Chinmay S Marathe1, Michael Horowitz1, Laurence G Trahair1, Judith M Wishart1, Michelle Bound1, Kylie Lange1, Christopher K Rayner1, Karen L Jones1. 1. Discipline of Medicine (C.S.M., M.H., L.G.T., J.M.W., M.B., K.L., C.K.R., K.L.J.), The University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; and Centre of Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health (C.S.M., M.H., L.G.T., J.M.W., M.B., K.L., C.K.R., K.L.J.), The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The early glycemic response during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is directly related to the rate of gastric emptying (GE). There is little information about the effect of GE on the blood glucose at either 60 min (a predictor of diabetes) or 120 min (used diagnostically). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between glycemic responses at 30, 60, and 120 min and GE following a 75-g OGTT in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Eighty-two subjects in the general community without diabetes (57 NGT, 25 IGT) and 16 with T2D consumed a 75-g glucose drink labeled with (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid. GE (by scintigraphy) and glycemia were measured from t = 0-120 min and relationships between blood glucose (absolute, change from baseline, and area under the curve) and GE at 30, 60, and 120 min determined. RESULTS: There were no differences in GE. There were relationships between the blood glucose at 30 min and GE (NGT: r = 0.40; P < .01; IGT: r = 0.49; P = .02; T2D: r = 0.62; P = .01). There was also a relationship between the blood glucose at 60 min and GE in IGT (r = 0.52; P = .02) and T2D (r = 0.77; P < .01), but not NGT (r = 0.16; P = .24). In NGT, there was an inverse relationship between blood glucose at 120 min and GE (r = -0.30; P = .02), but not in IGT (r = 0.05; P = .82) or T2D (r = 0.37; P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: GE is a determinant of the glycemic response to an OGTT in NGT, IGT, and T2D but these relationships differ and are time dependent.
CONTEXT: The early glycemic response during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is directly related to the rate of gastric emptying (GE). There is little information about the effect of GE on the blood glucose at either 60 min (a predictor of diabetes) or 120 min (used diagnostically). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between glycemic responses at 30, 60, and 120 min and GE following a 75-g OGTT in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Eighty-two subjects in the general community without diabetes (57 NGT, 25 IGT) and 16 with T2D consumed a 75-g glucose drink labeled with (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid. GE (by scintigraphy) and glycemia were measured from t = 0-120 min and relationships between blood glucose (absolute, change from baseline, and area under the curve) and GE at 30, 60, and 120 min determined. RESULTS: There were no differences in GE. There were relationships between the blood glucose at 30 min and GE (NGT: r = 0.40; P < .01; IGT: r = 0.49; P = .02; T2D: r = 0.62; P = .01). There was also a relationship between the blood glucose at 60 min and GE in IGT (r = 0.52; P = .02) and T2D (r = 0.77; P < .01), but not NGT (r = 0.16; P = .24). In NGT, there was an inverse relationship between blood glucose at 120 min and GE (r = -0.30; P = .02), but not in IGT (r = 0.05; P = .82) or T2D (r = 0.37; P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: GE is a determinant of the glycemic response to an OGTT in NGT, IGT, and T2D but these relationships differ and are time dependent.
Authors: Laurence G Trahair; Thomas E Kimber; Katerina Flabouris; Michael Horowitz; Karen L Jones Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Robert E Steinert; Christine Feinle-Bisset; Lori Asarian; Michael Horowitz; Christoph Beglinger; Nori Geary Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: L G Trahair; C S Marathe; S Standfield; C K Rayner; C Feinle-Bisset; M Horowitz; K L Jones Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Armando Peña; Joon Young Kim; Jessica A Reyes; Kiley B Vander Wyst; Stephanie L Ayers; Micah L Olson; Allison N Williams; Gabriel Q Shaibi Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Thinzar Min; Sarah L Prior; Rachel Churm; Gareth Dunseath; Jonathan D Barry; Jeffrey W Stephens Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: A E Bharucha; S L Daley; P A Low; S J Gibbons; K M Choi; M Camilleri; J J Saw; G Farrugia; A R Zinsmeister Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Ralph A DeFronzo; Melania Manco; Giorgio Sesti; Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Antonio Ceriello; Mary Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Stephanie Chung; Celeste Cravalho; Ram Jagannathan; Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David Owens; Cristina Bianchi; Stefano Del Prato; Mariana P Monteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Jose Luiz Medina; Maria Paula Macedo; Rogério Tavares Ribeiro; João Filipe Raposo; Brenda Dorcely; Nouran Ibrahim; Martin Buysschaert Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 5.602