Literature DB >> 26166774

Incorporating Genetic Biomarkers into Predictive Models of Normal Tissue Toxicity.

G C Barnett1, S L Kerns2, D J Noble3, A M Dunning4, C M L West5, N G Burnet6.   

Abstract

There is considerable variation in the level of toxicity patients experience for a given dose of radiotherapy, which is associated with differences in underlying individual normal tissue radiosensitivity. A number of syndromes have a large effect on clinical radiosensitivity, but these are rare. Among non-syndromic patients, variation is less extreme, but equivalent to a ±20% variation in dose. Thus, if individual normal tissue radiosensitivity could be measured, it should be possible to optimise schedules for individual patients. Early investigations of in vitro cellular radiosensitivity supported a link with tissue response, but individual studies were equivocal. A lymphocyte apoptosis assay has potential, and is currently under prospective validation. The investigation of underlying genetic variation also has potential. Although early candidate gene studies were inconclusive, more recent genome-wide association studies are revealing definite associations between genotype and toxicity and highlighting the potential for future genetic testing. Genetic testing and individualised dose prescriptions could reduce toxicity in radiosensitive patients, and permit isotoxic dose escalation to increase local control in radioresistant individuals. The approach could improve outcomes for half the patients requiring radical radiotherapy. As a number of patient- and treatment-related factors also affect the risk of toxicity for a given dose, genetic testing data will need to be incorporated into models that combine patient, treatment and genetic data.
Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GWAS; SNP; normal tissue; radiosensitivity; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26166774     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  16 in total

1.  Applying physical science techniques and CERN technology to an unsolved problem in radiation treatment for cancer: the multidisciplinary 'VoxTox' research programme.

Authors:  Neil G Burnet; Jessica E Scaife; Marina Romanchikova; Simon J Thomas; Amy M Bates; Emma Wong; David J Noble; Leila Ea Shelley; Simon J Bond; Julia R Forman; Andrew Cf Hoole; Gillian C Barnett; Frederic M Brochu; Michael Pd Simmons; Raj Jena; Karl Harrison; Ping Lin Yeap; Amelia Drew; Emma Silvester; Patrick Elwood; Hannah Pullen; Andrew Sultana; Shannon Yk Seah; Megan Z Wilson; Simon G Russell; Richard J Benson; Yvonne L Rimmer; Sarah J Jefferies; Nicolette Taku; Mark Gurnell; Andrew S Powlson; Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb; Xiaohao Cai; Michael Pf Sutcliffe; Michael A Parker
Journal:  CERN Ideasq J Exp Innov       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Radiogenomics: A systems biology approach to understanding genetic risk factors for radiotherapy toxicity?

Authors:  Carsten Herskind; Christopher J Talbot; Sarah L Kerns; Marlon R Veldwijk; Barry S Rosenstein; Catharine M L West
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  A Review of Prostate Cancer Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).

Authors:  Sarah Benafif; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind A Eeles
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Optimal design and patient selection for interventional trials using radiogenomic biomarkers: A REQUITE and Radiogenomics consortium statement.

Authors:  Dirk De Ruysscher; Gilles Defraene; Bram L T Ramaekers; Philippe Lambin; Erik Briers; Hilary Stobart; Tim Ward; Søren M Bentzen; Tjeerd Van Staa; David Azria; Barry Rosenstein; Sarah Kerns; Catharine West
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Differences in DNA Repair Capacity, Cell Death and Transcriptional Response after Irradiation between a Radiosensitive and a Radioresistant Cell Line.

Authors:  Mireia Borràs-Fresneda; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Maria Gomolka; Sabine Hornhardt; Ute Rössler; Gemma Armengol; Leonardo Barrios
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  TNFSF10/TRAIL regulates human T4 effector memory lymphocyte radiosensitivity and predicts radiation-induced acute and subacute dermatitis.

Authors:  Jan Baijer; Nathalie Déchamps; Hervé Perdry; Pablo Morales; Sarah Kerns; Alexandre Vasilescu; Sylvain Baulande; David Azria; Paul Henri Roméo; Annette Schmitz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-19

7.  Decision analytic modeling for the economic analysis of proton radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wade P Smith; Patrick J Richard; Jing Zeng; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Ramesh Rengan; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

8.  Genetic Variants of DNA Repair Genes as Predictors of Radiation-Induced Subcutaneous Fibrosis in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ankita Gupta; Don Mathew; Shabir Ahmad Bhat; Sushmita Ghoshal; Arnab Pal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Meta-analysis of Genome Wide Association Studies Identifies Genetic Markers of Late Toxicity Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah L Kerns; Leila Dorling; Laura Fachal; Søren Bentzen; Paul D P Pharoah; Daniel R Barnes; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; Ana M Carballo; David P Dearnaley; Paula Peleteiro; Sarah L Gulliford; Emma Hall; Kyriaki Michailidou; Ángel Carracedo; Michael Sia; Richard Stock; Nelson N Stone; Matthew R Sydes; Jonathan P Tyrer; Shahana Ahmed; Matthew Parliament; Harry Ostrer; Barry S Rosenstein; Ana Vega; Neil G Burnet; Alison M Dunning; Gillian C Barnett; Catharine M L West
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  One Size Fits All: Does the Dogma Stand in Radiation Oncology?

Authors:  David Azria; Celine Bourgier; Muriel Brengues
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.