Literature DB >> 26168140

When less is more: Impact of face processing ability on recognition of visually degraded faces.

Jessica Royer1, Caroline Blais1, Frédéric Gosselin2, Justin Duncan1, Daniel Fiset1.   

Abstract

It is generally thought that faces are perceived as indissociable wholes. As a result, many assume that hiding large portions of the face by the addition of noise or by masking limits or qualitatively alters natural "expert" face processing by forcing observers to use atypical processing mechanisms. We addressed this question by measuring face processing abilities with whole faces and with Bubbles (Gosselin & Schyns, 2001), an extreme masking method thought by some to bias the observers toward the use of atypical processing mechanisms by limiting the use of whole-face strategies. We obtained a strong and negative correlation between individual face processing ability and the number of bubbles (r = -.79), and this correlation remained strong even after controlling for general visual/cognitive processing ability (rpartial = -.72). In other words, the better someone is at processing faces, the fewer facial parts they need to accurately carry out this task. Thus, contrary to what many researchers assume, face processing mechanisms appear to be quite insensitive to the visual impoverishment of the face stimulus. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26168140     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

2.  Face perception: A brief journey through recent discoveries and current directions.

Authors:  Ipek Oruc; Benjamin Balas; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Validation of the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Test.

Authors:  Chao-Chih Wang; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-23

4.  Mapping the impairment in decoding static facial expressions of emotion in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Daniel Fiset; Caroline Blais; Jessica Royer; Anne-Raphaëlle Richoz; Gabrielle Dugas; Roberto Caldara
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Identifying the Micro-relations Underpinning Familiarity Detection in Dynamic Displays Containing Multiple Objects.

Authors:  Jamie S North; Ed Hope; A Mark Williams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  The role of spatial frequencies for facial pain categorization.

Authors:  Isabelle Charbonneau; Joël Guérette; Stéphanie Cormier; Caroline Blais; Guillaume Lalonde-Beaudoin; Fraser W Smith; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.