Literature DB >> 26168169

Development, Characterization, and Pluripotency Analysis of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from In Vitro-Fertilized, Hand-Guided Cloned, and Parthenogenetic Embryos.

Syed Mohmad Shah1, Neha Saini1, Syma Ashraf1, Mohammad Zandi1, Radhey Sham Manik1, Suresh Kumar Singla1, Prabhat Palta1, Manmohan Singh Chauhan1.   

Abstract

We present the derivation, characterization, and pluripotency analysis of three buffalo embryonic stem cell (buESC) lines, from in vitro-fertilized, somatic cell nuclear-transferred, and parthenogenetic blastocysts. These cell lines were developed for later differentiation into germ lineage cells and elucidation of the signaling pathways involved. The cell lines were established from inner cell masses (ICMs) that were isolated manually from the in vitro-produced blastocysts. Most of the ICMs (45-55%) resulted in formation of primary colonies that were subcultured after 8-10 days, leading subsequently to the formation of three buESC lines, one from each blastocyst type. All the cell lines expressed stem cell markers, such as Alkaline Phosphatase, OCT4, NANOG, SSEA1, SSEA4, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81, SOX2, REX1, CD-90, STAT3, and TELOMERASE. They differentiated into all three germ layers as determined by ectodermal, mesodermal, and endodermal RNA and protein markers. All of the cell lines showed equal expression of pluripotency markers as well as equivalent differentiation potential into all the three germ layers. The static suspension culture-derived embryoid bodies (EBs) showed greater expression of all the three germ layer markers as compared to hanging drop culture-derived EBs. When analyzed for germ layer marker expression, EBs derived from 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS)-based spontaneous differentiation medium showed greater differentiation across all the three germ layers as compared to those derived from Knock-Out Serum Replacement (KoSR)-based differentiation medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26168169      PMCID: PMC4529090          DOI: 10.1089/cell.2014.0098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  66 in total

Review 1.  Transgenic technology and applications in swine.

Authors:  M B Wheeler; E M Walters
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Somatic cell cloning without micromanipulators.

Authors:  G Vajta; I M Lewis; P Hyttel; G A Thouas; A O Trounson
Journal:  Cloning       Date:  2001

3.  Pluripotency of bovine embryonic cell line derived from precompacting embryos.

Authors:  M Mitalipova; Z Beyhan; N L First
Journal:  Cloning       Date:  2001

4.  Efficiency of embryoid body formation and hematopoietic development from embryonic stem cells in different culture systems.

Authors:  Stephen M Dang; Michael Kyba; Rita Perlingeiro; George Q Daley; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Isolation of embryonic stem-like cells from equine blastocysts and their differentiation in vitro.

Authors:  Shigeo Saito; Hideyo Ugai; Ken Sawai; Yusuke Yamamoto; Akira Minamihashi; Kahori Kurosaka; Yoshiro Kobayashi; Takehide Murata; Yuichi Obata; Kazunari Yokoyama
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Preimplantation human embryos and embryonic stem cells show comparable expression of stage-specific embryonic antigens.

Authors:  J K Henderson; J S Draper; H S Baillie; S Fishel; J A Thomson; H Moore; P W Andrews
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Production of live calves derived from embryonic stem-like cells aggregated with tetraploid embryos.

Authors:  S Iwasaki; K H Campbell; C Galli; K Akiyama
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Molecular cloning, genetic mapping, and developmental expression of bovine POU5F1.

Authors:  M J van Eijk; M A van Rooijen; S Modina; L Scesi; G Folkers; H T van Tol; M M Bevers; S R Fisher; H A Lewin; D Rakacolli; C Galli; C de Vaureix; A O Trounson; C L Mummery; F Gandolfi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Reprogramming of telomerase activity and rebuilding of telomere length in cloned cattle.

Authors:  D Betts; V Bordignon; J Hill; Q Winger; M Westhusin; L Smith; W King
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function.

Authors:  Ariel A Avilion; Silvia K Nicolis; Larysa H Pevny; Lidia Perez; Nigel Vivian; Robin Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.