| Literature DB >> 26163013 |
Martin Risch1, Dominik W Meier2, Benjamin Sakem3, Pedro Medina Escobar4, Corina Risch5, Urs Nydegger6, Lorenz Risch7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The vitamin B12 and folate status in nonanaemic healthy older persons needs attention the more so as decrease in levels may be anticipated from reduced haematinic provision and/or impaired intestinal uptake.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26163013 PMCID: PMC4499201 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-015-0060-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Chart representing all the recruited participants with those retained and those excluded from the study (n = number of participants). *Some participants fulfill several exclusion criteria
Baseline characteristics. The parameters given are associated with markers of vitamin B12 and folic acid status and are classified according to three different age groups. P-values are given for differences among the three different groups
| 60-69 yrs | 70-79 yrs | ≥80 yrs | P values+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female/Male (n) | 278/237 | 247/188 | 112/81 | 0.53 |
| Hb (g/L) | 143.00 (136.00, 151.00); n = 515 | 142 (134, 149.00); n = 435 | 139 (131.00, 146.00); n = 193 | <0.001 |
| MCV (fl) | 89.00 (87.00, 91.00); n = 515 | 90.00 (87.00, 92.00); n = 435 | 91.00 (88.00, 93.00); n = 193 | <0.001 |
| Fedosov’s ω | 0.13 (−0.13, 0.36); n = 463 | 0.02 (−0.30, 0.33); n = 411 | −0.10 (−0.39, 0.22); n = 184 | <0.001 |
| B12 (pmol/L) | 237 (190, 292); n = 515 | 228 (180.00, 292); n = 435 | 231 (185, 301); n = 193 | 0.22 |
| holoTc (pmol/L) | 52.3 (41.0, 66.0); n = 508 | 54.1 (39.3, 69.0); n = 432 | 51.8 (38.2, 67.3); n = 193 | 0.60 |
| MMA (nmol/L) | 207 (169, 261.00); n = 467 | 221 (179, 294); n = 412 | 244 (190, 326); n = 184 | <0.001 |
| Hcy (μmol/L) | 12.5 (10.5, 14.80); n = 515 | 13.9 (11.6, 16.7); n = 435 | 15.5 (12.8, 19.9); n = 193 | <0.001 |
| Serum folate (nmol/L) | 19.5 (13.8, 27.0); n = 515 | 17.7 (12.9; 25.3); n = 4354 | 17.2 (13.0, 25.3); n = 193 | 0.01 |
| Red cell folate (nmol/L) | 899 (700,1157); n = 498 | 870 (669,1157); n = 431 | 837 (646, 1136); n = 192 | 0.17 |
| Folate/B12 | 83.4 (58.9, 116.3); n = 515 | 81.5 (55.9, 112.0); n = 435 | 76.8 (57.3, 104.5); n = 139 | 0.09 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 90 (82, 98); n = 515 | 82 (69, 89); n = 435 | 67 (54, 78); n = 193 | <0.001 |
| Mentzer index | 18.70 (17.60, 19.79); n = 515 | 18.94 (17.77, 20.22); n = 435 | 20.0 (18.33, 21.09); n = 193 | <0.001 |
Footnote: Values are median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. n = number
+Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables; chi square test for proportion female/male
Fig. 2Vitamin B12 and holoTC serum levels in three arbitrarily defined advanced age groups classified according to sex. The box plot representation with vitamin B12 (panel a) and holoTC (panel b) as appearing in three age groups. The difference of vitamin B12 concentrations among males and females is significant in 70–79 year old (p = 0.001) and not significant in the participants aged 60–69 (p = 0.07) and ≥ 80 years (p = 0.69). The same comparisons of holoTC concentrations are significant for participants aged 60–69 and 70–79 (both p < 0.001), and not significant in the particpants ≥ 80 years (p = 0.77)
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of vitamin B12, holoTC, MMA and Hcy. The Fedosov wellness parameter ω = −0.5 was used as a separator of the groups assumed deficient and assumed healthy
Cut-offs indicating probable vitamin B12 deficiency, probable vitamin B12 sufficiency and a grey zone of diagnostic uncertainty. These cut-offs are given for four markers of vitamin B12 status and were obtained by ROC-analysis
| Probable vitamin B12 deficiency | Grey zone | Probable vitamin B12 sufficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B12 (pmol/L) | <131 | 131 – 315 | ≥316 |
| Holotranscobalamin (pmol/L) | <25.8 | 25.8 – 56.9 | ≥57.0 |
| MMA (nmol/L) | >485 | 217 – 485 | ≤216 |
| Homocysteine (μmol/L) | >26.8 | 9.6 – 26.8 | ≤9.5 |