| Literature DB >> 26170708 |
Adilson Costa1, Elisangela Samartin Pegas Pereira2, Elvira Cancio Assumpção2, Felipe Borba Calixto Dos Santos2, Fernanda Sayuri Ota2, Margareth de Oliveira Pereira2, Maria Carolina Fidelis2, Raquel Fávaro2, Stephanie Selma Barros Langen2, Lúcia Helena Favaro de Arruda2, Eva Nydal Abildgaard3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skin aging is a natural process that may be aggravated by environmental factors. Topical products are the conventional means to combat aging; however, the use of oral supplements is on the rise to assist in the management of aged skin.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; dermal density; skin hydration; supplements
Year: 2015 PMID: 26170708 PMCID: PMC4492544 DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S79447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol ISSN: 1178-7015
Clinical effects according to medical assessment
| Parameter | Day 60
| Day 90
| Day 120
| Day 150
| Day 180
| Day 210
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | Day 90 | Day 120 | Day 150 | Day 180 | Day 210 | |
| Wrinkles | 20 | 49.00 | 33 | 80.00 | 27 | 66.00 | 22 | 54.00 | 13 | 32.00 | 23 | 56.00 | 0.003 | 0.108 | 0.670 | 0.108 | 0.549 |
| Fine lines | 20 | 49.00 | 33 | 80.00 | 30 | 73.00 | 21 | 51.00 | 13 | 32.00 | 23 | 56.00 | 0.003 | 0.025 | 0.835 | 0.108 | 0.549 |
| Solar melanosis | 16 | 39.00 | 31 | 76.00 | 14 | 34.00 | 9 | 22.00 | 5 | 12.00 | 13 | 32.00 | 0.001 | 0.655 | 0.108 | 0.005 | 0.467 |
| Other hyperchromias | 18 | 44.00 | 29 | 71.00 | 16 | 39.00 | 11 | 27.00 | 6 | 15.00 | 13 | 32.00 | 0.016 | 0.655 | 0.071 | 0.003 | 0.251 |
| Erythema | 15 | 37.00 | 24 | 59.00 | 9 | 22.00 | 7 | 17.00 | 9 | 22.00 | 22 | 54.00 | 0.071 | 0.532 | 0.317 | 0.513 | 0.018 |
| Hydration | 31 | 76.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 40 | 98.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 40 | 98.00 | – | 0.003 | 0.011 | – | 0.007 |
| Radiance | 31 | 76.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 40 | 98.00 | – | 0.020 | 0.020 | – | 0.007 |
| Sebum | 17 | 41.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 31 | 76.00 | 23 | 56.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 23 | 56.00 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.134 | 0.003 | 0.109 |
| Smoothness | 31 | 76.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 40 | 98.00 | 41 | 100.00 | – | 0.011 | 0.021 | 0.007 | – |
| Overall appearance | 34 | 83.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 40 | 98.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 41 | 100.00 | 40 | 98.00 | – | 0.035 | 0.132 | – | 0.035 |
Clinical effects according to subjects’ self-assessment
| Parameter | Day 60
| Day 90
| Day 120
| Day 150
| Day 180
| Day 210
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | Day 90 | Day 120 | Day 150 | Day 180 | Day 210 | |
| Wrinkles | 19 | 46.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 28 | 68.00 | 29 | 71.00 | 34 | 83.00 | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 0.018 | <0.001 |
| Fine lines | 18 | 44.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 31 | 76.00 | 27 | 66.00 | 29 | 71.00 | 35 | 85.00 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.013 | 0.008 | <0.001 |
| Solar melanosis | 16 | 39.00 | 25 | 61.00 | 23 | 56.00 | 21 | 51.00 | 22 | 54.00 | 31 | 76.00 | 0.039 | 0.071 | 0.414 | 0.134 | 0.001 |
| Other hyperchromias | 14 | 34.00 | 24 | 59.00 | 22 | 54.00 | 21 | 51.00 | 22 | 54.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 0.033 | 0.046 | 0.221 | 0.059 | <0.001 |
| Erythema | 9 | 22.00 | 20 | 49.00 | 16 | 39.00 | 14 | 34.00 | 11 | 27.00 | 29 | 71.00 | 0.008 | 0.035 | 0.251 | 0.564 | <0.001 |
| Hydration | 26 | 63.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 33 | 80.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.090 | <0.001 |
| Radiance | 25 | 61.00 | 37 | 90.00 | 35 | 85.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 39 | 95.00 | 0.001 | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.071 | <0.001 |
