Literature DB >> 26170783

The use of telemedicine in burn care: development of a mobile system for TBSA documentation and remote assessment.

D Parvizi1, M Giretzlehner2, J Dirnberger2, R Owen2, H L Haller3, M V Schintler1, P Wurzer1, D B Lumenta1, L P Kamolz1.   

Abstract

The requirements for accurate documentation within the process of burn assessment have increased dramatically over the years. TBSA (total body surface area) and burn depth are commonly determined by visual inspection, especially in the emergency or acute care setting. However, inexperience often results in incorrect estimation of these factors. In 2001, BurnCase 3D was initiated in order to develop a tool for objective burn assessment and documentation on mobile devices (Apple iPhoneTM). The centerpiece is a 3D model representing the actual patient. At two international burn meetings, a survey containing three pictures of patients was conducted and this data was collected. A patient-specific 3D model adapted to the height and weight of the real patient was created and the digital picture was superimposed in the computer system. The burns were transferred to the model and the TBSA in % was calculated by the software BurnCase 3D. The preferred methods of the 80 respondents for burn extent estimation were: the Rule of Nines (38%), the Rule of Palm (37%) and the Lund-Browder chart (18%). Analysis showed very high deviations of TBSA within the participants, even among the group of experts. In comparison to a computer-aided method we found massive overestimation of up to 230%. The use of BurnCase 3D could have a true impact on the quality of treatment in burns. In the acute care setting for burn injuries, telemedicine has great potential to help guide decisions regarding triage and transfer based on TBSA, burn depth, patient age and injury mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BurnCase 3D; TBSA; application; burn injuries; telemedicine

Year:  2014        PMID: 26170783      PMCID: PMC4396802     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters        ISSN: 1592-9558


  30 in total

1.  Percentage of burned body surface area determination in obese and nonobese patients.

Authors:  E H Livingston; S Lee
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Effect of camera performance on diagnostic accuracy: preliminary results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial.

Authors:  M A Loane; H E Gore; R Corbett; K Steele; C Mathews; S E Bloomer; D J Eedy; R W Telford; R Wootton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.184

3.  Mobile phones for the assessment of burns: we have the technology.

Authors:  Kayvan Shokrollahi; Mobin Sayed; William Dickson; Tom Potokar
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  A review of computer-aided body surface area determination: SAGE II and EPRI's 3D Burn Vision.

Authors:  J M Neuwalder; C Sampson; K H Breuing; D P Orgill
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

5.  Effectiveness of an Internet-based store-and-forward telemedicine system for pediatric subspecialty consultation.

Authors:  Charles W Callahan; Francis Malone; David Estroff; Donald A Person
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2005-04

6.  Body surface area prediction in normal-weight and obese patients.

Authors:  E H Livingston; S Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.310

7.  The effectiveness of video-telemedicine for screening of patients requesting emergency air medical transport (EAMT).

Authors:  Shin-Han Tsai; Jess Kraus; Hsueh-Ru Wu; Wan-Lin Chen; Ming-Fu Chiang; Li-Hua Lu; Chia-En Chang; Wen-Ta Chiu
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-02

8.  A review of three years experience using email and videoconferencing for the delivery of post-acute burns care to children in Queensland.

Authors:  Anthony C Smith; Karen Youngberry; Julie Mill; Roy Kimble; Richard Wootton
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Telemedical versus conventional heart patient monitoring: a survey study with German physicians.

Authors:  Lars Klack; Martina Ziefle; Wiktoria Wilkowska; Johanna Kluge
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Challenges faced in implementation of a telehealth enabled chronic wound care system.

Authors:  M Barrett; A Larson; K Carville; I Ellis
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 1.759

View more
  6 in total

1.  3D PED BURN app: A precise and easy-to-use pediatric 3D burn surface area calculation tool.

Authors:  Jiraroch Meevassana; Piyamit Sumonsriwarankun; Poonpissamai Suwajo; Kasama Nilprapha; Pasu Promniyom; Seree Iamphongsai; Pornthep Pungrasmi; Sirachai Jindarak; Tanasit Kangkorn; Apichai Angspatt
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Practical Computer Vision Application to Compute Total Body Surface Area Burn: Reappraising a Fundamental Burn Injury Formula in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Jeff Choi; Advait Patil; Edward Vendrow; Gavin Touponse; Layla Aboukhater; Joseph D Forrester; David A Spain
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 16.681

3.  Telehealth and Burn Care: From Faxes to Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Caroline Park; Youngwoo Cho; Jalen Harvey; Brett Arnoldo; Benjamin Levi
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  A Smartphone App and Cloud-Based Consultation System for Burn Injury Emergency Care.

Authors:  Lee A Wallis; Julian Fleming; Marie Hasselberg; Lucie Laflamme; Johan Lundin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Early clinical management of severe burn patients using telemedicine: a pilot study protocol.

Authors:  Maxim Moreau; Guy Paré
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-07-04

Review 6.  Technical and Medical Aspects of Burn Size Assessment and Documentation.

Authors:  Michael Giretzlehner; Isabell Ganitzer; Herbert Haller
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.