| Literature DB >> 26167930 |
María Camacho1, María Del Pino Quintana2, Pascual Calabuig3, Octavio P Luzardo1, Luis D Boada1, Manuel Zumbado1, Jorge Orós1.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and effects on acid-base and electrolyte status of several crystalloid fluids in 57 stranded juvenile loggerhead turtles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26167930 PMCID: PMC4500549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Acid-base status upon admission and after fluid therapy for each group of loggerhead sea turtles.
Group 1: 0.9% Na Cl solution; group 2: 5% dextrose + 0.9% Na Cl solutions 1:1; group 3: 0.9% Na Cl and lactated Ringer's solutions 1:1; group 4: lactated Ringer's solution; group 5: untreated turtles. *metabolic acidosis and respiratory alkalosis.
Mean and standard deviation of pH, blood gas and plasma biochemical values during times of sampling of the different treatment groups.
|
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upon admission | After fluid | Previous to release | Upon admission | After fluid | Previous to release | Upon admission | After fluid | Previous to release | Upon admission | After fluid | Previous to release | |
|
| 7.50 ± 0.1 | 7.56 ± 0.06 | 7.58 ± 0.08 | 7.53 ± 0.06 | 7.53 ± 0.07 | 7.58 ± 0.05 | 7.58 ± 0.06 | 7.57 ± 0.06 | 7.61 ± 0.05 | 7.51 ± 0.07 | 7.6 ± 0.06 | 7.55 ± 0.03 |
|
| 30.08 ± 3.40 | 36 ± 5.40 | 33 ± 5.70 | 33.63 ± 4.90 | 40 ± 7.80 | 34 ± 4.30 | 26.5 ± 3.70 | 34.2 ± 5.90 | 33 ± 6.90 | 29.2 ± 3.60 | 34.5 ± 6.30 | 32 ± 4.20 |
|
| 76 ± 10.30 | 62.6 ± 12.30 | 65 ± 22.10 | 70.5 ± 10.80 | 64.5 ± 11.8 | 60 ± 10.80 | 72.8 ± 11.1 | 58.3 ± 7.80 | 61.6 ± 9.0 | 67 ± 9.80 | 64 ± 5.30 | 65 ± 9.20 |
|
| 29 ± 6.20 | 39.2 ± 5.60 | 38.6 ± 5.70 | 33.4 ± 6.20 | 40.3 ± 4.80 | 49.7 ± 4.80 | 32.8 ± 6.10 | 40.2 ± 7.80 | 42 ± 6.40 | 27.9 ±5.50 | 41.3 ± 4.90 | 34.6 ± 6.10 |
|
| 2.01 ± 1.69 | 0.99 ± 0.60 | 0.73 ± 0.40 | 1.96 ± 1.54 | 1.30 ± 1.20 | 0.44 ± 0.30 | 1.41 ± 1.03 | 1.17 ± 1.53 | 0.73 ± 0.54 | 2.90 ± 2.02 | 1.05 ± 0.80 | 0.53 ± 0.30 |
|
| 148 ± 3.04 | 145.7 ± 2.3 | 150 ± 5.06 | 148.5 ±1.90 | 146.2 ± 2.9 | 148.9 ± 3.50 | 148.7 ± 2.5 | 145.8 ± 2.8 | 148.2 ± 2.1 | 147 ± 2.50 | 144.6 ± 2.7 | 149.1 ± 1.90 |
|
| 3.5 ± 0.60 | 2.80 ± 0.30 | 3.30 ± 0.40 | 3.40 ± 0.40 | 2.70 ± 0.30 | 3.10 ± 0.40 | 3.30 ± 0.50 | 2.60 ± 0.50 | 3 ± 0.40 | 3.30 ± 0.40 | 2.90 ± 0.30 | 3.20 ± 0.50 |
|
| 113.30 ± 4 | 106.2 ±3.70 | 110.2 ± 3.80 | 111.3 ± 3.4 | 105.8 ± 4.02 | 109.3 ± 4.3 | 111 ± 3.90 | 104.3 ± 6.4 | 106.5 ± 4.4 | 113.4 ± 3.5 | 105 ± 3.80 | 110.7 ± 5.80 |
|
| 9.80 ± 4.80 | 3 ± 4.30 | 4.50 ± 7.50 | 8.10 ± 3.50 | 2.80 ± 4.20 | 3 ± 5.90 | 8.20 ± 3.90 | 3.80 ± 4.40 | 2.70 ± 3.1 | 9 ± 3.20 | 1.30 ± 4.40 | 6.10 ± 3.10 |
|
| 108 ± 26.60 | 119.2 ± 17.2 | 117.4 ± 22.2 | 111 ± 77.5 | 207 ± 61 | 109.4 ± 15.2 | 106 ± 32.40 | 108 ± 28.60 | 111 ± 12.6 | 115.2 ± 22.3 | 103.2 ± 19.2 | 107 ± 16.50 |
|
| 58.3 ± 25.60 | 88.5 ± 31.2 | 136.5 ± 11 | 71.2 ± 25.40 | 84 ± 30.1 | 134 ± 10.8 | 71.2 ± 25.30 | 86.2 ± 36.6 | 125 ± 25.2 | 57 ± 21.80 | 81.4 ± 30.4 | 135 ± 13 |
|
| 331 ± 11.70 | 335 ± 13 | 362 ± 11 | 337 ± 13.70 | 341 ± 13 | 358 ± 8.70 | 335.5 ± 12.70 | 334 ± 17 | 353.3 ± 8.7 | 327.5 ± 11.3 | 330 ± 11.7 | 358 ± 7.30 |
Group 1: 0.9% Na Cl solution; Group 2: Dextrose 5% + 0.9% Na Cl solution (1:1); Group 3: 0.9% Na Cl + lactated Ringer’s solution (1:1); Group 4: lactated Ringer’s solution.
