Literature DB >> 26170232

Improved prediction of RNA secondary structure by integrating the free energy model with restraints derived from experimental probing data.

Yang Wu1, Binbin Shi1, Xinqiang Ding1, Tong Liu1, Xihao Hu2, Kevin Y Yip2, Zheng Rong Yang3, David H Mathews4, Zhi John Lu5.   

Abstract

Recently, several experimental techniques have emerged for probing RNA structures based on high-throughput sequencing. However, most secondary structure prediction tools that incorporate probing data are designed and optimized for particular types of experiments. For example, RNAstructure-Fold is optimized for SHAPE data, while SeqFold is optimized for PARS data. Here, we report a new RNA secondary structure prediction method, restrained MaxExpect (RME), which can incorporate multiple types of experimental probing data and is based on a free energy model and an MEA (maximizing expected accuracy) algorithm. We first demonstrated that RME substantially improved secondary structure prediction with perfect restraints (base pair information of known structures). Next, we collected structure-probing data from diverse experiments (e.g. SHAPE, PARS and DMS-seq) and transformed them into a unified set of pairing probabilities with a posterior probabilistic model. By using the probability scores as restraints in RME, we compared its secondary structure prediction performance with two other well-known tools, RNAstructure-Fold (based on a free energy minimization algorithm) and SeqFold (based on a sampling algorithm). For SHAPE data, RME and RNAstructure-Fold performed better than SeqFold, because they markedly altered the energy model with the experimental restraints. For high-throughput data (e.g. PARS and DMS-seq) with lower probing efficiency, the secondary structure prediction performances of the tested tools were comparable, with performance improvements for only a portion of the tested RNAs. However, when the effects of tertiary structure and protein interactions were removed, RME showed the highest prediction accuracy in the DMS-accessible regions by incorporating in vivo DMS-seq data.
© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26170232      PMCID: PMC4551937          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  50 in total

1.  Use of dimethyl sulfate to probe RNA structure in vivo.

Authors:  S E Wells; J M Hughes; A H Igel; M Ares
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Discovering common stem-loop motifs in unaligned RNA sequences.

Authors:  J Gorodkin; S L Stricklin; G D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  RNA secondary structure prediction by centroids in a Boltzmann weighted ensemble.

Authors:  Ye Ding; Chi Yu Chan; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Computational identification of protein binding sites on RNAs using high-throughput RNA structure-probing data.

Authors:  Xihao Hu; Thomas K F Wong; Zhi John Lu; Ting Fung Chan; Terrence Chi Kong Lau; Siu Ming Yiu; Kevin Y Yip
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  An RNA Mapping DataBase for curating RNA structure mapping experiments.

Authors:  Pablo Cordero; Julius B Lucks; Rhiju Das
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Understanding the transcriptome through RNA structure.

Authors:  Yue Wan; Michael Kertesz; Robert C Spitale; Eran Segal; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  SeqFold: genome-scale reconstruction of RNA secondary structure integrating high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Zhengqing Ouyang; Michael P Snyder; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo.

Authors:  Silvi Rouskin; Meghan Zubradt; Stefan Washietl; Manolis Kellis; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome.

Authors:  Yue Wan; Kun Qu; Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Ryan A Flynn; Ohad Manor; Zhengqing Ouyang; Jiajing Zhang; Robert C Spitale; Michael P Snyder; Eran Segal; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The four ingredients of single-sequence RNA secondary structure prediction. A unifying perspective.

Authors:  Elena Rivas
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.652

View more
  30 in total

1.  Comparative and integrative analysis of RNA structural profiling data: current practices and emerging questions.

Authors:  Krishna Choudhary; Fei Deng; Sharon Aviran
Journal:  Quant Biol       Date:  2017-03-30

2.  Robust statistical modeling improves sensitivity of high-throughput RNA structure probing experiments.

Authors:  Alina Selega; Christel Sirocchi; Ira Iosub; Sander Granneman; Guido Sanguinetti
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A high-throughput approach to profile RNA structure.

Authors:  Riccardo Delli Ponti; Stefanie Marti; Alexandros Armaos; Gian Gaetano Tartaglia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Modeling RNA secondary structure folding ensembles using SHAPE mapping data.

Authors:  Aleksandar Spasic; Sarah M Assmann; Philip C Bevilacqua; David H Mathews
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Physics-based all-atom modeling of RNA energetics and structure.

Authors:  Louis G Smith; Jianbo Zhao; David H Mathews; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.957

6.  Surprising Sequence Effects on GU Closure of Symmetric 2 × 2 Nucleotide RNA Internal Loops.

Authors:  Kyle D Berger; Scott D Kennedy; Susan J Schroeder; Brent M Znosko; Hongying Sun; David H Mathews; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  Computational approaches for the discovery of splicing regulatory RNA structures.

Authors:  Ryan J Andrews; Walter N Moss
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.490

8.  IPANEMAP: integrative probing analysis of nucleic acids empowered by multiple accessibility profiles.

Authors:  Afaf Saaidi; Delphine Allouche; Mireille Regnier; Bruno Sargueil; Yann Ponty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo RNA folding.

Authors:  Kathleen A Leamy; Sarah M Assmann; David H Mathews; Philip C Bevilacqua
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  Characterizing RNA structures in vitro and in vivo with selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq).

Authors:  Kyle E Watters; Angela M Yu; Eric J Strobel; Alex H Settle; Julius B Lucks
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.