Literature DB >> 26168424

Short, Sweet, and Problematic? The Rise of the Short Report in Psychological Science.

Alison Ledgerwood1, Jeffrey W Sherman2.   

Abstract

Our field has witnessed a rapid increase in the appeal and prevalence of the short report format over the last two decades. In this article, we discuss both the benefits and drawbacks of the trend toward shorter and faster publications. Although the short report format can help us cope with ever-increasing time constraints; ease the burden on hiring, promotion, and tenure committees; speed the publication of our findings; and promote the dissemination of research beyond the borders of our discipline, it can also exacerbate problems with publication bias and selective reporting, decrease theoretical integration within our science, and risk overemphasizing colorful effects relative to basic processes. In the face of these challenges, we believe it is essential to find ways to preserve the advantages of the short-and-fast approach while minimizing its disadvantages and while acknowledging the complementary and critical importance of longer articles in advancing the field. © Association for Psychological Science 2012.

Keywords:  history; methodology; practices; publication; short reports

Year:  2012        PMID: 26168424     DOI: 10.1177/1745691611427304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  5 in total

1.  Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Kalif E Vaughn; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

2.  Effects of video-game play on information processing: a meta-analytic investigation.

Authors:  Kasey L Powers; Patricia J Brooks; Naomi J Aldrich; Melissa A Palladino; Louis Alfieri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  Perception isn't so simple: commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012).

Authors:  Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-18

4.  Portrait of the journal as a young adult.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean; David Ozonoff
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Honest signaling in academic publishing.

Authors:  Leonid Tiokhin; Karthik Panchanathan; Daniel Lakens; Simine Vazire; Thomas Morgan; Kevin Zollman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.