Literature DB >> 26169031

Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair.

Laurel J Blair1, Samuel W Ross1, Ciara R Huntington1, John D Watkins1, Tanushree Prasad1, Amy E Lincourt1, Vedra A Augenstein1, B Todd Heniford2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative imaging with computed tomography (CT) scans can be useful in preoperative planning. We hypothesized that CT measurements of ventral hernia defect size and abdominal wall thickness (AWT) would correlate with postoperative complications and need for complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent open ventral hernia repair and had preoperative abdominal CT imagining were identified from an institutional hernia-specific surgery outcomes database at our tertiary referral hernia center. Grade III and IV hernias and biologic mesh cases were excluded. CT measures of defect size and AWT were analyzed and correlated to complications and the need for AWR techniques using univariate, multivariate, and principal component (PC) analyses. PC1 and PC2 used five AWT measures, hernia defect width, and body mass index to create a new component variable.
RESULTS: There were 151 open ventral hernia repairs included in the study. Preoperative findings included 37.7% male; age 55.3 ± 12.5 years; body mass index (BMI) 33.3 ± 7.8 kg/m(2); 60.3% were recurrent hernias with average defect width 8.5 ± 5.0 cm and area 178.3 ± 214 cm(2); AWT at umbilicus 3.5 ± 1.8 cm; and AWT at pubis 7.0 ± 3.2. Component separation was performed in 24.0% of patients and panniculectomy in 34.4%. Wound complications occurred in 13.3% patients, and 2.7% had hernia recurrence. Increasing defect width, length, and area as well as select AWT measurements were associated with increased need for component separation, concomitant panniculectomy, and higher rates of wound and total complications (all P < 0.05). Using multivariate regression, PC1 was associated with wound complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16); PC2 (hernia defect width) was associated with the need for component separation (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.30). Hernia recurrence was not predicted by AWT or defect size (OR, 1.00; 95%CI, 0.87-1.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CT measurements of hernia defects and AWT predict wound complications and the need for complex AWR techniques. Obtaining preoperative CT imaging should be a consideration in preoperative planning and may help with patient counseling.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall reconstruction; CT scan; Complications; Component separation; Computed tomography; Defect size; Measurement; Panniculectomy; Recurrence; Ventral hernia repair

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26169031     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  17 in total

1.  Three-dimensional hernia analysis: the impact of size on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Kathryn A Schlosser; Sean R Maloney; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Preoperative conditioning and surgical strategies for treatment of complex abdominal wall hernias].

Authors:  G Köhler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature.

Authors:  C Stabilini; G Cavallaro; P Dolce; S Capoccia Giovannini; F Corcione; M Frascio; M Sodo; G Merola; U Bracale
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Prehabilitation of complex ventral hernia patients with Botulinum: a systematic review of the quantifiable effects of Botulinum.

Authors:  J A Wegdam; T S de Vries Reilingh; N D Bouvy; S W Nienhuijs
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  BMI: does it predict the need for component separation?

Authors:  J R Smith; R Kyriakakis; M P Pressler; G D Fritz; A T Davis; A L Banks-Venegoni; L T Durling
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  Controversies and Techniques in the Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernias.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Blatnik; L Michael Brunt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Validation of a simple technique of volumetric analysis of complex incisional hernias without 3D CT scan reconstruction.

Authors:  Mazen R Al-Mansour; Jacqueline Wu; Greg Gagnon; Alexander Knee; John Romanelli; Neal E Seymour
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Adjunct botox to preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for incisional hernia with loss of domain: no additional effect but may improve outcomes.

Authors:  A Tashkandi; J Bueno-Lledó; J Durtette-Guzylack; A Cayeux; R Bukhari; R Rhaeim; J M Malinovski; R Kianmanesh; Y Renard
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Linear versus volumetric CT analysis in predicting tension-free fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  M R Al-Mansour; J Wu; G Gagnon; A Knee; J R Romanelli; N E Seymour
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  A simplified method to evaluate the loss of domain.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Al Sadairi; Jules Durtette-Guzylack; Arnaud Renard; Carole Durot; Aurore Thierry; Reza Kianmanesh; Guillaume Passot; Yohann Renard
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.920

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.