Literature DB >> 26162450

Exploring the feasibility of smart phone microphone for measurement of acoustic voice parameters and voice pathology screening.

Virgilijus Uloza1, Evaldas Padervinskis2, Aurelija Vegiene3, Ruta Pribuisiene3, Viktoras Saferis4, Evaldas Vaiciukynas5, Adas Gelzinis5, Antanas Verikas6,7.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability of acoustic voice parameters obtained using smart phone (SP) microphones and investigate the utility of use of SP voice recordings for voice screening. Voice samples of sustained vowel/a/obtained from 118 subjects (34 normal and 84 pathological voices) were recorded simultaneously through two microphones: oral AKG Perception 220 microphone and SP Samsung Galaxy Note3 microphone. Acoustic voice signal data were measured for fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer, normalized noise energy (NNE), signal to noise ratio and harmonic to noise ratio using Dr. Speech software. Discriminant analysis-based Correct Classification Rate (CCR) and Random Forest Classifier (RFC) based Equal Error Rate (EER) were used to evaluate the feasibility of acoustic voice parameters classifying normal and pathological voice classes. Lithuanian version of Glottal Function Index (LT_GFI) questionnaire was utilized for self-assessment of the severity of voice disorder. The correlations of acoustic voice parameters obtained with two types of microphones were statistically significant and strong (r = 0.73-1.0) for the entire measurements. When classifying into normal/pathological voice classes, the Oral-NNE revealed the CCR of 73.7% and the pair of SP-NNE and SP-shimmer parameters revealed CCR of 79.5%. However, fusion of the results obtained from SP voice recordings and GFI data provided the CCR of 84.60% and RFC revealed the EER of 7.9%, respectively. In conclusion, measurements of acoustic voice parameters using SP microphone were shown to be reliable in clinical settings demonstrating high CCR and low EER when distinguishing normal and pathological voice classes, and validated the suitability of the SP microphone signal for the task of automatic voice analysis and screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic analysis; Smart phone; Voice screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26162450     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3708-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  28 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for selecting microphones for human voice production research.

Authors:  Jan G Svec; Svante Granqvist
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Effects of unilateral vocal cord paralysis on objective voice measures obtained by Praat.

Authors:  Haldun Oguz; Munir Demirci; Mustafa A Safak; Necmi Arslan; Ahmet Islam; Selda Kargin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Telephony-based voice pathology assessment using automated speech analysis.

Authors:  Rosalyn J Moran; Richard B Reilly; Philip de Chazal; Peter D Lacy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Performance of an automated, remote system to detect vocal fold paralysis.

Authors:  Robert N Wormald; Rosalyn J Moran; Richard B Reilly; Peter D Lacy
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between Multi-Dimensional Voice Program and Praat.

Authors:  Youri Maryn; Paul Corthals; Marc De Bodt; Paul Van Cauwenberge; Dimitar Deliyski
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 0.849

6.  The prevalence of voice problems among adults in the United States.

Authors:  Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Philip C Doyle
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Using the patient's questionnaire data to screen laryngeal disorders.

Authors:  A Verikas; A Gelzinis; M Bacauskiene; V Uloza; M Kaseta
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Reliability of OperaVOX against Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP).

Authors:  M Mat Baki; G Wood; M Alston; P Ratcliffe; G Sandhu; J S Rubin; M A Birchall
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.597

View more
  14 in total

1.  Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.

Authors:  Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas; Viktoras Šaferis; Virgilijus Uloza
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  An iOS-based VoiceScreen application: feasibility for use in clinical settings-a pilot study.

Authors:  Virgilijus Uloza; Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.236

Review 3.  Terapia de voz en el contexto de la pandemia covid-19; recomendaciones para la práctica clínica.

Authors:  Adrián Castillo-Allendes; Francisco Contreras-Ruston; Lady Cantor; Juliana Codino; Marco Guzman; Celina Malebran; Carlos Manzano; Axel Pavez; Thays Vaiano; Fabiana Wilder; Mara Behlau
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 4.  Terapia Vocal No Contexto Da Pandemia Do Covid-19; Orientações Para A Prática Clínica.

Authors:  Adrián Castillo-Allendes; Francisco Contreras-Ruston; Lady Cantor; Juliana Codino; Marco Guzman; Celina Malebran; Carlos Manzano; Axel Pavez; Thays Vaiano; Fabiana Wilder; Mara Behlau
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Acoustic analysis of vowels in patients with sleep apnea syndrome in sitting and supine positions.

Authors:  Lucia Zamora-Molina; Luis Hernandez-Blasco; Eduardo Garcia-Pachon
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  The Effect of Microphone Frequency Response on Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice: An Examination of Low-Cost Electret Headset Microphones.

Authors:  Shaheen N Awan; Mohsin A Shaikh; Maude Desjardins; Hagar Feinstein; Katherine Verdolini Abbott
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Influence of Smartphones and Software on Acoustic Voice Measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Jenna N Brosious; Staci L Sorrell; Supraja Anand
Journal:  Int J Telerehabil       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 8.  Voice Therapy in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidelines for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Adrián Castillo-Allendes; Francisco Contreras-Ruston; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Juliana Codino; Marco Guzman; Celina Malebran; Carlos Manzano; Axel Pavez; Thays Vaiano; Fabiana Wilder; Mara Behlau
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Multimodal Wearable Sensors to Measure Gait and Voice.

Authors:  Dimitrios Psaltos; Kara Chappie; Fikret Isik Karahanoglu; Rachel Chasse; Charmaine Demanuele; Amey Kelekar; Hao Zhang; Vanessa Marquez; Tairmae Kangarloo; Shyamal Patel; Matthew Czech; David Caouette; Xuemei Cai
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2019-10-29

10.  Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely.

Authors:  Cong Zhang; Kathleen Jepson; Georg Lohfink; Amalia Arvaniti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.