BACKGROUND: Subclinical cobalamin deficiency is common in the elderly, but the sensitivity and specificity of serum total cobalamin for this diagnosis is poor. Serum holotranscobalamin (holoTC), a measure of biologically available cobalamin, is considered a better marker for early cobalamin depletion than total cobalamin. However, in elderly populations, health-related reference intervals for holoTC and correlations to renal function are not entirely clear. METHODS: HoloTC was determined with an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (AxSYM®) in 790 elderly non-vitamin-supplemented Swedish men, median age 75.3 years. Renal function was assessed with creatinine, cystatin C and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR calculated from creatinine). RESULTS: Median holoTC was 51.8 pmol/L, the health-related reference interval 19.6-132.3 pmol/L. There was no significant difference in mean holoTC in probands with normal compared to high creatinine (P = 0.80) and cystatin C (P = 0.82). No significant differences between the quartiles of creatinine or cystatin C in mean of log holoTC were seen. HoloTC correlated strongly with total cobalamin (r = 0.69, P < 0.001), weaker with eGFRcreatinine (r = -0.09, P < 0.05) and creatinine (r = 0.09, P < 0.05), the latter correlation was only seen in subjects with creatinine <100 µmol/L. HoloTC correlated negatively with plasma total homocysteine (r = -0.24, P < 0.001), but not with cystatin C and age. CONCLUSIONS: Serum holoTC in healthy elderly men shows the same distribution as earlier described for a younger reference population. In this group of elderly subjects, holoTC did not correlate to reduced renal function. Thus, holoTC appears to be a promising tool for evaluating cobalamin status also in elderly populations.
BACKGROUND: Subclinical cobalamindeficiency is common in the elderly, but the sensitivity and specificity of serum total cobalamin for this diagnosis is poor. Serum holotranscobalamin (holoTC), a measure of biologically available cobalamin, is considered a better marker for early cobalamin depletion than total cobalamin. However, in elderly populations, health-related reference intervals for holoTC and correlations to renal function are not entirely clear. METHODS: HoloTC was determined with an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (AxSYM®) in 790 elderly non-vitamin-supplemented Swedish men, median age 75.3 years. Renal function was assessed with creatinine, cystatin C and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR calculated from creatinine). RESULTS: Median holoTC was 51.8 pmol/L, the health-related reference interval 19.6-132.3 pmol/L. There was no significant difference in mean holoTC in probands with normal compared to high creatinine (P = 0.80) and cystatin C (P = 0.82). No significant differences between the quartiles of creatinine or cystatin C in mean of log holoTC were seen. HoloTC correlated strongly with total cobalamin (r = 0.69, P < 0.001), weaker with eGFRcreatinine (r = -0.09, P < 0.05) and creatinine (r = 0.09, P < 0.05), the latter correlation was only seen in subjects with creatinine <100 µmol/L. HoloTC correlated negatively with plasma total homocysteine (r = -0.24, P < 0.001), but not with cystatin C and age. CONCLUSIONS: Serum holoTC in healthy elderly men shows the same distribution as earlier described for a younger reference population. In this group of elderly subjects, holoTC did not correlate to reduced renal function. Thus, holoTC appears to be a promising tool for evaluating cobalamin status also in elderly populations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Creatinine; analytes; clinical studies; evaluation of new methods; laboratory methods; nutrition
Authors: C Lewerin; H Nilsson-Ehle; S Jacobsson; H Johansson; V Sundh; M K Karlsson; Ö Ljunggren; M Lorentzon; J A Kanis; U H Lerner; S R Cummings; C Ohlsson; D Mellström Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Maria Wallin; Lars Barregard; Gerd Sallsten; Thomas Lundh; Magnus K Karlsson; Mattias Lorentzon; Claes Ohlsson; Dan Mellström Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 6.741