Literature DB >> 26170056

Online versus offline: The Web as a medium for response time data collection.

Andrey Chetverikov1,2, Philipp Upravitelev3.   

Abstract

The Internet provides a convenient environment for data collection in psychology. Modern Web programming languages, such as JavaScript or Flash (ActionScript), facilitate complex experiments without the necessity of experimenter presence. Yet there is always a question of how much noise is added due to the differences between the setups used by participants and whether it is compensated for by increased ecological validity and larger sample sizes. This is especially a problem for experiments that measure response times (RTs), because they are more sensitive (and hence more susceptible to noise) than, for example, choices per se. We used a simple visual search task with different set sizes to compare laboratory performance with Web performance. The results suggest that although the locations (means) of RT distributions are different, other distribution parameters are not. Furthermore, the effect of experiment setting does not depend on set size, suggesting that task difficulty is not important in the choice of a data collection method. We also collected an additional online sample to investigate the effects of hardware and software diversity on the accuracy of RT data. We found that the high diversity of browsers, operating systems, and CPU performance may have a detrimental effect, though it can partly be compensated for by increased sample sizes and trial numbers. In sum, the findings show that Web-based experiments are an acceptable source of RT data, comparable to a common keyboard-based setup in the laboratory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JavaScript; Online; Reaction times; Response times; Task difficulty; Visual search; Web

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26170056     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0632-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  14 in total

1.  A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation.

Authors:  Rahul Bhui
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  A new jsPsych plugin for psychophysics, providing accurate display duration and stimulus onset asynchrony.

Authors:  Daiichiro Kuroki
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02

3.  The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Jérôme Tagu; Sunčica Zdravković; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-06

4.  The semantic basis of taste-shape associations.

Authors:  Carlos Velasco; Andy T Woods; Lawrence E Marks; Adrian David Cheok; Charles Spence
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Human behavioral complexity peaks at age 25.

Authors:  Nicolas Gauvrit; Hector Zenil; Fernando Soler-Toscano; Jean-Paul Delahaye; Peter Brugger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Promises and pitfalls of Web-based experimentation in the advance of replicable psychological science: A reply to Plant (2015).

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Bruno R Bocanegra
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-12

7.  Assessing Lifetime Stress Exposure Using the Stress and Adversity Inventory for Adults (Adult STRAIN): An Overview and Initial Validation.

Authors:  George M Slavich; Grant S Shields
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Effect of Caffeine on Attention and Alertness Measured in a Home-Setting, Using Web-Based Cognition Tests.

Authors:  Wilrike J Pasman; Ruud Boessen; Yoni Donner; Nard Clabbers; André Boorsma
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-09-07

9.  A Mobile App Delivering a Gamified Battery of Cognitive Tests Designed for Repeated Play (OU Brainwave): App Design and Cohort Study.

Authors:  Martin Thirkettle; Jennifer Lewis; Darren Langdridge; Graham Pike
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.143

10.  A direct and conceptual replication of post-loss speeding when gambling.

Authors:  Charlotte Eben; Zhang Chen; Luc Vermeylen; Joël Billieux; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.