Literature DB >> 26164428

Equalizing MELD Scores Over Broad Geographies Is Not the Most Efficacious Way to Allocate a Scarce Resource in a Value-based Environment.

Alan Reed1, William C Chapman, Stuart Knechtle, Kenneth Chavin, Richard Gilroy, Goran B G Klintmalm.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26164428     DOI： 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN： 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Are geographic differences in transplantation inherently wrong?

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Douglas W Hanto
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.

Authors:  Christine E Haugen; Tanveen Ishaque; Abel Sapirstein; Alexander Cauneac; Dorry L Segev; Sommer Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Brittany A Shelton; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Kimberly A Forde; Deirdre Sawinski; Meagan Gray; Nancy L Ascher
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.766
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.