Literature DB >> 26168120

Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science.

Sander L Koole1, Daniël Lakens2.   

Abstract

Although replications are vital to scientific progress, psychologists rarely engage in systematic replication efforts. In this article, we consider psychologists' narrative approach to scientific publications as an underlying reason for this neglect and propose an incentive structure for replications within psychology. First, researchers need accessible outlets for publishing replications. To accomplish this, psychology journals could publish replication reports in files that are electronically linked to reports of the original research. Second, replications should get cited. This can be achieved by cociting replications along with original research reports. Third, replications should become a valued collaborative effort. This can be realized by incorporating replications in teaching programs and by stimulating adversarial collaborations. The proposed incentive structure for replications can be developed in a relatively simple and cost-effective manner. By promoting replications, this incentive structure may greatly enhance the dependability of psychology's knowledge base.
© The Author(s) 2012.

Keywords:  philosophy of science; publication bias; replication; scientific fraud; selective reporting

Year:  2012        PMID: 26168120     DOI: 10.1177/1745691612462586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  30 in total

1.  Making sense of the noise: Replication difficulties of Correll's (2008) modulation of 1/f noise in a racial bias task.

Authors:  Christine Madurski; Etienne P LeBel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  The Acid Test for Biological Science: STAP Cells, Trust, and Replication.

Authors:  Cheryl Lancaster
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  What Crisis? Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct.

Authors:  Christian Hopp; Gary A Hoover
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Acute alcohol response phenotype in heavy social drinkers is robust and reproducible.

Authors:  Daniel J O Roche; Michael D Palmeri; Andrea C King
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; William J Brady; Diego A Reinero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Big secrets do not necessarily cause hills to appear steeper.

Authors:  Etienne P LeBel; Christopher J Wilbur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

7.  The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

8.  Stability versus Fluidity of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Attraction and the Role of Religiosity: A Longitudinal Assessment in Two Independent Samples of Croatian Adolescents.

Authors:  Nicole Cohen; Inga Becker; Aleksandar Štulhofer
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-05-07

9.  No Effect of Weight on Judgments of Importance in the Moral Domain and Evidence of Publication Bias from a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  André L A Rabelo; Victor N Keller; Ronaldo Pilati; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Marcus R Munafò; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Brian A Nosek; Sean P David
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.