J R Smith1,2, R Kyriakakis3, M P Pressler3, G D Fritz3, A T Davis4,5, A L Banks-Venegoni6, L T Durling6. 1. Spectrum Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowship, 100 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. Joshua.Smith2@spectrumhealth.org. 2. Department of Surgery, Spectrum Health Medical Group, 1900 Wealthy St SE Suite 180, Grand Rapids, MI, 49506, USA. Joshua.Smith2@spectrumhealth.org. 3. Spectrum Health/Michigan State University General Surgery Residency, 100 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Michigan State University, 15 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. 5. Spectrum Health Office of Research and Education, 100 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Spectrum Health Medical Group, 1900 Wealthy St SE Suite 180, Grand Rapids, MI, 49506, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient optimization and selecting the proper technique to repair large incisional hernias is a multifaceted challenge. Body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable variable that may infer higher intra-abdominal pressures and, thus, predict the need for component separation (CS) at the time of surgery, but no data exist to support this. This paper assesses if the ratio of anterior-posterior (AP): transverse (TRSV) abdominal diameter, from pre-operative CT imaging, indicates a larger proportion of intra-abdominal fat and correlates with a hernia defect requiring a component separation for successful tension-free closure. METHODS: Ninety patients were identified who underwent either an open hernia repair with mesh by primary closure (N = 53) or who required a component separation at the time of surgery (N = 37). Pre-operative CT images were used to measure hernia defect width, AP abdominal diameter, and TRSV abdominal diameter. Quantitative data, nominal data, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors associated with surgical group categorization. RESULTS: The average hernia defect widths for primary closure and CS were 7.7 ± 3.6 cm (mean ± SD) and 9.8 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.015). The average BMI for primary closure was 33.9 ± 7.2 and 33.8 ± 4.9 for those requiring CS (p = 0.924). The AP:TRSV diameter ratios for primary closure and CS were 0.41 ± 0.08 and 0.49 ± 0.10, respectively (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis including both defect width and AP:TRSV diameter ratio, only AP:TRSV diameter ratio predicted the need for a CS (p = 0.001) while BMI did not (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Intraabdominal fat distribution measured by AP:TRSV abdominal diameter ratio correlates with successful tension-free fascial closure during incisional hernia repair, while BMI does not.
PURPOSE: Patient optimization and selecting the proper technique to repair large incisional hernias is a multifaceted challenge. Body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable variable that may infer higher intra-abdominal pressures and, thus, predict the need for component separation (CS) at the time of surgery, but no data exist to support this. This paper assesses if the ratio of anterior-posterior (AP): transverse (TRSV) abdominal diameter, from pre-operative CT imaging, indicates a larger proportion of intra-abdominal fat and correlates with a hernia defect requiring a component separation for successful tension-free closure. METHODS: Ninety patients were identified who underwent either an open hernia repair with mesh by primary closure (N = 53) or who required a component separation at the time of surgery (N = 37). Pre-operative CT images were used to measure hernia defect width, AP abdominal diameter, and TRSV abdominal diameter. Quantitative data, nominal data, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors associated with surgical group categorization. RESULTS: The average hernia defect widths for primary closure and CS were 7.7 ± 3.6 cm (mean ± SD) and 9.8 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.015). The average BMI for primary closure was 33.9 ± 7.2 and 33.8 ± 4.9 for those requiring CS (p = 0.924). The AP:TRSV diameter ratios for primary closure and CS were 0.41 ± 0.08 and 0.49 ± 0.10, respectively (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis including both defect width and AP:TRSV diameter ratio, only AP:TRSV diameter ratio predicted the need for a CS (p = 0.001) while BMI did not (p = 0.92). CONCLUSION: Intraabdominal fat distribution measured by AP:TRSV abdominal diameter ratio correlates with successful tension-free fascial closure during incisional hernia repair, while BMI does not.
Authors: Christopher J Goodenough; Mike K Liang; Mylan T Nguyen; Duyen H Nguyen; Julie L Holihan; Zeinab M Alawadi; John S Roth; Curtis J Wray; Tien C Ko; Lillian S Kao Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jennifer M DiCocco; Louis J Magnotti; Katrina P Emmett; Ben L Zarzaur; Martin A Croce; John P Sharpe; C Patrick Shahan; Haiqiao Jiao; Steven P Goldberg; Timothy C Fabian Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Hemasat Alkhatib; Luciano Tastaldi; David M Krpata; Clayton C Petro; Li-Ching Huang; Sharon Phillips; Aldo Fafaj; Steven Rosenblatt; Michael J Rosen; Ajita S Prabhu Journal: Surgery Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Karl Breuing; Charles E Butler; Stephen Ferzoco; Michael Franz; Charles S Hultman; Joshua F Kilbridge; Michael Rosen; Ronald P Silverman; Daniel Vargo Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Marten N Basta; Geoffrey M Kozak; Robyn B Broach; Charles A Messa; Irfan Rhemtulla; Ron P DeMatteo; Joseph M Serletti; John P Fischer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Brenton R Franklin; Ketan M Patel; Maurice Y Nahabedian; Laura E Baldassari; Emil I Cohen; Parag Bhanot Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 1.539