Literature DB >> 34817552

Practical Computer Vision Application to Compute Total Body Surface Area Burn: Reappraising a Fundamental Burn Injury Formula in the Modern Era.

Jeff Choi1,2, Advait Patil2,3,4, Edward Vendrow2,3, Gavin Touponse2,5, Layla Aboukhater2,5, Joseph D Forrester1,2, David A Spain1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Critical burn management decisions rely on accurate percent total body surface area (%TBSA) burn estimation. Existing %TBSA burn estimation models (eg, Lund-Browder chart and rule of nines) were derived from a linear formula and a limited number of individuals a century ago and do not reflect the range of body habitus of the modern population. Objective: To develop a practical %TBSA burn estimation tool that accounts for exact burn injury pattern, sex, and body habitus. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study evaluated the efficacy of a computer vision algorithm application in processing an adult laser body scan data set. High-resolution surface anthropometry laser body scans of 3047 North American and European adults aged 18 to 65 years from the Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource data set (1998-2001) were included. Of these, 1517 participants (49.8%) were male. Race and ethnicity data were not available for analysis. Analyses were conducted in 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The contributory %TBSA for 18 body regions in each individual. Mobile application for real-time %TBSA burn computation based on sex, habitus, and exact burn injury pattern.
Results: Of the 3047 individuals aged 18 to 65 years for whom body scans were available, 1517 (49.8%) were male. Wide individual variability was found in the extent to which major body regions contributed to %TBSA, especially in the torso and legs. Anterior torso %TBSA increased with increasing body habitus (mean [SD], 15.1 [0.9] to 19.1 [2.0] for male individuals; 15.1 [0.8] to 18.0 [1.7] for female individuals). This increase was attributable to increase in abdomen %TBSA (mean [SD], 5.3 [0.7] to 8.7 [1.8]) among male individuals and increase in abdomen (mean [SD], 4.6 [0.6] to 6.8 [1.7]) and pelvis (mean [SD], 1.5 [0.2] to 2.9 [0.9]) %TBSAs among female individuals. For most body regions, Lund-Browder chart and rule of nines estimates fell outside the population's measured interquartile ranges. The mobile application tested in this study, Burn Area, facilitated accurate %TBSA burn computation based on exact burn injury pattern for 10 sex and body habitus-specific models. Conclusions and Relevance: Computer vision algorithm application to a large laser body scan data set may provide a practical tool that facilitates accurate %TBSA burn computation in the modern era.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34817552      PMCID: PMC8613700          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   16.681


  37 in total

1.  The inter-rater reliability of estimating the size of burns from various burn area chart drawings.

Authors:  T L Wachtel; C C Berry; E E Wachtel; H A Frank
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 2.  The phenomenon of "fluid creep" in acute burn resuscitation.

Authors:  Jeffrey I L Saffle
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  "Understanding burns": research project BurnCase 3D--overcome the limits of existing methods in burns documentation.

Authors:  H L Haller; J Dirnberger; M Giretzlehner; C Rodemund; L Kamolz
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.744

4.  The exposure treatment of burns.

Authors:  A B WALLACE
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1951-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Accuracy of burn size estimation in patients transferred to adult Burn Units in Sydney, Australia: an audit of 698 patients.

Authors:  Varun Harish; Andrew P Raymond; Andrea C Issler; Sepehr S Lajevardi; Ling-Yun Chang; Peter K M Maitz; Peter Kennedy
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  A mobile app for measuring the surface area of a burn in three dimensions: comparison to the Lund and Browder assessment.

Authors:  Harry Goldberg; Justin Klaff; Aaron Spjut; Stephen Milner
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

7.  A comparison study of methods for estimation of a burn surface area: Lund and Browder, e-burn and Mersey Burns.

Authors:  Hsu Phie Chong; Linda Quinn; Amy Jeeves; Rebecca Cooksey; Michelle Lodge; Bernard Carney; Darren Molony
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and outcomes of obese patients with burns.

Authors:  A A Sayampanathan
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Surface Area to Volume Ratio: A Natural Variable for Bacterial Morphogenesis.

Authors:  Leigh K Harris; Julie A Theriot
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 17.079

10.  A Smartphone App and Cloud-Based Consultation System for Burn Injury Emergency Care.

Authors:  Lee A Wallis; Julian Fleming; Marie Hasselberg; Lucie Laflamme; Johan Lundin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.