| Sebum | 22 | 54.00 | 28 | 68.00 | 29 | 71.00 | 30 | 73.00 | 21 | 51.00 | 32 | 78.00 | 0.637 | 0.201 | 0.046 | 0.841 | 0.012 |
| Smoothness | 26 | 63.00 | 36 | 88.00 | 34 | 83.00 | 37 | 90.00 | 37 | 90.00 | 37 | 90.00 | 0.012 | 0.046 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Overall appearance | 27 | 66.00 | 40 | 98.00 | 37 | 90.00 | 36 | 88.00 | 37 | 90.00 | 38 | 93.00 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Grading (arbitrary units) and percentile improvement in the objective clinical parameters according to the VISIAa system at day 210 in relation to day 30
| Day 30 | Day 210 | Improvement | % improvement | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spots | |||||
| Grading | 2,665 | 2,453 | 212 | 8 | 0.008 |
| Percentile | 47% | 57% | 10% | 21 | <0.001 |
| Texture | |||||
| Grading | 2,403 | 2,090 | 313 | 34 | 0.017 |
| Percentile | 58% | 69% | 11% | 19 | 0.001 |
| Pores | |||||
| Grading | 2,334 | 1,896 | 438 | 23 | 0.001 |
| Percentile | 44% | 65% | 21% | 48 | <0.001 |
| UV spots | |||||
| Grading | 1,057 | 599 | 458 | 76 | <0.001 |
| Brown spots | |||||
| Grading | 5,418 | 3,539 | 1,879 | 53 | <0.001 |
Note:
Canfield Imaging Systems, Fairfield, NJ, USA.
Abbreviation: UV, ultraviolet.
Changes in facial skin hydration, facial skin pH, facial density, facial sebumetry, and sebumetry of inner side of arm (arm sebumetry) during the study
| Average | Median | Standard deviation | Minimum | Maximum | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face corneometry (hydration units) | ||||||
| Day 30 | 59.3 | 54.4 | 18.9 | 39.2 | 162.4 | 0.014 |
| Day 210 | 67.6 | 63.0 | 21.0 | 34.4 | 113.4 | |
| Face pHmetry | ||||||
| Day 30 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 6.0 | <0.001 |
| Day 210 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 5.2 | |
| Ultrasound scan, face (arbitrary units) | ||||||
| Day 30 | 31.41 | 29 | 7.5 | 18 | 50 | <0.001 |
| Day 210 | 69.77 | 66 | 10.32 | 55 | 96 | |
| Face sebumetry (mg/cm2) | ||||||
| Day 30 | 98.0 | 86.3 | 50.5 | 22.0 | 218.8 | 0.861 |
| Day 210 | 100.9 | 85.7 | 54.1 | 18.0 | 254.0 | |
| Arm sebumetry (mg/cm2) | ||||||
| Day 30 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 16.2 | 0.0 | 78.0 | 0.398 |
| Day 210 | 7.1 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 71.0 | |
Figure 1Histological images showing collagen and elastic fibers of face and left arm before and after treatment.
Notes: (A) Collagen evidenced by Masson’s trichrome method. (B) Elastic fibers evidenced by Verhoeff method.
Abbreviation: D, day.
Figure 2Histological exam showing collagen and elastic fibers of face and left arm before and after treatment.
Notes: (A) Collagen evidenced by Masson’s trichrome method. (B) Elastic fibers evidenced by Verhoeff method.
Abbreviation: D, day.
Figure 3Collagen evidenced by ultrasound images before and after intervention.
Abbreviation: D, day.
Evolution of collagen and elastic fibers of inner side of left arm long the study according to histological findings
| Left arm biopsy | Average (%) | Median (%) | Standard deviation (%) | Minimum (%) | Maximum (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen | ||||||
| Day 30 | 42.5 | 42.9 | 11.4 | 10.2 | 62.4 | <0.001 |
| Day 210 | 57.4 | 58.2 | 9.6 | 39.5 | 76.6 | |
| Elastic fibers | ||||||
| Day 30 | 14.6 | 12.8 | 7.9 | 4.4 | 33.7 | 0.004 |
| Day 210 | 19.8 | 18.1 | 9.3 | 7.4 | 51.8 | |
Evolution of facial collagen and elastic fibers during the study according to histological findings
| Face biopsy | Average (%) | Median (%) | Standard deviation (%) | Minimum (%) | Maximum (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen | |||||||
| Day 30 | 43.0 | 42.5 | 9.9 | 25.2 | 66.0 | <0.001 | |
| Day 210 | 57.4 | 57.8 | 9.7 | 31.2 | 89.6 | ||
| Elastic fibers | |||||||
| Day 30 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 13.3 | 4.6 | 58.8 | <0.001 | |
| Day 210 | 31.2 | 26.9 | 16.0 | 9.3 | 64.8 | ||