aStatistically significant differences between initial and after therapy values;
bstatistically significant differences between after therapy and convalescent values;
cstatistically significant differences between initial and convalescent values;
dmean and standard deviation convalescent BUN and Osmolality underestimate the true values because BUN values exceeded the analytic range of the analyzer (140 mg/dl);
eone turtle had glucose levels < 20 mg/dl.
Mean and standard deviation of pH, blood gas and plasma biochemical values during times of sampling of untreated turtles (group 5).
| Parameters | Upon admission | Control day | Previous to release |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.52 ± 0.10 | 7.51 ± 0.08 | 7.57 ± 0.03 |
|
| 35.20 ± 5.03 | 45 ± 8.60 | 35.50 ± 5.30 |
|
| 67.10 ± 13 | 59 ± 9.20 | 59 ± 10.20 |
|
| 34.70 ± 6.60 | 43.60 ± 7.40 | 40.70 ± 6.70 |
|
| 1.11 ± 0.70 | 0.75 ± 0.60 | 0.42 ± 0.20 |
|
| 146.30 ± 4.30 | 146.10 ± 2.50 | 148.80 ± 4.60 |
|
| 3.60 ± 0.33 | 2.90 ± 0.45 | 3.30 ± 0.60 |
|
| 112.60 ± 3.40 | 106.30 ± 4.30 | 107.20 ± 5.10 |
|
| 2.55 ± 7.64 | (-0.9) ± 6.50 | 4.20 ± 6.90 |
|
| 115.9 ± 33.40 | 106.80 ± 21 | 114.8 ± 12.60 |
|
| 71.70 ± 28.20 | 98.70 ± 28.20 | 140 ± 0.00 |
|
| 330.80 ± 12.60 | 339.4 ± 12.50 | 360.6 ± 9.10 |
aStatistically significant differences between initial and control day values;
bstatistically significant differences between control day and convalescent values;
cstatistically significant differences between initial and convalescent values;
dmean and standard deviation convalescent BUN and Osmolality underestimate the true values because BUN values exceeded the analytic range of the analyzer (140 mg/dl).
Mean and standard deviation of convalescent values and statistical comparison with admission and post fluid therapy values.
| Parameters | Convalescent values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (median) ± SD | 10-90th percentile |
|
| |
|
| 7.58 (7.58) ± 0.05 | 7.52–7.63 | < 0.001 | ns |
|
| 33.49 (33.27) ± 5.30 | 27.21–41.30 | < 0.05 | < 0.001 |
|
| 64.05 (60.16) ± 19.80 | 48.87–78.16 | < 0.001 | ns |
|
| 39.15 (38.23) ± 6.26 | 32.60–47.35 | < 0.001 | ns |
|
| 0.57 (0.39) ± 0.38 | 0.30–1.10 | < 0.001 | < 0.01 |
|
| 148.90 (149) ± 3.70 | 145–153 | ns | < 0.001 |
|
| 3.20 (3.10) ± 0.46 | 2.60–4 | < 0.01 | < 0.001 |
|
| 108.80 (109) ± 4.84 | 112.80–114.20 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
|
| 4 (5) ± 5.54 | (-4.11)-11.20 | < 0.001 | < 0.05 |
|
| 112 (110) ± 16.20 | 95.60–131.20 | ns | ns |
|
| 133.90 (140) ± 15.07 | 112.80–140 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
|
| 358.25 (358.62) ± 9.26 | 344.83–369.10 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
P Statistical comparison between convalescent and admission values.
P Statistical comparison between convalescent and post fluid therapy values.
cMean and standard deviation convalescent BUN and Osmolality underestimate the true values because BUN values exceeded the analytic range of the analyzer (140 mg/dl).
ns: no significance