Literature DB >> 16822133

What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration.

Lorenza S Colzato1, Antonino Raffone, Bernhard Hommel.   

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship between the binding of visual features (as measured by their aftereffects on subsequent binding) and the learning of feature-conjunction probabilities. Both binding and learning effects were obtained, but they did not interact. Interestingly, (shape-color) binding effects disappeared with increasing practice, presumably because of the fact that only 1 of the features involved was relevant to the task. However, this instability was only observed for arbitrary, not highly overlearned combinations of simple geometric features and not for real objects (colored pictures of a banana and strawberry), where binding effects were strong and resistant to practice. These findings suggest that learning has no direct impact on the strength or resistance of bindings or on speed with which features are bound; however, learning does affect the amount of attention particular feature dimensions attract, which again can influence which features are considered in binding. Copyright 2006 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16822133     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  45 in total

1.  A common computational process in cueing and conjunction search tasks.

Authors:  KangWoo Lee; Hyunseung Choo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  Implementation of structure-mapping inference by event-file binding and action planning: a model of tool-improvisation analogies.

Authors:  Chris Fields
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-06-05

3.  Attentional control of the creation and retrieval of stimulus-response bindings.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Jiska Memelink; Sharon Zmigrod; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-25

4.  The microgenesis of action-effect binding.

Authors:  Ilona B Dutzi; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-09-23

5.  Multidimensional representation of objects--The influence of task demands.

Authors:  L Goldfarb; K Sabah
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  Selective binding of stimulus, response, and effect features.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Roland Pfister; Wilfried Kunde; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

7.  David and Goliath-size does matter: size modulates feature-response binding of irrelevant features.

Authors:  Tarini Singh; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-04-24

8.  Decoding Stimulus-Response Representations and Their Stability Using EEG-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 9.  Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-01

10.  Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action.

Authors:  Sharon Zmigrod; Michiel Spapé; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.