Literature DB >> 26163281

Clinical performance of lateralized versus non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Stefan Greiner1, Christian Schmidt2, Sebastian Herrmann3, Stephan Pauly2, Carsten Perka2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an established therapeutic option in the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). Recent studies have described a positive effect of lateralization of the center of rotation, especially on postoperative rotational function. The goal of this study is to compare the outcome of non-lateralized versus lateralized RSA with particular regard to rotational function in patients with CTA.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients underwent implantation of RSA either with lateralization (n = 17) or without lateralization (n = 17) by use of a 1-cm autologous bone graft ("bony increased offset") of the humeral head for CTA. Clinical outcomes were measured with the Constant score; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and the Activities of Daily Living Requiring External Rotation score, as well as measurement of external rotation and determination of the external rotation lag sign with the arm at the side and at 90° of abduction, at 1 year postoperatively and at final follow-up. Computed tomography scan evaluation was performed in all patients preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively to assess preoperative fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff and bony integration of the graft postoperatively.
RESULTS: At final follow-up, all patients showed significantly increased functional results. There were no significant differences in the evaluated parameters. If patients with degenerative changes of the teres minor were excluded, the lateralized group showed significantly increased external rotation. Bony integration of the graft could be verified on postoperative computed tomography scans in all patients.
CONCLUSION: RSA with bony lateralization shows a trend toward improved external rotation in lateralized RSA, with a statistically significant improvement in external rotation in patients with an intact teres minor.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIO-RSA; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; external rotation; lateralization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26163281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  33 in total

1.  Patient reported outcome measures of bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty compared to bilateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin Thomas Welborn; R Bryan Butler; Bonnie P Dumas; Lisa Mock; Cory A Messerschmidt; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-07

2.  A kinematic and electromyographic comparison of a Grammont-style reverse arthroplasty combined with a l'Episcopo transfer compared to a lateralized humeral component reverse for restoration of active external rotation.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Francesco Cuoghi; George S Athwal; Ilaria Parel; Maria V Filippi; Andrea G Cutti; Elisabetta Fabbri; Antonio Padolino; Paolo Paladini; Fabio Catani; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

5.  Customized tantalum-augmented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid bone defect and excessive medialization: description of the technique.

Authors:  Nicola Ivaldo; Tony Mangano; Giovanni Caione; Mario Rossoni; Angelo Ligas
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-11-30

6.  Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  M A Verdano; D Aliani; C Galavotti; C Maroun; E Vaienti; F Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

7.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 8.  Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the available evidence.

Authors:  Richard Dimock; Mohamed Fathi Elabd; Mohamed Imam; Mark Middleton; Arnaud Godenèche; A Ali Narvani
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-06-02

Review 9.  Acromial fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon C Lau; Richard Large
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-10-04

10.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.