Literature DB >> 26171827

Cognitive Style as Environmentally Sensitive Individual Differences in Cognition: A Modern Synthesis and Applications in Education, Business, and Management.

Maria Kozhevnikov1, Carol Evans2, Stephen M Kosslyn3.   

Abstract

The key aims of this article are to relate the construct of cognitive style to current theories in cognitive psychology and neuroscience and to outline a framework that integrates the findings on individual differences in cognition across different disciplines. First, we characterize cognitive style as patterns of adaptation to the external world that develop on the basis of innate predispositions, the interactions among which are shaped by changing environmental demands. Second, we show that research on cognitive style in psychology and cross-cultural neuroscience, on learning styles in education, and on decision-making styles in business and management all address the same phenomena. Third, we review cognitive-psychology and neuroscience research that supports the validity of the concept of cognitive style. Fourth, we show that various styles from disparate disciplines can be organized into a single taxonomy. This taxonomy allows us to integrate all the well-documented cognitive, learning, and decision-making styles; all of these style types correspond to adaptive systems that draw on different levels of information processing. Finally, we discuss how the proposed approach might promote greater coherence in research and application in education, in business and management, and in other disciplines.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive psychology; cognitive styles; environmentally sensitive individual differences; neuroscience; taxonomy of cognitive styles

Year:  2014        PMID: 26171827     DOI: 10.1177/1529100614525555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest        ISSN: 1529-1006


  7 in total

Review 1.  Intellectual style theories: different types of categorizations and their relevance for practitioners.

Authors:  Tine Nielsen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  More Evidence for Three Types of Cognitive Style: Validating the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire Using Eye Tracking when Learning with Texts and Pictures.

Authors:  Tim N Höffler; Marta Koć-Januchta; Detlev Leutner
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Unkept promises of cognitive styles: A new look at old measurements.

Authors:  Félix Cuneo; Jean-Philippe Antonietti; Christine Mohr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cognitive style and working memory among adolescents with specific learning disability.

Authors:  Monica Daniel; Romate John; Eslavath Rajkumar; Allen Joshua George; John Abraham
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2022-06-30

5.  Thinking Styles and Regret in Physicians.

Authors:  Mia Djulbegovic; Jason Beckstead; Shira Elqayam; Tea Reljic; Ambuj Kumar; Charles Paidas; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Power boosts reliance on preferred processing styles.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kossowska; Ana Guinote; Paweł Strojny
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2016-02-29

7.  Cultural variations in global and local attention and eye-movement patterns during the perception of complex visual scenes: Comparison of Czech and Taiwanese university students.

Authors:  Jiří Čeněk; Jie-Li Tsai; Čeněk Šašinka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.