Literature DB >> 26163536

Incidence, degree, and development of graft hypertrophy 24 months after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: association with clinical outcomes.

Jay R Ebert1, Anne Smith2, Michael Fallon3, Rodney Butler3, Robert Nairn3, William Breidahl3, David J Wood4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Graft hypertrophy is a common occurrence after periosteal, collagen-covered and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, development, and degree of graft hypertrophy at 24 months after MACI. The hypothesis was that graft hypertrophy would not be associated with clinical outcome at 24 months. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series, Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: This study was undertaken in 180 consecutive patients (113 male, 67 female) after MACI in the knee. All patients were assessed clinically using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The incidence of hypertrophy relevant to anatomic graft site was investigated, as was the progressive change in hypertrophic studies postoperatively. The degree of tissue overgrowth in hypertrophic cases was investigated, as was its association with patient clinical outcome at 24 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 180 patients, 50 demonstrated a hypertrophic graft at 1 or more postoperative time points. This included 9 grafts (5.0%) at 3 months and 32 grafts (18.7%) at 12 months. At 24 months, 47 grafts (26.1%)-43 (32.1%) tibiofemoral and 4 (8.7%) patellofemoral-were hypertrophic. Patients with hypertrophic grafts at 24 months (n = 47) were younger (P = .051), they had a lower body mass index (BMI; P = .069), and significantly fewer of them had patellofemoral grafts (P = .007) compared with patients who had grafts with full (100%) tissue infill (n = 61). There were no significant differences in any of the KOOS subscales between patients with graft hypertrophy or full (100%) tissue infill at 24 months after surgery, while the severity of graft hypertrophy was not associated with KOOS subscales at 24 months.
CONCLUSION: Hypertrophic grafts after MACI were common and continued to develop through to 24 months after surgery. Hypertrophic growth was associated with being younger and having a lower BMI, was more common on the femoral condyles, and overall was not associated with clinical outcome at 24 months after surgery. However, further research with longer term follow-up is required to evaluate the effect of persistent hypertrophy on graft stability and to assess the use of early surgical intervention to prevent such failure.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical outcome; graft hypertrophy; magnetic resonance imaging; matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation; postoperative assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26163536     DOI: 10.1177/0363546515591257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  8 in total

Review 1.  Designer Stem Cells: Genome Engineering and the Next Generation of Cell-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Farshid Guilak; Lara Pferdehirt; Alison K Ross; Yun-Rak Choi; KelseyH Collins; Robert J Nims; Dakota B Katz; Molly Klimak; Suzanne Tabbaa; Christine T N Pham
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  [Expert consensus on surgical treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis].

Authors:  Central South University National Clinical Research Center For Geriatric Disorders Xiangya Hospital
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Cell-based chondral restoration.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Giuliani; Adam Pickett
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

4.  Wide Variation in Methodology in Level I and II Studies on Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials Comparing Patient Demographics, Treatment Means, and Outcomes Reporting.

Authors:  Bryan Michael Saltzman; Michael L Redondo; Adam Beer; Eric J Cotter; Rachel M Frank; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Bethanie I Ayerst; Catherine L R Merry; Anthony J Day
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  Autologous nasal chondrocytes delivered by injectable hydrogel for in vivo articular cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Wenliang Chen; Changhua Li; Maoxiu Peng; Bingju Xie; Lei Zhang; Xiaojun Tang
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Articular cartilage generation applying PEG-LA-DM/PEGDM copolymer hydrogels.

Authors:  Xing Zhao; Anestis Papadopoulos; Shinichi Ibusuki; David A Bichara; Daniel B Saris; Jos Malda; Kristi S Anseth; Thomas J Gill; Mark A Randolph
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION IN BRAZIL.

Authors:  Pedro Nogueira Giglio; Nelson Foresto Lizier; Débora Levy; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; José Ricardo Pécora; Sergio Paulo Bydlowski; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.