Literature DB >> 26163190

Multidimensional representation of objects--The influence of task demands.

L Goldfarb1, K Sabah2.   

Abstract

In our daily life, we often encounter situations in which different features of several multidimensional objects must be perceived simultaneously. There are two types of environments of this kind: environments with multidimensional objects that have unique feature associations, and environments with multidimensional objects that have mixed feature associations. Recently, we (Goldfarb & Treisman, 2013) described the association effect, suggesting that the latter type causes behavioral perception difficulties. In the present study, we investigated this effect further by examining whether the effect is determined via a feedforward visual path or via a high-order task demand component. In order to test this question, in Experiment 1 a set of multidimensional objects were presented while we manipulated the letter case of a target feature, thus creating a visually different but semantically equivalent object, in terms of its identity. Similarly, in Experiment 2 artificial groups with different physical properties were created according to the task demands. The results indicated that the association effect is determined by the task demands, which create the group of reference. The importance of high-order task demand components in the association effect is further discussed, as well as the possible role of the neural synchrony of object files in explaining this effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature binding; Neural synchrony; Object file theory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26163190     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0894-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

Review 1.  The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective.

Authors:  C von der Malsburg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Antonino Raffone; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  How the deployment of attention determines what we see.

Authors:  Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006-08-01

5.  Characterizing the limits of human visual awareness.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Anne Treisman; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; S Dobmeyer; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Strategies and models of selective attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry.

Authors:  C Koch; S Ullman
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

9.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.

Authors:  A Treisman; H Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  What was that object? On the role of identity information in the formation of object files and conscious object perception.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.