Literature DB >> 2617131

Regional bone mineral in healthy and osteoporotic women: a cross-sectional study.

A Gotfredsen1, L Nilas, J Pødenphant, A Hadberg, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

Regional bone mineral content and density (BMC and BMD) was measured in six regions (head, arms, chest, spine, pelvis, and legs) using dual photon 153Gd absorptiometry (DPA) in 128 healthy women aged 21-77 years, and in 45 women presenting with Colles' fracture (mean age 65 years), 46 women with vertebral crush or wedge fracture (mean age 68 years), and 27 women with femoral neck-fracture (mean age 74 years). The age-related normal bone loss was generalized, uniformly distributed, and best described by a combination of a premenopausal linear and a postmenopausal exponential regression in all six regions. Looking at BMD, the overall expected bone loss from age 20 to age 80 was approximately 20% in all the regions. When the fracture patients were examined, we found also generalized bone deficit as the prominent feature, amounting to about 20% of the premenopausal level for Colles' and spinal fractures, and about 25% for femoral neck-fracture. However, there was a regional bias in the fracture patients, as the Colles' and spinal fracture patients had a preferential reduction in spinal and pelvic BMD, whereas the patients with femoral neck-fracture had a preferential reduction in pelvic and leg BMD. We conclude that age-related and osteoporotic bone loss is generalized. Furthermore, we propose that regional differences in osteoporotic bone loss are brought about by a simple biological variability of the range of (i) relative amount of trabecular and cortical bone, (ii) rate of loss in the two types of bone tissue, and (iii) time of onset of trabecular relative to cortical bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2617131     DOI: 10.3109/00365518909091552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  12 in total

1.  Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen; P Rødbro
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Effects of age and menopause on bone density of entire skeleton in healthy and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Martini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone changes in postmenopausal Spanish women.

Authors:  H Rico; E R Hernández; M Revilla; L F Villa; M Alvarez de Buergo; E Cuende
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Age-related changes of whole skeleton and body composition in healthy men.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Martini; C Gennari
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Different rates of forearm bone loss in healthy women with early or late menopause.

Authors:  G Luisetto; M Zangari; F Bottega; F Peccolo; P Galuppo; A Nardi; D Ziliotto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The relationship of total body bone mineral (TBBMC) to anthropometric variables in postmenopausal women, and contribution of chronological age and years since menopause to TBBMC loss.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernandez; L Villa; M Alvarez del Buergo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Age-dependence of bone material quality shown by the measurement of frequency of resonance in the ulna.

Authors:  P Kann; S Graeben; J Beyer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Hip fracture patients have generalized osteopenia with a preferential deficit in the femur.

Authors:  J F Aloia; D McGowan; E Erens; G Miele
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Is pelvic bone mineral content assessed through dual energy X-ray absorptiometry an appropriate anatomical area for bone mass estimation in women?

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernández; L F Villa; M Alvarez del Buergo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.