Literature DB >> 26164224

Risks and Benefits of Colonoscopy in Patients 90 Years or Older, Compared With Younger Patients.

Jae Myung Cha1, Richard A Kozarek2, Danielle La Selva2, Michael Gluck2, Andrew Ross2, Michael Chiorean2, Johannes Koch2, Otto S Lin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although the numbers of medical procedures performed on extremely elderly patients (90 years or older, nonagenarians) are increasing, there are no data on the performance, diagnostic yield, or safety of colonoscopy for these patients. We compared the performance and safety of diagnostic colonoscopy, as well as lesions detected, in nonagenarians with patients who were 75 to 79 years old.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, we compared data from 76 extremely elderly patients (90 years or older) with data from 140 very elderly patients (75 to 79 years old, controls), all of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy from January 2010 through March 2013 at Virginia Mason Medical Center. All colonoscopies were performed by 15 endoscopists. We compared rates of colonoscopy completion, bowel preparation quality, diagnostic yield, and adverse events.
RESULTS: In extremely elderly patients, more colonoscopies were performed under general anesthesia, compared with controls (P < .001). When extremely elderly patients underwent colonoscopies with moderate sedation, lower doses of midazolam and fentanyl were given, compared with controls (P < .001). Colonoscopies were completed in a lower proportion of extremely elderly patients (88.2% vs. 99.3% for controls, P < .001), and these patients had a higher incidence of inadequate bowel preparation (29.7% vs. 15.0% for controls, P = .011). Colonoscopies were also associated with cardiopulmonary events in a higher proportion of extremely elderly patients (P = .006) as well as overall adverse events, compared with controls (P = .002). A higher proportion of extremely elderly patients were found to have advanced neoplasia (28.4% vs. 6.4% of controls, P < .001) as well as any neoplasia (P < .001 vs. controls). A greater percentage of extremely elderly patients also had large lesions (P = .002) and malignancies detected by histology (P < .001 vs. controls). Eleven extremely elderly patients (14.9%) were found to have cancer or high-grade dysplasia by colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients 90 years or older, diagnostic colonoscopy is associated with increased risk for incomplete procedure, inadequate bowel preparation, and adverse events. However, a large proportion of patients are found to have advanced neoplasia and cancer, compared with patients 75 to 79 years old.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon Cancer Detection; Complication; Old Age; Risk Factor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26164224     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  14 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

3.  How to manage chronic diarrhoea in the elderly?

Authors:  Benjamin Crooks; Jimmy K Limdi; John McLaughlin
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-29

4.  Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Kang; Lina Zhao; Zhiyong Zhu; Felix Leung; Limei Wang; Xiangping Wang; Hui Luo; Linhui Zhang; Tao Dong; Pingying Li; Zhangqin Chen; Gui Ren; Hui Jia; Xiaoyang Guo; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Colonoscopic screening shows increased early incidence and progression of adenomas in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  David E Niccum; Joanne L Billings; Jordan M Dunitz; Alexander Khoruts
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Yield of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults with a History of Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gregory J Williams; Sage T Hellerstedt; Paige N Scudder; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun Young Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Is Elderly Age a Simple Predictive Factor for Inadequate Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Hyun Gun Kim
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Patient Attitudes Toward Individualized Recommendations to Stop Low-Value Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Marc S Piper; Jennifer K Maratt; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Carmen Lewis; Jane Forman; Sandeep Vijan; Valbona Metko; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.