Literature DB >> 26172346

Strains of Enterococcus faecalis differ in their ability to coexist in biofilms with other root canal bacteria.

L E Chávez de Paz1, J R Davies1, G Bergenholtz2, G Svensäter1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relationship between protease production and the ability of Enterococcus faecalis strains to coexist in biofilms with other bacteria commonly recovered from infected root canals.
METHODOLOGY: Biofilms with bacteria in mono-, dual- and four-species communities were developed in flow chambers. The organisms used were Lactobacillus salivarius, Streptococcus gordonii and Actinomyces naeslundii and E. faecalis strains, GUL1 and OG1RF. Biovolume and species distribution were examined using 16S rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization in combination with confocal microscopy and image analysis. The full proteome of the E. faecalis strains was studied using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Spots of interest were identified using tandem mass spectroscopy and quantified using Delta 2D software.
RESULTS: All bacteria formed biofilms and an anova analysis revealed that the biofilm biomass increased significantly (P ≤ 0.01) between 6 and 24 h. L. salivarius, S. gordonii and A. naeslundii formed mutualistic biofilm communities, and this pattern was unchanged when E. faecalis GUL1 was included in the consortium. However, with OG1RF, L. salivarius and S. gordonii were outcompeted in a 24-h biofilm. Proteomic analysis revealed that OG1RF secreted higher levels of proteases, GelE (P = 0.02) and SprE (P = 0.002) and a previously unidentified serine protease (P = 0.05), than GUL1.
CONCLUSIONS: Different strains of E. faecalis can interact synergistically or antagonistically with a consortium of root canal bacteria. A possible mechanism underlying this, as well as potential differences in virulence, is production of different levels of proteases, which can cause detachment of neighbouring bacteria and tissue damage.
© 2015 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antagonism; apical periodontitis; bacterial consortium; multispecies; mutualism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26172346     DOI: 10.1111/iej.12501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  9 in total

1.  Metabolic modelling of chronic wound microbiota predicts mutualistic interactions that drive community composition.

Authors:  P Phalak; M A Henson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Effect of Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF on human calvarial osteoblast apoptosis.

Authors:  Yang Li; Shuyu Sun; Cheng Wen; Jialin Zhong; Qianzhou Jiang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 3.  Salvadora persica's Biological Properties and Applications in Different Dental Specialties: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Fahd Aljarbou; Abdulaziz Almobarak; Abdulaziz Binrayes; Hadi M Alamri
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  Biofilms in Endodontics-Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Prasanna Neelakantan; Monica Romero; Jorge Vera; Umer Daood; Asad U Khan; Aixin Yan; Gary Shun Pan Cheung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Infection and Pulp Regeneration.

Authors:  Sahng G Kim
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-10

6.  miR-200a contributes to the migration of BMSCs induced by the secretions of E. faecalis via FOXJ1/NFκB/MMPs axis.

Authors:  Mingwei Li; Lifan Wei; Wei Zhou; Zhiyan He; Shujun Ran; Jingping Liang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 6.832

7.  Endodontic-Like Oral Biofilms as Models for Multispecies Interactions in Endodontic Diseases.

Authors:  Dejana Lukic; Lamprini Karygianni; Manuela Flury; Thomas Attin; Thomas Thurnheer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-06

8.  Antibacterial effect of silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide against E. faecalis, A. naeslundii and P. micra.

Authors:  Benjamín Briseño-Marroquín; Yasmine Ismael; Angelika Callaway; Christian Tennert; Thomas Gerhard Wolf
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 9.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study irrigants and irrigation systems.

Authors:  Christos Boutsioukis; Maria Teresa Arias-Moliz; Luis E Chávez de Paz
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 5.165

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.