Literature DB >> 26166800

EXTENT AND LOCATION OF INTRARETINAL AND SUBRETINAL FLUID AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH OPTIC DISK PIT MACULOPATHY.

David H W Steel1, Tom H Williamson, D Alistair H Laidlaw, Priyanka Sharma, Christopher Matthews, Jon Rees, Petros Petrou, David G Charteris, Stephen J Charles, C K Patel, Niels Crama, Ed Herbert, Timothy L Jackson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if baseline fundoscopic and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features influence the clinical course of optic disk pit maculopathy.
METHODS: A multicenter retrospective case note review was undertaken, using standardized OCT and clinical data collection. Visual success was defined as at least a two-line visual acuity improvement, anatomical success as full resolution of OCT foveal fluid with restoration of the normal foveal contour, and partial anatomical success as incomplete resolution of the OCT foveal fluid. Outcomes were compared with a synthesis of the literature, using similar eligibility criteria.
RESULTS: Of 36 patients (36 eyes), 2 spontaneously improved and 34 underwent surgery. Visual success was achieved in 64% of surgical cases, anatomical success in 36%, and partial anatomical success in 47%. Cases with multilayer intraretinal and subretinal fluid were less likely to have visual success (P = 0.003). Cases where the fluid did not extend to the macular arcade vessels also had better visual and anatomical outcomes (P = 0.004 and 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Fundoscopic and OCT features can help predict surgical outcome in optic disk pit maculopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26166800     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  7 in total

1.  Multicenter study of pars plana vitrectomy for optic disc pit maculopathy: MACPIT study.

Authors:  R Avci; Z Kapran; Ş Ozdek; M Y Teke; O Oz; D Guven; S Yilmaz; B Kaderli; A H Durukan; G Sobaci; Y B Unver; L Akduman; S Kaynak; I Dogan; U U Inan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [Macular changes in optic disc pits-Optic disc pit maculopathy (ODP-M) : Pathophysiology and possibilities of surgical treatment].

Authors:  J Wachtlin; R G Schumann; M Maier; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Optic Pit Maculopathy: Clinical Features and Management Options.

Authors:  Prashanth G Iyer; Harry W Flynn; Kenneth C Fan; Audina M Berrocal; Raquel Goldhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2021-10-07

Review 4.  Optic disk pit maculopathy: current management strategies.

Authors:  Irini Chatziralli; Panagiotis Theodossiadis; George P Theodossiadis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-10

5.  A Case of Multiple Optic Disc Pits: 21-Year Follow-up

Authors:  Osman Melih Ceylan; Alper Can Yılmaz; Ali Hakan Durukan; Mehmet Talay Köylü; Fatih Mehmet Mutlu
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-29

6.  Treatment outcomes of optic disc pit maculopathy over two decades.

Authors:  Avadhesh Oli; Divya Balakrishnan
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  Surgical outcomes in patients with optic disc pit maculopathy: does peeling the ILM lead to better outcomes?

Authors:  Helena Wagner; Amelie Pielen; Hansjürgen Agostini; Daniel Böhringer; Wolf Alexander Lagrèze; Julia Biermann
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.