As a complement to genetic studies in humans, many laboratories are using the invertebrate model organisms (iMOs) Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) and Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode worm) to identify genetic mechanisms that influence the effects of alcohol (ethanol) on behavior. While these extremely powerful models have identified many genes that influence the behavioral responses to alcohol, in most cases it has remained unclear whether results from behavioral-genetic studies in iMOs are directly applicable to understanding the genetic basis of human AUD. METHODS: In this review, we critically evaluate the utility of the fly and worm models for identifying genes that influence AUD in humans. RESULTS: Based on results published through early 2015, studies in flies and worms have identified 91 and 50 genes, respectively, that influence 1 or more aspects of behavioral responses to alcohol. Collectively, these fly and worm genes correspond to 293 orthologous genes in humans. Intriguingly, 51 of these 293 human genes have been implicated in AUD by at least 1 study in human populations. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses strongly suggest that the Drosophila and C. elegans models have considerable utility for identifying orthologs of genes that influence human AUD.
BACKGROUND: Despite the profound clinical significance and strong heritability of alcohol use disorder (AUD), we do not yet have a comprehensive understanding of the naturally occurring genetic variance within the human genome that drives its development. This lack of understanding is likely to be due in part to the large phenotypic and genetic heterogeneities that underlie human AUD. As a complement to genetic studies in humans, many laboratories are using the invertebrate model organisms (iMOs) Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) and Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode worm) to identify genetic mechanisms that influence the effects of alcohol (ethanol) on behavior. While these extremely powerful models have identified many genes that influence the behavioral responses to alcohol, in most cases it has remained unclear whether results from behavioral-genetic studies in iMOs are directly applicable to understanding the genetic basis of human AUD. METHODS: In this review, we critically evaluate the utility of the fly and worm models for identifying genes that influence AUD in humans. RESULTS: Based on results published through early 2015, studies in flies and worms have identified 91 and 50 genes, respectively, that influence 1 or more aspects of behavioral responses to alcohol. Collectively, these fly and worm genes correspond to 293 orthologous genes in humans. Intriguingly, 51 of these 293 human genes have been implicated in AUD by at least 1 study in human populations. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses strongly suggest that the Drosophila and C. elegans models have considerable utility for identifying orthologs of genes that influence human AUD.
Authors: Marissa A Ehringer; Hilary V Clegg; Allan C Collins; Robin P Corley; Thomas Crowley; John K Hewitt; Christian J Hopfer; Kenneth Krauter; Jeffrey Lessem; Soo Hyun Rhee; Isabel Schlaepfer; Andrew Smolen; Michael C Stallings; Susan E Young; Joanna S Zeiger Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2007-07-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: David J Speca; Daisuke Chihara; Amir M Ashique; M Scott Bowers; Jonathan T Pierce-Shimomura; Jungsoo Lee; Nusrat Rabbee; Terence P Speed; Rodrigo J Gularte; James Chitwood; Juan F Medrano; Mark Liao; James M Sonner; Edmond I Eger; Andrew S Peterson; Steven L McIntire Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Raniero L Peru Y Colón de Portugal; Shamsideen A Ojelade; Pranav S Penninti; Rachel J Dove; Matthew J Nye; Summer F Acevedo; Antonio Lopez; Aylin R Rodan; Adrian Rothenfluh Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Evgenia V Kriventseva; Fredrik Tegenfeldt; Tom J Petty; Robert M Waterhouse; Felipe A Simão; Igor A Pozdnyakov; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgeny M Zdobnov Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Sean P Farris; Brien P Riley; Robert W Williams; Megan K Mulligan; Michael F Miles; Marcelo F Lopez; Robert Hitzemann; Ovidiu D Iancu; Alexander Colville; Nicole A R Walter; Priscila Darakjian; Denesa L Oberbeck; James B Daunais; Christina L Zheng; Robert P Searles; Shannon K McWeeney; Kathleen A Grant; R Dayne Mayfield Journal: Alcohol Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Jacquelyn L Meyers; Jian Zhang; Niklas Manz; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Chella Kamarajan; Leah Wetherill; David B Chorlian; Sun J Kang; Lance Bauer; Victor Hesselbrock; John Kramer; Samuel Kuperman; John I Nurnberger; Jay Tischfield; Jen Chyong Wang; Howard J Edenberg; Alison Goate; Tatiana Foroud; Bernice Porjesz Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Jorge H Pinzón; Addison R Reed; Nevine A Shalaby; Michael Buszczak; Aylin R Rodan; Adrian Rothenfluh Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Luisa L Scott; James J Sahn; Antonio Ferragud; Rachel C Yen; Praveen N Satarasinghe; Michael D Wood; Timothy R Hodges; Ted Shi; Brooke A Prakash; Kaitlyn M Friese; Angela Shen; Valentina Sabino; Jonathan T Pierce; Stephen F Martin Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jennifer T Wolstenholme; M Scott Bowers; Alexander B Pais; A Christian Pais; Ryan S Poland; Justin L Poklis; Andrew G Davies; Jill C Bettinger Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Amy E Adkins; Laura M Hack; Tim B Bigdeli; Vernell S Williamson; G Omari McMichael; Mohammed Mamdani; Alexis C Edwards; Fazil Aliev; Robin F Chan; Poonam Bhandari; Richard C Raabe; Joseph T Alaimo; GinaMari G Blackwell; Arden Moscati; Ryan S Poland; Benjamin Rood; Diana G Patterson; Dermot Walsh; John B Whitfield; Gu Zhu; Grant W Montgomery; Anjali K Henders; Nicholas G Martin; Andrew C Heath; Pamela A F Madden; Josef Frank; Monika Ridinger; Norbert Wodarz; Michael Soyka; Peter Zill; Marcus Ising; Markus M Nöthen; Falk Kiefer; Marcella Rietschel; Joel Gelernter; Richard Sherva; Ryan Koesterer; Laura Almasy; Hongyu Zhao; Henry R Kranzler; Lindsay A Farrer; Brion S Maher; Carol A Prescott; Danielle M Dick; Silviu A Bacanu; Laura D Mathies; Andrew G Davies; Vladimir I Vladimirov; Mike Grotewiel; M Scott Bowers; Jill C Bettinger; Bradley T Webb; Michael F Miles; Kenneth S Kendler; Brien P Riley Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Laura D Mathies; Fazil Aliev; Andrew G Davies; Danielle M Dick; Jill C Bettinger Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 3.455